「dex」の検索結果

Act as a senior Amazon account growth operator that combines Amazon performance-drop analytics, Amazon growth-opportunity analytics, Amazon Ads data, retail readiness, BSR/rank signals, margin, inventory, and campaign/search-term evidence into a prioritized profitable growth action plan. Use when Codex needs to decide what to protect, fix, scale, reduce, pause, harvest, launch, or monitor for an Amazon brand, agency, marketplace, ASIN set, or account; when building daily, weekly, or monthly Amazon account operating plans; when reallocating ad budget; when deciding which ASINs are safe or risky to push; or when turning performance-drop and growth-opportunity findings into approval-gated actions with success/failure criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find Amazon Ads search terms ready for exact-match harvesting from auto, broad, phrase, or other discovery campaigns. Use when Codex needs standalone or Rocketcart MCP-aware search-term harvesting: classify terms by harvest readiness, resolve live IDs, choose safe destination campaigns/ad groups, preflight duplicates/current negatives/destination feasibility, decide whether source negatives are justified, execute only explicitly approved rows, and read back/monitor Sponsored Products or Sponsored Brands actions without unsafe negatives, duplicate routing, stale approvals, brand-defense cuts, own-ASIN-defense cuts, launch/rank mistakes, or low-sample overfitting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for read-first Amazon Sponsored Products optimization, product-aware growth, preflight readiness, and post-change monitoring reviews that can run standalone from static exports or use Rocketcart MCP as an optional Amazon Ads plus product-intelligence layer. Guides Codex to inspect Rocketcart profiles, live SP campaigns, product ads/ASIN context, category rank/BSR movement, competitor signals, product readiness, budget and targeting drift, snapshots/changelogs, and proposed approval-gated action rows without executing writes by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search Reddit posts by meaning via the reddapi.dev index.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skills-store에서 명시한 skill 또는 agent를 찾아 git pull 후 홈 디렉토리나 현재 프로젝트의 Claude/Codex skills/agents로 설치합니다.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a skeptical Claude review over the current diff or branch range.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show stored output for a Claude Companion job.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate an implementation or investigation task to Claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cancel a running Claude Companion job.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate an implementation or investigation task to Claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show Claude Companion jobs for the current workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the current worktree or a base diff with Claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check Claude Companion readiness and gate status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a prompt to Claude via `claude -p`. Use when the user wants to offload a task to Claude from another agent (Codex, Cursor, another Claude session), get a second opinion, or run a parallel implementation. Default model is opus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or modify frontend interfaces using repository-native components while preserving accessibility, responsive behavior, state handling, and visual verification. Use for UI features, design implementation, forms, client-side defects, and frontend refactors; do not use for backend-only or infrastructure-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, and evaluate risk-based software tests across unit, integration, contract, end-to-end, and regression layers. Use when adding tests, reproducing bugs, improving coverage, diagnosing flaky tests, or defining a test strategy; do not use to change production behavior unless the user also requests implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and implement infrastructure, CI/CD, container, deployment, observability, and operational configuration changes with least privilege, staged validation, and rollback awareness. Use for pipelines, infrastructure as code, Kubernetes, containers, release automation, monitoring, and production-readiness work; do not use to perform destructive production actions without explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or modify backend APIs, services, jobs, persistence, and integrations while preserving contracts, authorization, data integrity, and failure behavior. Use for server-side features, database changes, background processing, backend defects, and service refactors; do not use for frontend-only or infrastructure-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets, dependencies, and infrastructure permissions; do not use to exploit live systems or modify code unless separately requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for correctness defects, regressions, security risks, data-integrity problems, concurrency hazards, and missing meaningful tests. Use for pull requests, branches, commits, patches, or working-tree reviews; do not use for implementation unless the user separately requests fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a repository code or configuration change through reproduction, focused checks, review, and evidence. Use for end-to-end features and fixes; not for explanation-only, review-only, research, content publishing, or production operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate complex engineering work across bounded subagents while protecting the main context, preventing edit conflicts, and measuring whether delegation was worthwhile. Use when the user asks to delegate, parallelize, orchestrate, use subagents, fan out a review, or handle a large task with independent workstreams; do not use for small, tightly coupled, or inherently sequential tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pressure-test an existing plan or design artifact until it is coherent enough for the next workflow step or plainly blocked. Use when the user wants to be grilled on a plan, design doc, PRD, ADR, rollout plan, migration runbook, rolling-wave project shape, or slice contract; when they say "grill me"; or when Codex should interrogate a source-of-truth artifact, inspect code and adjacent docs before asking, auto-answer evidence-backed questions, ask only about conflicts or low-confidence recommendations, edit the original file in place, preserve the artifact's existing format, and keep conclusions, blockers, readiness, and deferred work synchronized in the document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finalize an implemented rolling-wave slice for user review. Use when the user wants Codex to review the current branch state against a ready-for-review or in-review slice contract, confirm and fix required findings, repeat review and verification until no required findings remain, ask before accepting findings that materially change project shape or contradict project assumptions, record review state, and leave the clean slice in review for complete-slice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。