2,380 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Evaluates asset retirement and decommissioning liabilities with cost estimation, timing analysis, and funding adequacy assessment. Use when analyzing decommissioning costs, evaluating ARO exposure, or assessing abandonment liability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates factor crowding with positioning analysis, valuation spread monitoring, and unwind risk assessment. Use when analyzing factor crowding, assessing unwind risk, or monitoring factor valuation extremes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates ESG strategy with materiality assessment, stakeholder analysis, and value creation linkage for corporate decision-making. Use when analyzing ESG strategy, assessing material ESG factors, or linking sustainability to value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates market breadth with advance-decline analysis, new high/low tracking, and sector participation assessment. Use when analyzing market breadth, assessing rally quality, or identifying divergences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitors cross-asset correlation patterns with regime-dependent analysis and diversification effectiveness assessment. Use when analyzing correlations, assessing diversification, or evaluating cross-asset relationships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-based complexity assessment for task analysis. Use when determining the appropriate workflow, phases, and validation depth for a task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess source material against the ASDLC Knowledge Base and produce an evidence-calibrated Content Review Report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify a vendor or supplier of GxP-relevant software or services. Covers vendor risk classification, assessment questionnaire design, desk and on-site audit approaches, quality agreement evaluation, SLA review, and ongoing monitoring cadence definition. Use when selecting a new vendor for a GxP-critical system, onboarding a cloud provider for regulated data, performing a periodic re-qualification, when a vendor audit finding requires re-assessment, or when EU Annex 11 or ICH Q10 requires supplier qualification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review software architecture for coupling, cohesion, SOLID principles, API design, scalability, and technical debt. Covers system-level evaluation, architecture decision record review, and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating a proposed architecture before implementation, assessing an existing system for scalability or security, reviewing ADRs, performing a technical debt assessment, or evaluating readiness for significant scale-up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review user experience and interface design using Nielsen's heuristics, WCAG 2.1 accessibility guidelines, keyboard and screen reader audit, user flow analysis, cognitive load assessment, and form usability evaluation. Use when conducting a usability review before release, assessing WCAG 2.1 accessibility compliance, evaluating user flows for efficiency, reviewing form design, or performing a heuristic evaluation of an existing interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a peer review of research methodology, experimental design, and manuscript quality. Covers methodology evaluation, statistical appropriateness, reproducibility assessment, bias identification, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing a manuscript, preprint, or internal research report, evaluating a research proposal or study protocol, assessing evidence quality behind a claim, or reviewing a thesis chapter or dissertation section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare an organisation for regulatory inspection by assessing readiness against agency-specific focus areas (FDA, EMA, MHRA). Covers warning letter and 483 theme analysis, mock inspection protocols, document bundle preparation, inspection logistics, and response template creation. Use when a regulatory inspection has been announced or is anticipated, when a periodic self-assessment is due, when new systems have been implemented since the last inspection, or after a significant audit finding that may attract regulatory attention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Observe and assess a garden using a structured sensory protocol adapted from Coordinate Remote Viewing. Covers pre-entry clearing (meditate checkpoint), Stage I gestalt impression, Stage II sensory layer (leaf, stem, root, soil), Stage III pattern recognition with AOL management, and garden health triage matrix (heal checkpoint). Use before any intervention, when plants show stress symptoms, at seasonal transitions, when evaluating a new garden site, during regular health monitoring, or after extreme weather events such as frost or heat waves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cultivate defensive situational awareness, threat assessment, and mental clarity under pressure. Covers the Cooper color code awareness system, body language reading and intent detection, verbal de-escalation, moving mindfulness in public spaces, combat focus and the OODA loop, rapid grounding techniques for acute stress, context-specific integration, and ongoing review and refinement of awareness skills. Use when entering unfamiliar or potentially hostile environments, needing to assess a situation for safety, de-escalating a verbal confrontation, or integrating awareness practice into daily movement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage change control for validated computerized systems. Covers change request triage (emergency, standard, minor), impact assessment on validated state, revalidation scope determination, approval workflows, implementation tracking, and post-change verification. Use when a validated system requires a software upgrade, patch, or configuration change; when infrastructure changes affect validated systems; when a CAPA requires system modification; or when emergency changes need expedited approval and retrospective documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Field identification of fungi using morphological features, spore prints, habitat analysis, and seasonal context with a safety-first approach. Covers cap, gill, stem, and spore characteristics, look-alike differentiation, toxicity risk assessment, and the critical rule of absolute certainty before consumption. Use when encountering an unknown fungus, foraging for edible mushrooms and needing to confirm species before consumption, assessing whether fungi in a garden or property are harmful, or differentiating an edible species from a dangerous look-alike.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess an open-source agent framework for investment readiness by evaluating community health, supersession risk, architecture alignment, and governance sustainability. Produces a four-tier classification (INVEST / EVALUATE-FURTHER / CONTRIBUTE-CAUTIOUSLY / AVOID) to guide resource allocation decisions before committing engineering effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and maintain a library collection through acquisitions, weeding (deaccessioning), collection assessment, reader advisory, and interlibrary loan coordination. Covers selection criteria, collection development policies, the CREW/MUSTIE method for weeding, usage analysis, and responsive collection management. Use when building a new collection with a defined scope and budget, assessing an existing collection for gaps or outdated materials, when shelves are overcrowded and systematic weeding is needed, or when establishing a formal collection development policy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct temperament-based health assessment from Hildegard von Bingen's Causae et Curae. Evaluates the four temperaments (sanguine, choleric, melancholic, phlegmatic), elemental correspondences (air, fire, earth, water), and provides dietary and lifestyle recommendations for rebalancing. Use when understanding constitutional type in Hildegardian terms, experiencing imbalance (fatigue, digestive issues, mental fog) needing holistic guidance, seeking dietary recommendations by temperament, or researching medieval humoral medicine.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit project dependencies for version staleness, security vulnerabilities, and compatibility issues. Covers lock file analysis, upgrade path planning, and breaking change assessment. Use before a release to ensure dependencies are current and secure, during periodic maintenance reviews, after receiving a security advisory, when upgrading to a new language version, before submitting to CRAN or npm, or when inheriting a project to assess its dependency health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate current trail conditions including weather, snow line, river crossings, exposure, and trail maintenance status for safety decision-making. Produces a GREEN/YELLOW/RED safety rating with actionable go/no-go recommendations. Use the day before or morning of a planned hike, during tour planning to assess seasonal viability, after unexpected weather changes on a multi-day tour, when reports suggest trail damage or closures, or before committing to an alpine or exposed route.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when analyzing sector and industry performance charts to assess market positioning and rotation patterns. Use this skill when the user provides performance chart images (1-week or 1-month timeframes) for sectors or industries and requests market cycle assessment, sector rotation analysis, or strategic positioning recommendations based on performance data. All analysis and output are conducted in English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。