2,641 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Interprets the aldosterone-to-renin ratio using active renin concentration (ARC) to screen for primary aldosteronism. Triggered when a clinician has PAC and ARC results and asks 'How do I interpret this ARR using active renin concentration?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) method over hypokalemia for screening hypertensive patients for primary aldosteronism. Use when a clinician asks what test to use for screening hypertensive patients with resistant hypertension or unexplained hypokalemia for PA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interprets the saline infusion test (SIT) to assess the probability of primary aldosteronism when a patient has a positive aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) and requires confirmatory testing. Triggers include evaluating post‑infusion plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) after a positive ARR, hypertension work‑up, or when deciding whether to proceed to adrenal venous sampling (AVS).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered presentation generation via the 2slides API — create slides from text, match a reference image style, summarize documents into decks, add AI voice narration, and export pages/audio. Use for any "make slides", "create a deck", or "slides from this document" request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare and risk-check the next rolling-wave slice for implementation. Use when the user wants to continue a rolling-wave project, draft one bounded slice in the main context by default, use a fresh planning author only when context or discovery cost warrants it, use a fresh preparation reviewer when semantic risk or uncertainty warrants independent pressure-testing, decompose parallel implementation chunks where appropriate, identify agent, human, either, or hybrid execution fit, write or update docs/rolling-wave/{project}/slices/NNN-slug.md, and mark that slice ready even when other slices are active.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uma ferramenta para criar e gerenciar addons do Garry's Mod, incluindo scripts Lua, criação de conteúdo e empacotamento de addons. Use quando: desenvolvendo novos addons, escrevendo scripts Lua para GMod, organizando arquivos de addon, ou quando o usuário menciona Garry's Mod, GMod, scripts Lua ou desenvolvimento de addons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing or fixing prose that reads like a leaked reasoning transcript — dead design-session citations such as (decision N), audit item codes, or §N of uncommitted drafts; change narration such as "used to", "no longer", "this cut"; stack or review vantage ("a later PR in this stack", "rejected in review"); reviewer-addressed justifications; control-flow narration; or hedged planning residue in comments, JSDoc, docs, or Agent Notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The LAW a council SEAT is bound by — deliberation protocol, pact obligations, governance, and decision-ledger recording — the discipline half of a seat. Trigger when: - Holding a seat on a bound council (architect, lead-maintainer, process-auditor, or a summoned guest). - Depositing an independent assessment, routing a decision, or recording assent or a finding. - Auditing whether the council honored the pact, the delegation table, or the barring lifecycle. - Prompt contains: /council, council seat, deliberation protocol, pact, delegation table, decision ledger, barring, merge-consent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TJS2 (吉里吉里Z 内蔵スクリプト言語) の言語仕様と組み込みクラスのリファレンス。.tjs ファイル / *.ks (KAG) 内の埋め込みスクリプト / TJS2 コード断片 を扱う、書く、レビューする、デバッグするときに使う。JavaScript / TypeScript に似ているが文法と意味論が違うので、JS の感覚で書くと壊れる場合が多い。組み込みクラス (Array / Dictionary / Date / Math / RegExp / Exception) の API もここに集約。**呼び出されたら必ず「JS との主な違い」セクションを最初に確認し、その上で必要な詳細リファレンスを Read で取りに行くこと。** 吉里吉里Z 本体のクラス API (Window / Layer / System / Storages / Bitmap 等) や engine 内部はこのスキルの対象外。
吉里吉里Z (kirikiri Z) 本体クラス API のリファレンス。TJS2 で吉里吉里Z 上のスクリプトを書く、レビューする、デバッグするときに使う。Layer / Window / Bitmap / System / Storages / Font / Plugins / Timer / Debug / AsyncTrigger / Scripts / BinaryStream / Matrix32 / Matrix44 / Rect / ImageFunction のコア API、サウンド系 (WaveSoundBuffer / SoundBuffer / VideoOverlay)、DrawDevice (BasicDrawDevice / SDLDrawDevice / OGLDrawDevice / GPUDrawDevice / NullDrawDevice)、OpenGL 描画系 (Canvas / Texture / ShaderProgram / Offscreen / VertexBinder / VertexBuffer)、および主要プラグイン提供クラス (HttpRequest / GdiPlus.* / WIN32Dialog / CSVParser / LineParser / Process / Pad / MenuItem / Unzip / Zip / PSD / SimpleHTTPServer) を網羅。**呼び出されたら必ず「共通パターン」と「クロスカッティング概念」を確認し、必要な詳細クラスは doc/reference/*.md を Read しに行くこと。** TJS2 言語そのものや組み込みクラス (Array / Dictionary / Math 等) は別 skill (`tjs2`) を参照。エンジン内部構造 (C++ 実装、レンダリングパイプライン詳細) は対象外。
Write a single-thesis narrative newsletter essay from Ahmad's OpenMark saves. Use when Ahmad wants a thoughtful long-form piece with one clear argument, not a roundup or news recap. Trigger phrases include "essay", "long-form", "think piece", "thoughtful post", "argue that", "make a case for", "/newsletter-essay". Output is one strong thesis sentence + 3–5 narrative sections + closing call-to-think, no tables, no bullets unless necessary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered presentation generation via the 2slides API — create slides from text, match a reference image style, summarize documents into decks, add AI voice narration, and export pages/audio. Use for any "make slides", "create a deck", or "slides from this document" request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick one open GitHub issue off this repository's queue, implement the fix, and open a pull request for it. One issue and one PR per run. Use when the user asks to burn down the issue backlog, or when the issue-burndown workflow invokes it. It never merges, never closes an issue, never edits .github/workflows/, and never acts on an issue from outside the organisation unless a maintainer has opted it in.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly read-only repository audit. Grades one rotating rubric from .claude/audit-rubrics/, files between zero and five GitHub issues for what it finds, and changes no files. Use when the user asks to audit the repo, or when the audit-weekly workflow invokes it. It never edits, commits, branches, or opens pull requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ciclo de desarrollo de 8 fases: solicitudes de funciones, estado actual, planificación funcional, frontend, planificación de backend, código de backend, pruebas, casos de uso. Marco iterativo para el desarrollo sistemático de software.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Canalización automatizada de desarrollo de software. Escanea proyectos, prioriza tareas, analiza código u orquesta bucles de desarrollo. Cero dependencias (solo la biblioteca estándar de Python).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarises one sprint from the board export, sprint report and review or stand-up notes the user provides into a one-page DRAFT sprint review summary: the sprint goal as written, items delivered, items not delivered with the reasons the sources state, carry-over, impediments, metrics exactly as given, and numbered questions for the retrospective, every row referenced to a work item or note fragment and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "summarise the sprint", "write the sprint review", "what did we deliver this sprint", "list the carry-over and blockers" or "draft the sprint recap". Do not use for the retrospective write-up or themed lessons across several sprints, use lessons-learned-synthesis instead; for a weekly project status report, use project-status-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads one spreadsheet, CSV export or pasted table together with the user's question and drafts an insight pack: a data profile, observations cited to named columns and values and framed as leads, caveats, and suggested charts and follow-up analyses. Every figure carries the label "as read, verify in source"; correlation is never stated as causation. Use when the user asks to "profile this spreadsheet", "what does this data say", "find anomalies in this extract", "give me a first read on this CSV" or "summarise this table". Do not use for a purchase order log or spend extract, use purchase-order-anomaly-review instead; for actuals versus budget, use budget-variance-explainer instead; for a report that arrives by email on a schedule, use report-attachment-analyzer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review native presenter classes in WordPress plugins without requiring better-data - converting DTOs or domain objects into REST arrays, admin table rows, JS config payloads, email variables, and public view models with allowlisted fields, context methods, redaction by default, locale/date/number formatting, no DTO mutation, and correct WordPress escaping boundaries. Use when adding FooPresenter, response mappers, admin-row arrays, wp_send_json payloads, rest_ensure_response data, wp_add_inline_script config, or when code returns raw DTOs, WP_Post, WC_Order, get_object_vars, json_encode, or unescaped HTML from controllers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "make everyone tell the same story", "write our elevator pitch ladder", or "build a spokesperson Q&A and approved boilerplate pack"; derives from the narrative-registry canon, message house, and brand voice a repeatable enablement kit — an elevator ladder (10-second / 30-second / 2-minute), a spokesperson Q&A (tough questions with on-canon answers), an approved boilerplate/bio pack (25 / 50 / 100-word), and a do/don't language sheet — so sales, support, founders, and partners repeat one consistent story. Not for the launch-day runbook — use launch-day-conductor; not for finished per-channel copy — use content-writer or each discipline creative builder; not for launch-window battle cards — use sales-enablement-kit; this kit never adjudicates a claim. 叙事赋能包/电梯梯度/发言人问答/审定样板/该说不该说
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write a PR-FAQ for our launch", or "define the launch narrative and value pillars"; derives from the positioning canvas a message house — tagline, one-liner, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source]) — plus a working-backwards PR-FAQ narrative spine (launch-day tense, empty-chair test, five external + five internal FAQs) and per-channel message angle packs (angles, not finished copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for finished blog posts or pages — use content-writer; not for ad or email units — use each discipline creative builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 消息屋/PR-FAQ/价值支柱/发布叙事
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。