4,576 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run all code quality checks (security, complexity, test coverage) on the current PR and post a combined report as a GitHub PR comment. Use before merging a PR, during code review, or when asked to check code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft the changelog entry for all unreleased commits in Keep a Changelog format. Groups commits into Added, Changed, Fixed, Removed, and Security. Use before releasing a new version or when updating CHANGELOG.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enterprise-specific view across CopilotKit + AG-UI. "Enterprise" here = CopilotKit's COMMERCIAL surfaces (Premium / CopilotKit Enterprise / Intelligence Platform / paid tiers), NOT CopilotKit running inside a big company. Tracks the commercial product surfaces (from product-surface-scan — Enterprise Intelligence, Cloud, self-host license, threads/persistence tier, Inspector, premium UI/Angular SDK, analytics, security bundle, Slack/Teams), applies the free-vs-paid classifier to decide if an issue belongs here, surfaces cross-page product contradictions, and tracks enterprise questions/complaints, community-sourced prospects (with a sales owner), and enterprise reporters with prior-week trend. Elevated to the top of the weekly report. Runs standalone ("who's at enterprise this week") or invoked by weekly-report. Triggers on "enterprise report", "enterprise signals", "enterprise status", "who at enterprise this week".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search the web and open-source code for library usage, API syntax, and documentation via Exa. Use this whenever verifying an API signature, looking up how a library is used, checking a config file format, or resolving an error from a third-party dependency -- including when you think you already know the answer, since library APIs drift. Also use for questions documentation cannot answer: release timing, breaking changes, "is X still maintained", licensing, security advisories, and ecosystem comparisons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check proposed stack, data flows, cloud choices, and delivery controls against declared enterprise policies, compliance frameworks, and security controls. Trigger at R2/R3 risk classification, before locking architecture decisions, or when the operating profile names a governance pointer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-audit code changes to identify side effects, regression risks, and unhandled edge cases before merging or deploying. Use after a change is complete and before merging to a shared branch, before deploying a hotfix, after complex multi-module refactoring, or when a previous review may have missed side effects in async, state-mutating, or security-sensitive code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes Symfony PHP — DI container, bundles, Doctrine, Messenger, Security voters, console commands. For Laravel / Eloquent / Artisan use `laravel`. For framework-free PHP use `php-coder`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when hardening a Linux host you operate — SSH posture, a default-deny firewall baseline, and unattended security upgrades, each verified on the box rather than assumed from a config file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for deep Symfony project analysis: kernel/bootstrap, container wiring, routing/request flow, Doctrine, security, Messenger, and Symfony-specific failure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for deep Node.js / Express project analysis: boot flow, middleware order, async behavior, data layer, auth/security, and Node-specific runtime failure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing/reviewing client-side UI (React/Vue/vanilla) — insecure-render + client-trust gaps AI ships: XSS via innerHTML, client secrets, client-only auth, CORS wildcard, token in localStorage
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says "review this", "check my code", or wants feedback on changes. Reviews for correctness, quality, security, and coding standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply the Opquast Digital Quality Framework (245 rules, 14 categories) when building, reviewing, or auditing websites and web applications. Use for web development quality assurance, accessibility compliance, security hardening, privacy implementation, e-commerce best practices, and holistic digital quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Testing] Use when you need full-site QA audit (accessibility, performance, security, SEO) with visual reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for QA analysis, test planning, test cases, or root-cause analysis of a defect. Also use for post-merge PR review analysis: auditing recent closed PRs for Devin/GitHub/security bot comments, verifying whether requested corrections were applied, and turning pending fixes into SPECs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Central entry point of the afonsoft agent harness. Use when starting a new project, resuming an existing one, planning features/Epics/releases, or running any multi-step agent-driven work. Validates and reconciles SPECs (SDD), audits the codebase and harness for gaps (security, architecture, performance, hygiene), proposes improvements, fragments work into GitHub Issues, delegates implementation/QA/review to specialized skills, and re-validates everything until delivery. Also use to review unapproved SPECs, reconcile open GitHub Issues with code, or run a final gap check before closing a release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test Docker and Kubernetes security controls for RBAC abuse, breakout, and secret exposure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test APIs against OWASP API Security Top 10 including discovery, auth abuse, and protocol-specific checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Technical SEO audit with GEO-specific checks — crawlability, indexability, security, performance, SSR, and AI crawler access
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。