「auth」の検索結果

Opens a deliverable (talk, course module, paper, book chapter, or referee report) for AI-assisted work across sessions. Interviews the author for the manifest, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, an append-only HANDOFF.md, a numbered planning/ wiki with open questions, an inbox/ for dictated braindumps, a gitignored checks/, and the house deck template for talks. Use when starting deadline-driven work that spans sessions, or when asked to open a deliverable, set up a talk, paper, or module for the pipeline, or make a manifest. Not for one-off tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

House rules and craft for LaTeX Beamer slide decks (lectures, seminars, talks), drawn from the author's own Overleaf edits and published slide-design guidance. Covers storyboarding, frame titles, slide prose, word and frame budgets, layout without overfull boxes, XeLaTeX fonts and Korean (xeCJK), color, figures and screenshots, Overleaf source hygiene, speaker notes, and a build-and-QA loop with a contact sheet. Use when writing, editing, reviewing, or building a Beamer deck, theme, or storyboard. A course skill supplies course facts and the frame skeleton; this skill supplies the craft. Not for HTML or PowerPoint decks, posters, or papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize a supplied URL from fetched content with source locations, acquisition coverage and explicit access failures. Use for articles, documentation, API references and web pages; preserve version, author attribution and uncertainty in the requested output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly asks Rewrite Room to route documentation work, or when audit/sync/freshness, user-facing authoring, citation-driven writing, docs-to-skill conversion, and AI-instruction optimization overlap and exactly one workflow must be chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific technology, library, system, protocol, or tool to answer a concrete technical question with source-traceable evidence. Use when current implementation details, version behavior, configuration, compatibility, or authoritative technical facts must be verified rather than recalled. Also use when explicitly asked to incorporate verified findings into an existing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures and runs git hooks with prek (or the pre-commit it replaces — same `.pre-commit-config.yaml`). Use when adding or troubleshooting git hooks, writing a `prepare-commit-msg` or `commit-msg` stage hook, or authoring `.pre-commit-hooks.yaml` for hook distribution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared Python 3.11+ development rules — type safety and the boundary policy for `Any` (ty, native generics, Protocol, TypeIs, Pydantic), layered architecture and SOLID, error handling, security, performance, identifier naming, PEP 723 script dependencies, Rich/Typer output, tooling defaults (uv, ruff, ty, hatchling, pytest), and testing requirements (behavioral coverage, TDD). Activates when any Python skill or agent needs the shared rules for implementation, code review, refactoring, or test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pytest test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant faults, behavior-preserving refactors, realistic boundaries, isolation, and diagnostics. Use for test-quality audits, coverage-gap reviews, regression-test changes, or mocking reviews; preserve existing project gates rather than inventing coverage targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain. Use for failing test names or pytest output, distinguishing product, interface, oracle, and harness defects without automatically changing expectations or forcing an architectural redesign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate pytest failures without treating tests or implementation as automatic authority. Use when diagnosing regressions, debugging test errors, or deciding whether to fix a test or code; trace the contract, product, fixture, and observation before choosing an evidence-backed correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures CI/CD pipelines for automated Python package publishing to PyPI or GitLab Package Registry. Use when creating GitHub Actions or GitLab CI release workflows, setting up trusted publishing or API token-based PyPI authentication, configuring version management with git tags and hatch-vcs, writing pyproject.toml publishing metadata, testing packages against TestPyPI, or documenting the release process for a Python project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility router for semantic skill tightening. Delegate goal recovery, authority, semantic conservation, evaluation contracts, and instruction optimization to Skill Lapidary rather than duplicating that system in Plugin Creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility router for skill goal recovery and authority assessment. Delegate to Skill Lapidary's establish-validatable-goals capability rather than maintaining a second goal-contract system in Plugin Creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-platform hooks reference for AI coding assistants — Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf, and Amp. Covers hook authoring in Node.js (ESM and CJS) and Python, per-platform event schemas, inline-agent hooks and MCP in agent frontmatter, common JSON I/O, exit codes, best practices, and a fetch script to refresh docs from official sources. Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging hooks for any AI assistant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when investigating failing tests or deciding whether to change the test or product. Validate test expectations against authoritative intent, trace product and test boundaries, and require evidence for the correction rather than automatic code fixes or test dismissal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design validation and maintained regression protection before test authoring. Use for TDD increments, acceptance or regression evidence, test boundary/oracle decisions, and multi-factor interaction coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize existing documentation with an observed code/configuration/API change while preserving each document's purpose and authority. Use after implementation changes can make documentation stale, incomplete, or internally inconsistent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit documentation claims against implementation and authoritative repository evidence. Use when checking whether README, architecture, configuration, API, usage, or feature documentation is stale, incomplete, contradicted by code, missing implemented behavior, or inconsistent with a normative contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant fault detection, refactor tolerance, boundary fidelity, isolation, and diagnostic value. Use when auditing test quality, reviewing coverage gaps, improving regression protection, or assessing tests after a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install and configure the GitHub CLI (gh) for AI agent environments where gh may not be pre-installed and git remotes use local proxies instead of github.com. Use when gh command not found, shutil.which returns None, need GitHub API access for issues or PRs or releases or workflow runs, or repository operations fail with 'failed to determine base repo' error. Provides auto-install script with SHA256 verification, GITHUB_TOKEN auth with anonymous fallback, and the required -R flag pattern for proxy environments. Covers project management via GitHub Projects V2, milestones via REST API, issue lifecycle templates, and label taxonomy management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, search, summarize, export, and transcribe a user's own local WeChat 4.x history on macOS or Windows; diagnose setup and re-extract the device key after a WeChat update. Use for WeChat messages, chats, contacts, and local archives. Do not use for remote accounts or devices the user is not authorized to access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Opens a talk, module, paper, chapter, or referee report as a multi-session deliverable. Interviews the author, then scaffolds deliverable.yml, HANDOFF.md, the planning/ wiki, inbox/, and checks/. Use for deadline-driven work spanning sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。