「gate」の検索結果

Watch running terminal processes for crashes and stack traces. When an error appears, navigate to the failing file and line, diagnose, and fix it automatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle production incidents — triage, mitigate, communicate, and write postmortems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ABSOLUTE MUST to debug and inspect LLM/AI agent traces using PostHog's MCP tools. Use when the user pastes a trace or session URL (e.g. /ai-observability/traces/<id> or /ai-observability/sessions/<id>), asks to debug a trace, figure out what went wrong, check if an agent used a tool correctly, verify context/files were surfaced, inspect subagent behavior, investigate LLM decisions, or analyze token usage and costs. Also use when raw SQL/HogQL against `events.properties.$ai_input` / `$ai_output_choices` returns empty — message content lives only on the dedicated `posthog.ai_events` table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigates distributed application performance using PostHog APM (OpenTelemetry span) data via MCP. Use when the user asks about service traces, slow HTTP/database spans, error spans, trace IDs, or span attributes — not AI observability traces or product logs. Uses posthog:query-apm-spans, posthog:apm-trace-get, posthog:apm-services-list, posthog:apm-attributes-list, and posthog:apm-attribute-values-list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate AI observability evaluations of both types — `hog` (deterministic code-based) and `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual pass/fail results, and generate AI-powered summaries of patterns across many runs. Use when the user asks to debug why an evaluation is failing, surface common failure modes, compare results across filters, dry-run a Hog evaluator, prototype a new LLM-judge prompt, or manage the evaluation lifecycle (create, update, enable/disable, delete).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch multiple explore subagents in parallel to investigate architecture, data models, auth, APIs, and deployment. Synthesize into an onboarding document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train neural operators (FNO, DeepONet) to learn solution maps for parametric PDE families. Once trained, solve new PDE instances in milliseconds. Use when you need to solve many instances of the same PDE with different parameters/ICs/BCs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end flow, spectral, and mass cytometry (CyTOF) pipeline from raw FCS files to differentially abundant/expressed cell populations. Orchestrates the read -> compensate/unmix -> transform -> QC -> doublet-removal -> cluster-or-gate -> annotate -> diffcyt DA/DS chain with flowCore/CATALYST/diffcyt, branching on instrument type and on clustering-vs-gating. Use when processing a cytometry experiment end-to-end, deciding the pipeline path for an instrument, or wiring the flow-cytometry component skills into one analysis with valid sample-level statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end 16S/ITS amplicon workflow from demultiplexed FASTQ to a consensus differential-abundance result, orchestrating cutadapt primer removal, per-run DADA2 ASV inference (learnErrors/mergeSequenceTables/removeBimeraDenovo), region-matched taxonomy assignment, a SEPP/Greengenes2 tree, alpha/beta diversity at a declared sampling depth (phyloseq/vegan, adonis2 paired with betadisper), compositional DA as a consensus of >=2 tools (ALDEx2/ANCOM-BC2) on unrarefied counts, and optional PICRUSt2 functional prediction gated on NSTI. Covers the stage-ordering decisions (primers before truncation, per-run error model, rarefy for diversity not DA, predicted potential not activity) and defers each per-step choice to the six microbiome skills. Use when staging an amplicon study end to end or chaining ASV inference, taxonomy, diversity, and differential abundance. For shotgun reads see workflows/metagenomics-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query aggregate Langfuse cost, volume, latency, and model telemetry efficiently with Metrics API v2. Use for dashboards, rollout checks, usage summaries, and cost or latency comparisons; use Observations API v2 instead when individual rows are actually required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk through the devnet → mainnet deployment checklist for a Soroban contract or Stellar dApp. Use when a user says "deploy to Stellar mainnet", "going live on Stellar", "deploy my Soroban contract", "Stellar production deployment", "mainnet checklist", or "ship it on Stellar". Covers pre-deployment verification, deployment mechanics with stellar CLI, and post-deployment monitoring with Soroban-specific gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, verify, implement, and deliver repository work through evidence-backed ownership and quality gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores a CARLA map's road network through the Map/Waypoint API — a natural-language rundown of the whole map ("give me the topology"), drawing the topology to confirm the modelled map matches the visible one, enumerating junctions to resolve phrases like "the 4-way junction in the middle", nearest-waypoint lane facts, and next/previous lane navigation. Use when the user asks about the map's layout, lanes, junctions, topology, or to locate/navigate specific map elements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Central authority for Claude Agent SDK (TypeScript and Python SDKs). Covers SDK installation, authentication (Anthropic key, Bedrock, Vertex), sessions and resumption, forking sessions, streaming vs single mode, custom tools, permissions (allowedTools, disallowedTools, permissionMode), MCP integration, system prompts (CLAUDE.md, appendSystemPrompt, outputStyle), cost tracking, todo tracking, structured outputs, hosting patterns, plugins, and SDK branding guidelines. Assists with building custom agents, configuring SDK options, and troubleshooting SDK issues. Delegates 100% to docs-management skill for official documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run agent-adapted STRIDE + access-control analysis on an agent system. Produces a ranked risk list with agentic mitigations (scope / split / filter / gate / review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert payment integration specialist mastering payment gateway integration, PCI compliance, and financial transaction processing. Specializes in secure payment flows, multi-currency support, and fraud prevention with focus on reliability, compliance, and seamless user experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Claude Code slash commands and OpenCode command files that delegate to subagents. Use when creating new commands or refactoring existing ones to follow the delegation pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。