5,954 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit and sync design tokens between the source of truth (tokens.json, Figma variables export) and the code that should consume them (Tailwind config, CSS custom properties, theme files). Finds drift -- hardcoded values, orphan tokens, out-of-date copies -- and fixes it in the right direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses how ready a business is for AI adoption across six dimensions. Evaluates data maturity, tech stack, team skills, process documentation, budget, and culture. Generates a comprehensive ai-readiness-report.md with scores, gap analysis, and recommended starting points. Aligned with OneWave AI's audit methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs a deep code review of files, modules, a diff, or a branch - finding security vulnerabilities (mapped to OWASP Top 10:2025), correctness bugs, performance problems, and maintainability issues - and returns severity-ranked findings with evidence and concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or sanity-check code, asks "is this safe", "what's wrong with this", "find bugs", or wants a security or performance pass before shipping. For posting line comments on a GitHub pull request, use git-pr-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy a 2-layer parallel agent hierarchy for large, parallelizable work — big refactors, multi-file migrations, codebase-wide audits, bulk generation. A top-tier commander (Fable or Opus) orchestrates the swarms; the user picks a power level (Max Power / Heavy / Balanced / Economy) that sets the Opus/Sonnet/Haiku model mix per layer. Layer 1 is 3-50+ specialist agents, each with its own full context window; Layer 2 is 2+ sub-agents per member. Includes git safety, tiered sizing, a pre-deploy gate, phantom-completion checks, and multi-wave follow-up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze spending patterns and find savings. 50/30/20 rule, subscription audit, debt payoff strategies, emergency fund roadmap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit your calendar with Cowork's calendar tools -- measure meeting load and fragmentation, identify which recurring meetings earn their slot, propose consolidations and focus blocks, and draft the diplomatic messages that reclaim your week.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a website or UI and de-AI it — find the patterns that make it look template-generated (in both design and copy) and return specific, prioritized fixes that push it toward editorial, premium, human-crafted. Reviews layout, color, type, spacing, motion, accessibility, AND the words. Use after building or generating any frontend, or when a site looks "fine but generic" and you can't say why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
サイトのSEO問題を監査・診断し、改善提案を行うスキル。 「SEOを監査して」「検索順位が上がらない原因を調べて」「技術SEOをチェック」等のリクエストで発動。
Use when building, auditing or freezing a journal submission package from the canonical manuscript. Detects drift between the source and the per-journal submission copy, builds byte-preserving packages with manifests, and records current, stale or frozen status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when finding papers or building a reference list. Searches PubMed, Semantic Scholar and bioRxiv/medRxiv, includes only references verified through an API, and generates BibTeX. Auditing an existing reference list is /verify-refs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing a medical-imaging dataset (DICOM/NIfTI) for modelling. Profiles spacing, orientation, intensity, label integrity, foreground fraction and target volume, gates them against the plan, then plans and audits preprocessing and augmentation for leakage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when validating or evaluating a trained medical-imaging model. Audits split leakage and validation design, computes task-correct held-out metrics (Dice + HD95, AUROC + AUPRC, FROC, calibration), and covers uncertainty/OOD and Grad-CAM explainability, each with a gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing how an LLM or multimodal LLM is evaluated on a clinical task (report generation, VQA, text extraction). Covers reference standard, clinical-efficacy metrics beyond BLEU/ROUGE, hallucination, contamination and prompt sensitivity. Imaging models are /model-assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or auditing a radiomics or tabular clinical-ML prediction model with a classical learner (LASSO, SVM, random forest, XGBoost and similar). Enforces nested CV, dimensionality control, in-fold feature selection, feature stability, calibration and external validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when turning a personal agent skill into an open-source, distributable one. Runs a PII audit, generalizes personal details, checks licence compatibility, reviews cross-platform adapters and walks through packaging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when references must be written, rendered or converted. Checks [@key] citation keys, renders the reference list with a journal CSL via pandoc, converts [N] markers, injects Zotero Word field codes and runs manuscript-DOCX cross-reference QC. Read-only auditing is /verify-refs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool. Covers 49 reporting guidelines and risk-of-bias tools (STROBE, CONSORT, STARD, TRIPOD+AI, PRISMA, QUADAS and more), marking each item PRESENT, PARTIAL or MISSING. Not a reviewer critique (/self-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits shell scripts for correctness, portability, and common pitfalls. Use when reviewing shell scripts or before committing shell changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Rust code for unsafe blocks, ownership issues, and Cargo dependency risks. Use when reviewing Rust code or before merging Rust changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python testing patterns with pytest, fixtures, TDD, mocking, async and integration tests. Use when writing or auditing a Python test suite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates test suites for coverage gaps, TDD/BDD compliance, and anti-patterns. Use when auditing test quality or before a major release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies NASA Power of 10 rules for safety-critical verifiable code. Use when auditing financial, medical, or high-reliability system code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Makefiles for build correctness, portability, and recipe duplication. Use when reviewing a Makefile or before committing Makefile changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies NIST/CWE security hardening to Python and Rust code. Use when auditing code for vulnerabilities or proposing concrete security remediations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。