「benchmark」の検索結果

Use this skill when the user is measuring GPU-kernel-initiated RDMA WRITE latency through doca-gpunetio — building and running the `gpunetio_ib_write_lat` client + server pair under `doca/tools/gpunetio_ib_write_lat/`, checking GPU-NIC pairing, reading the half-iter / full-iter / CUDA-side usec columns, characterizing median / p99 / jitter for a real-time control loop, picking GPUNetIO vs GPI vs CPU-initiated `perftest`, or weighing the latency-vs-batching trade-off. Trigger even without 'GPUNetIO' or 'ib_write_lat': 'GPU kernel RDMA latency benchmark', 'how fast can a CUDA kernel post a WRITE', 'p99 RDMA latency on H100 + ConnectX', 'kernel-launched WR tail latency', or 'compare GPU-init vs CPU-init perftest'. Route elsewhere for bandwidth runs (doca-gpunetio-ib-write-bw), the GPI surface (doca-gpi), library debugging (doca-gpunetio), or DOCA install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to bring a supported object-detection vision model from HuggingFace or NVIDIA NGC into an NVIDIA DeepStream pipeline with end-to-end automation: ONNX download, SafeTensors export, TRT engine build, custom nvinfer bbox parser, multi-stream benchmark, and PDF report. Object detection models only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang everyday observability — the always-on signals in production. Covers structured logging with slog, Prometheus metrics, OpenTelemetry distributed tracing, continuous profiling with pprof/Pyroscope, server-side RUM event tracking, alerting, and Grafana dashboards. Apply when instrumenting Go services for production monitoring, setting up metrics or alerting, adding OpenTelemetry tracing, correlating logs with traces, migrating legacy loggers (zap/logrus/zerolog) to slog, adding observability to new features, or implementing GDPR/CCPA-compliant tracking with Customer Data Platforms (CDP). Not for temporary deep-dive performance investigation (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark` and `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance` skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Golang skills orchestrator — always active on any Golang coding, review, debug, or setup task. Reads the task context and loads the most relevant skills from samber/cc-skills-golang, often multiple at once: writing a gRPC service loads golang-grpc + golang-testing + golang-error-handling; debugging a panic loads golang-troubleshooting + golang-safety; auditing security loads golang-security + golang-lint + golang-safety. Also: disambiguates competing clusters when two skills seem to overlap (performance vs benchmark vs troubleshooting, samber/lo vs mo vs ro, DI cluster, safety vs security), and configures the project's agent-config file (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, Cursor rules, or Copilot instructions) to force-trigger skills in a project (/golang-how-to configure).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, improve, and evaluate agent skills (SKILL.md plus reference files). Use this skill whenever the user wants to build, scaffold, or design a new skill, improve or fix an existing skill that isn't working well, score or benchmark a skill's quality or run evals on it, or turn a repeated manual workflow into a skill ("I keep doing X manually", "can you remember how to do X", "turn this into a skill").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze how a private SaaS company's ARR valuation multiple changed across funding rounds, and attribute the compression or expansion to rate cycles and macro selloffs, growth deceleration, narrative shifts (including an AI premium), competition, and investor demand, benchmarked against private-market medians and peers. Use this skill whenever the user asks about valuation compression, ARR multiples, round-to-round valuation or multiple changes, down rounds, or wants to compare a VC-backed software company's funding rounds. Research the rounds rather than answering from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Onboard a new model generation or sibling into oh-my-hermes: probe router recognition, research the official contract, write trait-to-counter calibration, place routing in both lanes, price from documented list only, gate machine config on a served route, prove with the gates, close with a benchmark pair. Use when a model family ships a new generation (for example "Fable 5.1 is out", "GLM 5.4 shipped", "onboard new model", "add model to chains").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when needing clinical significance, pathogenicity classifications (e.g., Pathogenic, Benign, VUS), clinical evidence rationales, or finding "hard positive" benchmark controls for human genomic variants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM & VLM evaluation suite for home security AI applications

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VLM indoor safety hazard detection benchmark inspired by HomeSafeBench (arXiv 2509.23690)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VLM evaluation suite for video anomaly detection in smart home camera footage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze competitors" or "竞品分析"; benchmarks competitor keywords, content, backlinks, AI citations, and traffic share into strengths, weaknesses, and an action plan. Not for a pairwise topic-coverage gap map — use content-gap-analysis. 竞品分析/竞争对手

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "track competitor influencer marketing", "see who my rivals partner with", or "benchmark my influencer program"; produces a competitor partnership roster, campaign and content-strategy breakdown, performance estimates, and a gap/opportunity list. Not for finding your own new creators — use influencer-discovery. 竞品达人合作追踪/竞品营销分析

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze influencer campaign performance", "compare influencers", or "find what content worked"; produces metric scorecards vs target and benchmark, platform/influencer/content rankings, engagement-quality and sentiment reads, conversion-attribution breakdowns, and ranked learnings. Not for dollar-level return math — use roi-calculator. 达人营销效果分析/投放复盘

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement load testing, auto-scaling, and capacity planning for Claude API. Use when running performance benchmarks, planning for traffic spikes, or configuring horizontal scaling for Claude-powered services. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic load test", "claude scaling", "anthropic capacity planning", "scale claude api".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate Expo skills in this repo end-to-end - trigger accuracy, generated code quality, and runtime screenshots on iOS simulator and Android emulator via Expo Go (web optional). Use when the user wants to eval an Expo skill, test that a skill produces working code, benchmark a skill with device screenshots, or verify a skill's output renders correctly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build native-feeling, benchmark-quality mobile app screens (Expo / React Native). Use when designing or implementing any mobile UI — screens, flows, onboarding, paywalls, tab bars, sheets, settings, empty states — or when polishing motion, navigation, typography, dark mode, or perceived performance. Enforces Apple HIG fidelity, semantic colors, native controls, anti-slop discipline, navigation semantics (push vs replace, modal vs sheet vs overlay, the one-way doors where back must not exist), purposeful Reanimated motion, a full-motion simulator-verified iteration loop, and a study-real-apps-first workflow (pairs with the Appllama MCP). Trigger on "build a screen", "make this screen better", "design the onboarding", "wire up this flow", "polish the UI", "make it feel native", or any mobile design/implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React-specific code shape in the Grida editor. Hooks cannot be tested or benchmarked and silently break tuned UX under layered composition, so they are barred from the engine and main system — load-bearing logic lives in classes and namespaces, hooks only as thin edge wires. `data-testid` follows component-root discipline: one per significant component, not scattered. Use when authoring React in `editor/grida-canvas-react/`, `editor/components/`, `editor/scaffolds/`, or `editor/app/*`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

对目标话题进行初步调研，生成调研outline。用于学术调研、benchmark调研、技术选型等场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct preliminary research on a topic and generate research outline. For academic research, benchmark research, technology selection, etc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。