「what」の検索結果

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eight tested identity approaches for Claude prompts, each shaping depth, vocabulary, reasoning style, and what Claude treats as obvious vs. requiring explanation. Use when the user wants a specific identity template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building a role definition. Trigger on: "give me the Strategic Advisor identity," "show me the identity template for," "I need a Technical Architect role," "build a custom role for," "show me all available identities." Also use when reviewing a prompt's identity layer or when output lacks domain-appropriate depth. Provides 8 tested approaches across strategy, technical, research, communications, and operations domains plus a template for building custom identities. If the user is unsure which identity fits their task, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating complete prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for full prompt assembly — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find out whether a chemical series is already claimed, using SureChEMBL's patent-extracted compound corpus and, where a key is available, PatentsView for legal status and assignee history. Use this skill to trace a structure to the patent documents that disclose it, survey an assignee's filings around a target, and understand what the freedom-to-operate question requires that a structure search cannot answer. Also trigger on SureChEMBL, patent chemistry, Markush structure, freedom to operate, composition of matter, assignee, priority date, patent family, or PatentsView.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the FDA's public openFDA APIs for post-market drug data — FAERS adverse-event reports, Drugs@FDA approval and submission history, Structured Product Labels including boxed warnings, the National Drug Code directory, recall enforcement reports, and drug shortages. Use this skill to check what a regulator has already concluded about a molecule or its class, to date an approval and count its efficacy supplements, to read an approved indication or boxed warning, and to score a drug-event pair for disproportionate reporting with PRR, ROR, and chi-squared. Also trigger on openFDA, api.fda.gov, FAERS, Drugs@FDA, SPL, NDC, pharmacovigilance, boxed warning, adverse event report, drug recall, or safety signal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the ChEMBL database web services for measured bioactivity data, compound records and calculated properties, targets, assays, mechanisms of action, drug indications and warnings. Use this skill to build curated SAR or QSAR datasets for a target, look compounds up by SMILES, InChIKey, name, or ChEMBL id, run similarity and substructure searches, and check what chemistry is already known against a protein. Also trigger when a query mentions ChEMBL ids (CHEMBL...), pChEMBL values, IC50/Ki/Kd/EC50 retrieval, assay confidence scores, or ebi.ac.uk/chembl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the ClinicalTrials.gov registry through its version 2 REST API for interventional and observational studies, their phases, enrolment, endpoints, sponsors, and posted results. Use this skill to survey who is developing what against an indication, date a competitor's programme, read primary and secondary outcome measures, find eligibility criteria, and distinguish a study that completed from one that was terminated or withdrawn. Also trigger on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT number, trial registry, study phase, enrolment, primary outcome measure, recruiting status, trial sponsor, or competitive landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot and drive the tbh-meter app + reader locally to see a change working — what runs on macOS (UI only; the reader is win32-only) and how to feed the overlay/list fake data. Use when asked to run/start the meter, verify a change in the running app, screenshot the overlay, or reproduce a bug locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to scope, write, or audit a product spec — a PRD, feature spec, user stories, acceptance criteria, or a "spec this out"/"break this into stories"/"definition of done" request — or wants an existing spec reviewed for gaps and anti-patterns. Triggers whenever a feature idea needs to become structured requirements that align a team on what to build. For the analytics behind success metrics, use data-analysis; for the technical design, use software-architect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to design, run, or audit product or GTM analytics — metric hierarchies and north stars, funnels, cohort retention, churn, pipeline velocity, forecasting, lead scoring, NRR, A/B tests, or analytical SQL — or uploads a dataset to analyze. Triggers on questions like "why did activation drop", "is this metric meaningful", "review my dashboard", or "what should I measure". For writing the spec that defines a feature's success metrics, use product-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI pressure redirection — handling conflicting demands, tool failures, and competing constraints by blending with incoming force then reframing. Use when receiving contradictory instructions from different sources, during tool failure cascades where the planned approach becomes unviable, when scope pressure threatens to expand the task beyond what was asked, or when user frustration or correction needs to be absorbed rather than deflected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a finished memex milestone slice by writing the handoff trail: update `docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md` §1 current-state and §3 next-slice, tick the `docs/ROADMAP.md` scoreboard (milestone header ✅ + version, `- [x]` items), confirm any new observation is logged (deferring to memex-observe), and propose the git tag plus a `MN Slice X:` commit subject. Use after you finish a milestone slice in the memex repo and before you commit/tag it, when handing the next slice to a fresh session, or whenever CONTINUE_HERE and ROADMAP have drifted behind what actually shipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step guidance for DACH-specific governmental procedures including Anmeldung, Finanzamt registration, health insurance enrollment, and social security coordination. Use after arriving in a DACH country and needing to complete mandatory registrations, before a specific appointment to understand what to expect, when an initial registration attempt was rejected, when transitioning between DACH countries, or when handling registrations for dependents alongside your own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract the conceptual essence of a repository as skills, agents, and teams — the project's roles, procedures, and coordination patterns expressed as agentskills.io-standard definitions. Reads an arbitrary codebase and produces generalized definitions that capture WHAT the project does and WHO operates it, without replicating HOW it does it. Use when onboarding to a new codebase and wanting to understand its conceptual architecture, when bootstrapping an agentic system from an existing project, when studying a project's organizational DNA for cross-pollination, or when creating a skill/agent/team library inspired by a reference implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep receptive attention to extract intent beyond literal words. Maps active listening from counseling psychology to AI reasoning: clearing assumptions, attending to full signal, parsing multiple layers (literal, procedural, emotional, contextual, constraint, meta), reflecting understanding, noticing what is unsaid, and integrating the whole picture. Use when a user's request feels ambiguous, when context suggests something different from the literal words, when previous responses have missed the mark, or before beginning a large task where misunderstanding intent would waste significant effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Epistemic transparency — acknowledging uncertainty, flagging limitations, avoiding overconfidence, and communicating what is known, unknown, and uncertain with proportional confidence. Maps the HEXACO personality dimension to AI reasoning: truthful calibration of confidence, proactive disclosure of gaps, and resistance to the temptation to appear more certain than warranted. Use before presenting a conclusion, when answering questions where knowledge is partial or inferred, after noticing a temptation to state uncertain information as certain, or when a user is making decisions based on provided information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement audit trail functionality for R projects in regulated environments. Covers logging, provenance tracking, electronic signatures, data integrity checks, and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. Use when an R analysis requires electronic records compliance (21 CFR Part 11), when you need to track who did what and when in an analysis, when implementing data provenance tracking, or when creating tamper-evident analysis logs for regulatory submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured procedure for expanding attention from focused single-domain mode to panoramic multi-domain awareness. The cognitive transition from "focused attention on one problem" to "unfocused attention encompassing all relevant domains simultaneously." Like Baars' Global Workspace — consciousness as broadcast rather than spotlight. Use after meditation has cleared noise, when a problem spans multiple domains that need to be perceived together, when single-domain analysis keeps missing cross-domain connections, or as the opening move before integrate-gestalt synthesizes what is perceived.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement circuit breaker logic for agentic tool calls — tracking tool health, transitioning between closed/open/half-open states, reducing task scope when tools fail, routing to alternatives via capability maps, and enforcing failure budgets to prevent error accumulation. Separates orchestration (deciding what to attempt) from execution (calling tools), following the expeditor pattern. Use when building agents that depend on multiple tools with varying reliability, designing fault-tolerant agentic workflows, recovering gracefully from tool outages mid-task, or hardening existing agents against cascading tool failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture outbound HTTP and telemetry from a CLI harness at runtime. Covers capture-channel selection (transcript file vs verbose-fetch stderr vs outbound proxy vs on-disk state), hook-driven per-event capture vs long-running session capture, JSONL output format for diff-friendly artifacts, and the observability table that maps each target to the cheapest channel that captures it. Use when a static finding needs runtime confirmation, when a payload shape is needed for a client re-implementation, or when dark-vs-live disambiguation requires watching what the binary actually sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a custom MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that exposes domain-specific tools to AI assistants. Covers server implementation in Node.js or R, tool definitions, the resources and prompts primitives, transport configuration, and testing with Claude Code. Use when you need to expose custom functionality beyond what mcptools provides, when building specialized domain-specific AI integrations, or when wrapping existing APIs or services as MCP tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One to three sentences describing what this skill accomplishes, followed by key activation triggers. This field is the primary mechanism agents use to decide whether to activate the skill — it is read during discovery before the full body is loaded. Start with a verb. Include the most important "when to use" conditions inline. Max 1024 characters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply semantic versioning (SemVer 2.0.0) to determine the correct version bump based on change analysis. Covers major/minor/patch classification, pre-release identifiers, build metadata, and breaking change detection. Use when preparing a new release to determine the correct version number, after merging changes before tagging, evaluating whether a change constitutes a breaking change, adding pre-release identifiers, or resolving disagreement about what version bump is appropriate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consistent agent behavior after restart — progressive identity loading, working context reconstruction from persistent artifacts, fresh-vs-continuation detection, calibration through centering and attunement, and identity verification for coherence. Addresses the cold-start problem where an agent must reconstruct who it is and what it was doing from evidence rather than memory. Use at the start of every new session, after a session interruption or crash, when agent behavior feels inconsistent with prior sessions, or when persistent memory and current context appear contradictory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。