「classification」の検索結果

This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure ACSets better than authors via surjectivity gadgets, Betti numbers, Möbius classification, and p-adic ultrametric distance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify changed prose files into review tiers before deciding SKIP. Use when reviewing a diff containing prose files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs several language models as independent coders on the same labeling or discovery task and reads their disagreement as data — panel assembly for model diversity, keeping votes independent, consensus rules, agreement statistics (Cohen's and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff's alpha), the correlated-errors caveat that stops agreement being mistaken for validity, human validation beyond the panel, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, asks how to combine several models' labels, or asks what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text: discovery vs. measurement, STM/LDA/BERTopic choice, preprocessing, covariate formulas, choosing K across coherence, FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validating topics against human coding, robustness, and reporting. Coding against a fixed codebook goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess agentic layer maturity using the 12-grade classification system (Class 1-3). Use when evaluating codebase readiness, identifying next upgrade steps, or tracking progress toward the Codebase Singularity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

audioFlux is a deep learning tool library for audio and music analysis and feature extraction, supporting dozens of time-frequency transforms and hundreds of feature combinations for classification, separation, MIR, and ASR tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Credential operations: secret discovery, classification, extraction, conversion, offline cracking of hashes the operator already has as a credential job, policy-aware spraying, NetNTLM capture, generic SMB relay, and Windows/Linux harvest. Do not hijack an in-progress /ad-attack Kerberoast/AS-REP chain (that module cracks and uses the ticket itself). Do not DCSync, read LAPS LDAP, or escalate cloud IAM. Usable credentials are recorded; the operator chooses the next module.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explainability (XAI) audit for products containing AI components. Five-stage tier-scaled check: risk classification, stakeholder×question matrix, fidelity audit, system card, recourse path. Honest about what was validated functionally vs what needs user testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates mineral and hydrocarbon reserves with classification methodology, resource conversion rates, and valuation per unit analysis. Use when analyzing reserve reports, validating resource estimates, or assessing depletion profiles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured interactive questionnaire framework for gathering requirements from users. Uses A/B/C/D/E multiple choice patterns with additive vs exclusive question classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing published content (blog posts, social media, newsletters) for sentiment, structural quality, hook effectiveness, readability, topic classification, and engagement correlation. Invoke for daily post analysis, content audits, or engagement driver identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process external specifications through transformation, classification, gap analysis, component discovery, and decomposition. Creates workflow items with classified context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, classify, and selectively forget stored memories. Covers memory enumeration and classification by type/age/access frequency, staleness detection for outdated references, fidelity checks using external anchors, a decision tree for selective withdrawal, tombstoned deaccession so removed content stays recoverable, counter-memory inoculation for failed strategies that would otherwise be re-derived, preemptive filtering rules for what should never become memories, and an audit trail so forgetting itself is reviewable. Use when memory has grown large and uncurated, when project state has shifted significantly since memories were written, when retrieval quality has degraded, or as periodic maintenance alongside manage-memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement regenerative recovery using triage, scaffolding, and progressive rebuild. Covers damage assessment, wound classification, emergency stabilization, scar tissue management, and resilience strengthening for systems that have sustained structural damage. Use when a system has suffered an incident needing structured recovery, when a failed transformation left the system in a damaged intermediate state, when accumulated technical debt has caused partial failure, or when a system is functional but degraded and the degradation is worsening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify a vendor or supplier of GxP-relevant software or services. Covers vendor risk classification, assessment questionnaire design, desk and on-site audit approaches, quality agreement evaluation, SLA review, and ongoing monitoring cadence definition. Use when selecting a new vendor for a GxP-critical system, onboarding a cloud provider for regulated data, performing a periodic re-qualification, when a vendor audit finding requires re-assessment, or when EU Annex 11 or ICH Q10 requires supplier qualification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a hiking tour with trail selection by difficulty (SAC/UIAA), time estimation using Munter's formula, elevation analysis, and safety assessment. Covers multi-day hut-to-hut tours, day hikes, and alpine routes with terrain classification and group fitness considerations. Use when planning a day hike or multi-day trekking tour, selecting trails appropriate for a group's fitness and experience, estimating realistic hiking times, or planning hut-to-hut tours with overnight logistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and analyze discrete or continuous Markov chains including transition matrix construction, state classification, stationary distribution computation, and mean first passage times. Use when modeling a memoryless system with observed transition counts or rates, computing long-run steady-state probabilities, determining expected hitting times or absorption probabilities, classifying states as transient or recurrent, or building a foundation for hidden Markov models or reinforcement learning MDPs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify insects using body plan analysis, dichotomous keys to order, wing venation, mouthpart type, antennae form, leg and tarsal structure, and confidence levels. Covers the fundamental hexapod body plan verification, a simplified dichotomous key to major orders, wing venation and type analysis, mouthpart classification, antennae morphology, leg specialization and tarsal formula, and a structured confidence assessment framework. Use when you need to identify an unknown insect beyond preliminary order placement, are working through a specimen for taxonomic study, want to distinguish between similar orders or families, or need to assign a confidence level to a field identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。