5,329 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull the latest remote base branch into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when the agent needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pull latest origin/main into the current local branch and resolve merge conflicts (aka update-branch). Use when Codex needs to sync a feature branch with origin, perform a merge-based update (not rebase), and guide conflict resolution best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
International journal scout — searches candidate SCI/SSCI/EI/Scopus journals via Wanfang foreign journal API, performs L1 deterministic rejection screening, and L2 citation fingerprint analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese journal scout — searches candidate journals via Wanfang API, performs L1 deterministic rejection screening (language/funding/subject mismatch), and L2 citation fingerprint analysis (reference journal distribution → academic ecosystem positioning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese journal matcher — performs L3 6-dimensional matching (keywords, cited direction, trend, solicitation, institution, cross-discipline), calculates conditional acceptance probability with review cycle estimation, and outputs tiered submission strategy (aspiration-stable-safety) using 4-layer weighted ranking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
International journal matcher — performs L3 6-dimensional matching for SCI/SSCI/EI/Scopus journals, computes conditional acceptance probability with review cycle estimation, applies 4-layer weighted ranking, and outputs tiered submission strategy including CAS warning screening and Chinese scholar friendliness analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform an advanced offensive security audit and attack simulation on the current features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and audit SEO issues affecting crawlability, indexation, rankings, and organic performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Intercepts and analyzes HTTP/HTTPS traffic from mobile applications using Burp Suite proxy to identify insecure API communications, authentication flaws, data leakage, and server-side vulnerabilities. Use when performing mobile application penetration testing, assessing API security, or evaluating client-server communication patterns. Activates for requests involving mobile traffic interception, Burp Suite mobile proxy, API security testing, or mobile HTTPS analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and optimize individual pages for conversion performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with Obsidian vaults using the Obsidian CLI to read, create, search, and manage notes, tasks, properties, and more. Also supports plugin and theme development with commands to reload plugins, run JavaScript, capture errors, take screenshots, and inspect the DOM. Use when the user asks to interact with their Obsidian vault, manage notes, search vault content, perform vault operations from the command line, or develop and debug Obsidian plugins and themes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs financial ratio analysis, DCF valuation, budget variance analysis, and rolling forecast construction for strategic decision-making. Use when analyzing financial statements, building valuation models, assessing budget variances, or constructing financial projections and forecasts. Also applicable when users mention financial modeling, cash flow analysis, company valuation, financial projections, or spreadsheet analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation analysis to estimate intrinsic value per share. Triggers when user asks for fair value, intrinsic value, DCF, valuation, "what is X worth", price target, undervalued/overvalued analysis, or wants to compare current price to fundamental value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews design artifacts for quality, pattern application, and API design. Use when performing design reviews in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews integration completeness including design-implementation consistency, review/test coverage, and completion criteria. Use when performing integration review in Construction Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews pull requests for overall quality before merging. Combines code quality and security checks at PR level. Use when performing pre-merge review in Operations Phase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shows you how to use Cowork's parallel workers to run multiple tasks at the same time instead of one after another — dramatically cutting the time on batch work. For processing large batches of files or research tasks, when running multiple independent analyses simultaneously, or during a performance optimization session. Use when the user says "speed up", "parallel workers", "batch task", "process multiple files", "why is cowork so slow", "faster", "do several things at once", or "can cowork multitask".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a dogfooding session for hyalo — build from source, exercise the CLI against real knowledgebases (own KB, MDN, GitHub Docs, VS Code docs), find bugs, verify recent fixes, assess UX, measure performance, and write a structured report. Use this skill whenever the user says /dogfood, "dogfood", "run a dogfood session", "test hyalo against real data", or wants to exercise hyalo on real knowledgebases to find issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a reflective consolidation pass over a hyalo-managed knowledgebase directory — detecting structural issues, fixing broken links, flagging stale content, normalizing metadata, and reporting what changed. Use this skill when the user says /hyalo-tidy, "consolidate the knowledgebase", "clean up the KB", "run KB hygiene", "tidy", or "what needs attention in the knowledgebase". Also use when the user asks about knowledgebase health, broken links, orphan files, stale iterations, or metadata inconsistencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。