「candidate」の検索結果

Point Cowork at a folder of resumes plus a job description -- screens every candidate against the actual requirements, produces a ranked shortlist with evidence, drafts advance/decline emails, and builds interview kits for the top picks. Pairs with hiring-scorecard for the interview stage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes substantive ML, AI, data, scientific-computing, and software-engineering requests to the smallest useful set of managed repository skills. Invoke proactively when a request names or implies a package, framework, model family, dataset, modality, workflow, backend, deployment target, evaluation method, or implementation approach that may benefit from repository guidance, even if no repository is named. Narrow progressively from area to family to repository root: inspect only the one or two most likely area pages; compare candidates by capability, task surface, model/data format, training versus inference versus evaluation intent, runtime constraints, and root-skill description; then open only the selected root and relevant sub-skills, references, or scripts. Select multiple repositories only when each adds a distinct capability. Do not load the whole collection, treat dependencies or incidental integrations as capabilities, choose by name alone, or force a match when no exact taxonomy family applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an openai-guardrails-python release plan or final release candidate against the previous remote tag, determine the compatible release type, audit runtime and packaging risk, inspect current CI, and produce an English ship-or-block report. Use for pre-release readiness checks, not ordinary PR review or implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and inspect the installed Blueish Blender Asset Library without mutating it. Use when a user asks for a local Blender asset, node preset, Blueish asset, Asset Browser entry, or named source, or when the Router has selected a node-centric/reusable Geometry Nodes, material, simulation, rigging, compositor, or NPR route with eligible local catalogs; return compatible, attributable candidates for the Router-approved workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a vague research direction and wants to explore feasible specific topics. Outputs a structured analysis with candidate topics, innovation/feasibility scoring, and a pre-survey of 20–30 representative works. Single-stage, no Python runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect an unfamiliar repository, interpret a broad Markdown user journey at runtime, operate the real product through its supported web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile surface, and produce an auditable pass, fail, or blocked judgment with screenshots, logs, recordings, and a step timeline when available. Use when asked to run smoke tests, validate an end-to-end user journey, dogfood a product, test a release candidate, or execute a non-deterministic workflow that may include authentication or human checkpoints. Do not use as a substitute for deterministic unit, integration, or scenario tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, refine, compare, and when needed validate distinctive names for startups, AI products, developer tools, protocols, open-source projects, apps, product families, local businesses, services, companies, nonprofits, and other organizations. Use when asked to name or rename a business, brand, product, venture, shop, studio, or organization; derive a name from an existing project or concept; create a company and product naming system; compare candidates; or check company, domain, package, repository, marketplace, or trademark conflicts. Default to a fast no-browse creative pass; use current validation when the user requests availability or research, or is choosing a final name. Do not claim legal clearance, purchase domains, or present stale or unverified availability as fact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve relevant information from a knowledge base using semantic, keyword, or hybrid search to ground a query. Use when the task starts with a corpus or index that must be searched; use context-ranking when candidate chunks already exist and only need ordering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank an existing set of context chunks by relevance, diversity, freshness, and utility. Use when retrieval has already produced candidates that must be scored or reranked; use context-retrieval when the source corpus still needs to be searched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize a complete candidate context package by deduplicating, filtering, ordering, and allocating its token budget. Use when retrieved or assembled material is noisy or exceeds the useful context budget; use context-ranking for scoring chunks and context-compression for shrinking selected content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing workflow skill for finding high-value test candidates, writing focused tests, generating realistic workloads, reviewing test value, and diagnosing test-suite health. Use for prompts about what to test next, adding or improving tests, reviewing whether a test is worth keeping, low-signal or flaky tests, workload scenarios, or test-suite trust. Do not use for general QA discussion unless the user wants a concrete testing workflow or artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source technical and professional talent by combining LinkedIn profiles, GitHub contributions, and company intelligence. Identifies candidates with specific skills, assesses expertise depth, and provides outreach context for recruiting teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves GWAS associations to candidate causal variants and credible sets via SuSiE, susie_rss, FINEMAP, CAVIAR, DAP-G, PAINTOR, PolyFun, SuSiEx, MultiSuSiE, and FOCUS. Use when narrowing a GWAS lead SNP to a 95 percent credible set, choosing between in-sample and reference LD, calibrating non-sparse loci with SuSiE-inf or FINEMAP-inf, integrating functional priors via PolyFun, fine-mapping across ancestries with SuSiEx, diagnosing LD mismatch via estimate_s_rss and kriging_rss, handling HLA or long-range LD, or feeding credible sets into coloc.susie for colocalization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end post-GWAS causal inference pipeline orchestrating heritability partitioning, genetic correlation, Mendelian randomization with CHP-aware sensitivity (CAUSE / LHC-MR), colocalization, fine-mapping with SuSiE / FOCUS, mediation, TWAS triangulation, cis-pQTL drug-target MR, effector-gene prioritization (L2G / PoPS / cS2G), and GenomicSEM common-factor GWAS. Use when triangulating causal inference across multiple complementary methods, prioritizing tissues via stratified LDSC, nominating or de-risking drug targets, mapping a lead SNP to a candidate effector gene, modeling shared genetic architecture across correlated traits, or producing a STROBE-MR-compliant publication-grade evidence battery from GWAS summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the most valuable commercial insight and the monetization point closest to lawful revenue for a project, product, service, website, community, content account, open-source tool, or business idea. Use when a user asks how to monetize, who pays, why people do not buy, what to charge, whether to keep building, what to stop, what to do next, or asks to continue or deepen an earlier business analysis. Answer the user's actual question before asking for more information and carry the analysis forward without repeating it. When the buyer, purchased result, or delivery ability is unknown, do not select them from industry stereotypes; use explicit conditional candidates and an evidence-gathering next step. Not for investment advice, income forecasts, get-rich-quick schemes, or guaranteed results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cheat-on-skill 的核心。为用户选定的某个候选岗位生成个性化学习策略：差距分析 → 分阶段学习路径（资源+里程碑）→ 作品集清单 → 求职时间线 → 止损线。强调 AI 加速学习、诚实周期、可验证里程碑。触发词："我选XX做学习计划"/"这个岗位怎么学"/"给我学习路径"/"skill plan"/"制定转型策略"。前置：该岗位最好已在 skill-scan 的 candidate_roles 里、判定为可学。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe refactoring workflow using trace-mcp — assess risk, find candidates, check impact, and rename symbols across all files without missing import sites or cross-file references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection, auto-merge candidates, labeling). Also covers creating, inspecting, and repairing a CodeScope index. Use for: code structure, who calls what, why something changed, similar functions, module boundaries, bug tracing, class relationships, PR risk/conflicts, or any question benefiting from a code knowledge graph. Applies when a `.codegraph` index exists in the workspace, or when the user wants to create one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the public interface of a module before any implementation exists: writes the caller scenarios first, produces three candidates with genuinely different shapes, type-checks each one against the scenarios, scores them on measurable criteria and records the decision. Use when someone says "design the API for this module", "what should this signature look like", "compare interface options", "this function is awkward to call", "show me alternatives before I build it", or is about to add a module, library entry point, endpoint or command that other code will depend on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides a founder from real decisions to a short set of written company values that people can act on: collects incidents, tests each candidate value, writes it as a trade-off with behaviors and a story, and wires it into hiring, feedback and promotion. Use when someone asks to "define our company values", "write a values document", "our values are generic, fix them", "turn our values into interview questions", "what should our culture be before we hire", or wants to check whether the team lives the values it has. Produces VALUES.md, an evidence log and an interview kit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master the AI tools that transform hiring and HR operations. From sourcing candidates to onboarding, find and retain great talent faster. Use when "hiring, recruiting, HR, talent, performance management, hr, recruiting, hiring, talent, people" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query visual scientific figure references, show candidates for human preference selection, export selected reference bundles, and guide plotting agents from human-selected visual examples to code action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。