「how」の検索結果

Maintain a review-first Markdown knowledge base for Codex practices with source provenance, engineering capture, citation-aware queries, explicit archive and promotion, and deterministic linting. Use when asked to capture a durable engineering lesson, ingest Codex research, query or archive what the repository knows, check wiki health, reconcile conflicting guidance, or promote verified knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a repository code or configuration change through reproduction, focused checks, review, and evidence. Use for end-to-end features and fixes; not for explanation-only, review-only, research, content publishing, or production operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select the smallest useful Codex engineering workflow from this repository's existing skills. Use when a task spans multiple engineering concerns, the user is unsure which skill to invoke, or loading every specialist would waste context; return a recommendation only and do not execute the engineering task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate complex engineering work across bounded subagents while protecting the main context, preventing edit conflicts, and measuring whether delegation was worthwhile. Use when the user asks to delegate, parallelize, orchestrate, use subagents, fan out a review, or handle a large task with independent workstreams; do not use for small, tightly coupled, or inherently sequential tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or modify backend APIs, services, jobs, persistence, and integrations while preserving contracts, authorization, data integrity, and failure behavior. Use for server-side features, database changes, background processing, backend defects, and service refactors; do not use for frontend-only or infrastructure-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or modify frontend interfaces using repository-native components while preserving accessibility, responsive behavior, state handling, and visual verification. Use for UI features, design implementation, forms, client-side defects, and frontend refactors; do not use for backend-only or infrastructure-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and implement infrastructure, CI/CD, container, deployment, observability, and operational configuration changes with least privilege, staged validation, and rollback awareness. Use for pipelines, infrastructure as code, Kubernetes, containers, release automation, monitoring, and production-readiness work; do not use to perform destructive production actions without explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review application and infrastructure changes for exploitable security risks by tracing assets, trust boundaries, attacker-controlled input, authorization, sensitive data, and dangerous sinks. Use for security reviews, threat-focused PR reviews, authentication or authorization changes, input handling, secrets, dependencies, and infrastructure permissions; do not use to exploit live systems or modify code unless separately requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, and evaluate risk-based software tests across unit, integration, contract, end-to-end, and regression layers. Use when adding tests, reproducing bugs, improving coverage, diagnosing flaky tests, or defining a test strategy; do not use to change production behavior unless the user also requests implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides how far ahead to plan, what to discount future payoffs by, and which backlog items can be dropped without analysis - using receding-horizon planning, an explicit discount factor, and branch-and-bound pruning against the incumbent. Use when building a roadmap, prioritising a backlog, arguing about short-term versus long-term, setting quarterly or annual plans, or when planning has become an end in itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Splits scarce time, budget or traffic across competing products, channels, campaigns or variants by treating them as a multi-armed bandit - Thompson sampling over beta posteriors, with optimism for anything not yet tried enough to judge. Use when deciding what to work on next, how to divide a marketing budget, which product to prioritise, whether to kill something that is underperforming, or when picking a winner among test variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report which extensions the connected NeatContext context expects, and whether this machine provides them. Use when the user asks what a context can reach, why an extension tool is missing, or how to connect one here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show or set NeatContext routing to auto, ask, or manual for Codex, with an optional default shared with every other NeatContext host. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or clearly asks to change routing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show or set NeatContext routing to auto, ask, or manual for the current Kimi Code session, with an optional global default for new sessions. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill or clearly asks to change routing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report which extensions the connected NeatContext context expects, and whether this machine provides them. Use when the user asks what a context can reach, why an extension tool is missing, or how to connect one here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Error handling patterns for API endpoints. Use when implementing error handling, writing middleware, or reviewing how errors are caught and formatted in API code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a technical topic thoroughly by exploring the codebase and summarizing findings. Use when asked to investigate how something works, research an area of the codebase, trace a data flow, or understand a component in depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate two separate areas of the codebase simultaneously and combine findings into a comparison report. Use when you need research on two independent topics at once, want to compare two subsystems, or need to understand how two components relate to each other.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research the codebase to answer a question without making any changes. Use when exploring code, understanding architecture, or investigating how something works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explains what a skill is and demonstrates that skills are working. Use when testing skills, when asked about skills, or when asked to demonstrate how skills work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to test the peoplereadme CLI end-to-end, including the fidelity harness (eval/calibrate) with a synthetic persona fixture and live LLM calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the ≤10-minute Loom walkthrough script for a completed Weekly Community Signal report — a plain spoken briefing that dives straight into what the team needs to know, walking the report top to bottom (CopilotKit page first, then AG-UI in the same order). Straightforward and factual, NOT a radio show or a performance; no hype opener, no blame framing. Runs after every report (invoked by weekly-report) and on "loom script", "walkthrough script", "record the loom", "narrate the report".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate beautiful, on-brand HTML artifacts — reports, diagrams, diff reviews, slide decks, plans, recaps, dashboards. Loads on creation intents ("create a plan", "make me an implementation plan", "generate a diagram", "build a slide deck", "draft a recap", "visualize this", "render this as HTML", "make me a status update") and exploration intents ("show me three layouts", "explore document shapes", "compare visual treatments", "explore a new design system", "compare replacement brand directions") and iteration intents ("make this beautiful", "polish this report", "make this less generic", "design this", "theme this", "use my brand", "iterate on this design", "review this artifact", "make this bolder", "make this quieter", "simplify this design", "animate this", "improve the look of", "give this a refresh"). Captures brand from the user's codebase, asking, or live site, then applies it to every artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check on your Drakeling companion creature, send it care, or see how it is feeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。