「can」の検索結果

Scan stocks for bullish trends using technical indicators (SMA, RSI, MACD, ADX). Use when user asks to scan for bullish stocks, find trending stocks, or rank symbols by momentum.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements automated PII discovery and classification using tools like Microsoft Purview, BigID, OneTrust DataDiscovery, and AWS Macie. Covers scanning schedules, accuracy tuning, false positive management, and integration patterns. Keywords: data discovery, PII scanning, Purview, BigID, Macie, OneTrust, automated classification, data cataloging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Student weekly assignment planner for Canvas LMS. Shows all due dates, submission status, grades, and peer reviews across all courses. Use when a student says "what's due", "plan my week", "weekly check", or wants to organize their coursework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learning designer quality check for Canvas LMS courses. Audits module structure, content completeness, publishing state, date consistency, and rubric coverage. Use when asked to "QC a course", "is this course ready", "pre-semester check", or "quality review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educator peer review management for Canvas LMS. Tracks completion rates, analyzes comment quality, flags problematic reviews, sends targeted reminders, and generates instructor-ready reports. Trigger phrases include "peer review status", "how are peer reviews going", "who hasn't reviewed", "review quality", or any peer review follow-up task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk grading workflows for Canvas LMS assignments using rubrics. Covers single grading, batch grading, and code execution strategies with safety-first dry runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educator morning course health check for Canvas LMS. Shows submission rates, struggling students, grade distribution, and upcoming deadlines. Trigger phrases include "morning check", "course status", "how are my students", or any start-of-day teaching review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold complete Canvas LMS course structures from specs, templates, or existing courses. Creates modules, pages, assignments, and discussions in bulk. Use when asked to "build a course", "scaffold modules", "create course structure", "set up a new course", or "copy course structure".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen US stocks using William O'Neil's CANSLIM growth stock methodology. Use when user requests CANSLIM stock screening, growth stock analysis, momentum stock identification, or wants to find stocks with strong earnings and price momentum following O'Neil's investment system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ApplicantStack integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with ApplicantStack data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan project dependencies for known vulnerabilities, generate software bills of materials, and enforce license compliance across the software supply chain. Use when the user requests dependency scanning or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Cancer Biologist. Use when a task calls for Cancer Biologist judgment. Reasons from hallmark capabilities, clonal evolution, and TME context; separates driver from passenger, cell-autonomous from stromal mechanisms, and 2D artifacts from PDO/PDX-validated dependencies using TCGA, DepMap, OncoKB, and REMARK-grade biomarker logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review lean canvas deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for lean canvas planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, implement, or review json canvas work with format, accessibility, performance, and visual-verification controls. Use when the requested deliverable depends on json canvas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An inspired interpretation of Shopifi's design language — a cinematic commerce platform that runs two parallel design tracks. The marketing-hero and product-narrative pages live on near-black canvases with full-bleed photography of merchants, giant Neue Haas Grotesk display type at thin weights, and a single black-pill CTA stroked in white. The transactional pages (pricing, signup, dashboards) flip to a cream-mint canvas with pastel aloe and pistachio greens, the same pill button vocabulary, and Inter for UI body. The two tracks share typographic DNA but diverge sharply in canvas polarity — and that choice is the brand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test AI/LLM features that ship in your product. Covers prompt regression testing, response quality evaluation, tool-call validation, hallucination and RAG grounding checks, nondeterministic-output strategies, red-team/safety scans, eval frameworks, and agent-as-target injection (indirect injection via tool output / RAG / scan reports, self-propagating payloads, data exfiltration via an agent) plus a bundled detector for untrusted content. Use when: "test our LLM feature," "prompt regression test," "eval framework," "hallucination test," "RAG grounding," "nondeterministic output," "AI feature testing," "red-team our chatbot," "indirect prompt injection," "agent reading untrusted tool output," "production AI quality." Not for: using AI to generate your own test code — use ai-test-generation. Not for: classifying CI failures with AI — use ai-bug-triage. Not for: EU AI Act / GDPR conformity of an AI feature — use compliance-testing. Not for: canary/flag rollout of an AI feature — use testing-in-production. Related: ai-test-generation, ai-qa-review, api-testing, compliance-testing, security-testing, risk-based-testing, test-data-management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vulnerability audit and dataflow analysis built on the neug CPG engine. file_audit (default, recommended): first builds a function-level summary graph (tier1) over the entire project, then incrementally builds detailed CPGs (tier2) on demand for chosen functions; both tiers coexist in a single neug database (unified schema, cross-layer refines edges; C/Java/Python/Rust). All capabilities are exposed as CLI tool subcommands (audit/overview/build/query/methods/paths), so an agent can drive the audit step by step via shell; the audit subcommand can also run the built-in LLM loop. The same tooling also supports a dataflow analysis mode (Workflow C): no vulnerability hunting, only variable-level dataflow tracing for functions of interest, producing dataflow_analysis.json. repo_audit: multi-round LLM/Cypher audit over a full-repo CPG. Use when the user asks to audit a codebase/project for vulnerabilities, scan a project with CPG/neug, run repo_audit/file_audit, find source-to-sink taint paths, or analyze dataflow inside a function. Supports C, Java, Python, and Rust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and manage product feedback with Canny. Use when a user asks to set up a feature request board, prioritize product feedback, build a public roadmap, or let users vote on features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a controlled experiment (A/B test) so its result can be trusted: writes the hypothesis, picks one primary metric and the guardrails, computes sample size and run time, specifies how visitors are assigned and when exposure is logged, and reads out the result with a confidence interval. Use when someone says "set up an A/B test", "split test this page", "how many visitors do I need", "how long should the experiment run", "is this result significant", "can I stop the test early", or wants to test a headline, price, layout or onboarding change against the current version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

语音转文字 (ASR) (语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。) Master OS — automated mastery of 语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 语音转文字 (ASR / 语音识别 / Speech-to-Text) 应用工程 (从业者视角) — 选型、集成、优化语音转文字能力，尤其面向移动端、低成本、快速识别的场景。覆盖: (a) 引擎/API 地图 — 云端 API(OpenAI gpt-4o-transcribe / Whisper API、Deepgram、AssemblyAI、Google / Azure / AWS Transcribe、讯飞、字节火山、阿里、腾讯、百度) vs 开源模型(Whisper / faster-whisper / whisper.cpp / distil-whisper、NVIDIA NeMo Parakeet / Canary、阿里 FunASR / Paraformer / SenseVoice、Moonshine、Vosk、Kaldi / k2 / icefall) vs 端侧·移动 SDK(whisper.cpp + CoreML / Metal、iOS Speech framework、Android SpeechRecognizer、Picovoice、SenseVoice 端侧); (b) 准确率(WER / CER) × 延迟(RTF / 流式) × 成本 三角权衡与选型决策树; (c) 成本优化 playbook — 端侧免费 / 批量折扣 / VAD 裁静音 / 量化(int8 / ggml) / 蒸馏 / 自托管 break-even; (d) 移动端集成 — 端侧 vs 云、流式 vs 批量、断点检测(endpointing)、隐私 / 离线; (e) 后处理 — 标点 / 数字规整(ITN) / 说话人分离(diarization) / 时间戳。学派分歧: 云 API vs 端侧自托管、通用大模型(Whisper) vs 专用流式(RNN-T / Conformer)、闭源 API vs 开源、准确率派 vs 成本派、英文优先 vs 中文 ASR(FunASR / SenseVoice / 讯飞)。不含: 文字转语音(TTS / 语音合成，方向相反)、声纹识别 / 说话人验证为主业、语音 agent / 对话式 AI、ASR 模型训练科研深水区。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「语音转文字」「语音识别」「asr」「speech to text」「stt」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在小红书做『AI 赛道』内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写文案、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) AI 赛道选题 — AI 工具测评 / AI 绘画 / AI 教程与 prompt / AI 副业变现 / AI 资讯解读 / AI 效率，按小红书用户(偏年轻女性 + 泛知识)重构选题; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 封面(第一眼/大字报/对比图)、标题(数字/痛点/好奇缺口/关键词前置)、正文(钩子开头/分点/口语化/emoji/利他价值)、标签与 SEO 关键词、CTA 与互动引导、人设 voice; (c) 内容制作工作流 — 选题(对标爆款/找选题)→标题封面→脚本或正文→制作(图文/口播/录屏/数字人)→标签发布→数据复盘迭代; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 文案(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/GPT)、生图(即梦/MJ/可图)、口播数字人、剪辑(剪映)、封面(Canva/创可贴)、选题与 SEO(新红/千瓜/灰豚); (e) 平台机制与起号 — 推荐算法(收藏率/互动率/完播/搜索)、薯条投放、违禁词/限流/避坑、起号与涨粉、垂直度; (f) 变现(次要) — 蒲公英广告 / 知识付费 / 引流私域 / AI 工具带货。学派分歧: 图文 vs 短视频、干货教程 vs 测评种草 vs 资讯搬运、真人出镜 vs 数字人/无人起号、原创 vs 搬运洗稿、AI 全自动批量 vs AI 辅助精做。不含: 通用小红书运营(已有 xiaohongshu-ops skill, 本 skill 聚焦 AI 赛道 + 文案/内容生产)、电商带货全流程、其他平台、AI 工具本身的技术原理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在小红书做『AI 赛道』内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写文案、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) AI 赛道选题 — AI 工具测评 / AI 绘画 / AI 教程与 prompt / AI 副业变现 / AI 资讯解读 / AI 效率，按小红书用户(偏年轻女性 + 泛知识)重构选题; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 封面(第一眼/大字报/对比图)、标题(数字/痛点/好奇缺口/关键词前置)、正文(钩子开头/分点/口语化/emoji/利他价值)、标签与 SEO 关键词、CTA 与互动引导、人设 voice; (c) 内容制作工作流 — 选题(对标爆款/找选题)→标题封面→脚本或正文→制作(图文/口播/录屏/数字人)→标签发布→数据复盘迭代; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 文案(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/GPT)、生图(即梦/MJ/可图)、口播数字人、剪辑(剪映)、封面(Canva/创可贴)、选题与 SEO(新红/千瓜/灰豚); (e) 平台机制与起号 — 推荐算法(收藏率/互动率/完播/搜索)、薯条投放、违禁词/限流/避坑、起号与涨粉、垂直度; (f) 变现(次要) — 蒲公英广告 / 知识付费 / 引流私域 / AI 工具带货。学派分歧: 图文 vs 短视频、干货教程 vs 测评种草 vs 资讯搬运、真人出镜 vs 数字人/无人起号、原创 vs 搬运洗稿、AI 全自动批量 vs AI 辅助精做。不含: 通用小红书运营(已有 xiaohongshu-ops skill, 本 skill 聚焦 AI 赛道 + 文案/内容生产)、电商带货全流程、其他平台、AI 工具本身的技术原理。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 小红书 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在小红书做『AI 赛道』内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写文案、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) AI 赛道选题 — AI 工具测评 / AI 绘画 / AI 教程与 prompt / AI 副业变现 / AI 资讯解读 / AI 效率，按小红书用户(偏年轻女性 + 泛知识)重构选题; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 封面(第一眼/大字报/对比图)、标题(数字/痛点/好奇缺口/关键词前置)、正文(钩子开头/分点/口语化/emoji/利他价值)、标签与 SEO 关键词、CTA 与互动引导、人设 voice; (c) 内容制作工作流 — 选题(对标爆款/找选题)→标题封面→脚本或正文→制作(图文/口播/录屏/数字人)→标签发布→数据复盘迭代; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 文案(豆包/Kimi/DeepSeek/GPT)、生图(即梦/MJ/可图)、口播数字人、剪辑(剪映)、封面(Canva/创可贴)、选题与 SEO(新红/千瓜/灰豚); (e) 平台机制与起号 — 推荐算法(收藏率/互动率/完播/搜索)、薯条投放、违禁词/限流/避坑、起号与涨粉、垂直度; (f) 变现(次要) — 蒲公英广告 / 知识付费 / 引流私域 / AI 工具带货。学派分歧: 图文 vs 短视频、干货教程 vs 测评种草 vs 资讯搬运、真人出镜 vs 数字人/无人起号、原创 vs 搬运洗稿、AI 全自动批量 vs AI 辅助精做。不含: 通用小红书运营(已有 xiaohongshu-ops skill, 本 skill 聚焦 AI 赛道 + 文案/内容生产)、电商带货全流程、其他平台、AI 工具本身的技术原理。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「小红书 ai 博主」「小红书 ai 自媒体」「小红书 ai 赛道」「小红书爆款文案」「小红书 ai 教程」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。