「code quality」の検索結果

Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code quality assurance strategies. Parent skill for quality-related skills: security (security review) and debug (systematic debugging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and edit high-quality images using Google's Nano Banana Pro (Gemini 3 Pro Image) AI model. Use this skill when working with AI image generation or editing tasks including (1) Creating images from text prompts with professional quality, (2) Editing existing images with natural language instructions, (3) Multi-turn iterative image refinement, (4) Product photography and marketing visuals, (5) Creating infographics and diagrams with text, (6) Photorealistic and artistic image generation, (7) Batch image generation workflows, (8) Testing and troubleshooting Gemini image generation API. Supports up to 4K resolution, multiple aspect ratios, reference images, and advanced prompting techniques for cinema-quality results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch reviews to external companion AIs (Codex, Gemini, Claude) for an independent second opinion on code changes, PR readiness, doc completeness, architecture, or implementation status. Use when you want a fresh-eyes review beyond Claude-native. Trigger on "get a second opinion", "companion review", "review my changes", "review the PR". For Claude-only quality checks use /code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous cross-study meta-analysis of scRNA-seq data from ENCODE, integrating multiple single-cell transcriptomic datasets for a tissue/cell type. Use when the user wants to answer "what cell types exist in my tissue and what genes define them?" by combining scRNA-seq data across donors, labs, and platforms. Follows the Mawla et al. 2019 framework for assessing cross-study reproducibility, TIN-based quality filtering, and detection-limit-aware interpretation. Handles batch correction (Harmony/Seurat), dropout awareness, cross-contamination artifacts, and platform-specific biases. Use this skill for ANY scRNA-seq integration task, cross-dataset comparison, cell atlas construction, or reproducibility assessment involving ENCODE single-cell data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for visualizing ENCODE data including deeptools heatmaps, IGV screenshots, UCSC track hubs, and publication-quality plots. Use when users need to create visualizations of ChIP-seq signal, peak landscapes, genome browser views, or any visual representation of ENCODE data. Trigger on: heatmap, visualization, genome browser, track hub, IGV, deeptools, signal plot, peak visualization, profile plot, publication figure, bigWig visualization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic technical debt analysis across architecture, testing, documentation, and infrastructure. Investigates the codebase, scores findings by impact and effort, and generates a prioritized TECH_DEBT.md remediation plan. Delegates to specialized skills for code quality (scout) and linting (lint-fix). Use when assessing overall project health, planning cleanup sprints, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test frontend code: unit, component, E2E, visual regression, and accessibility tests with a sane pyramid. Use for reliable UI quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep code review with web research. Use when double-checking code against latest docs, verifying dependency versions, or reviewing security concerns. Complements automatic quality hook with ecosystem verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after completing any significant implementation work. Triggers: 'review work', 'review my work', 'review changes', 'QA my work', 'verify implementation', 'check my work', 'validate changes', 'post-implementation review'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks DRY/KISS/YAGNI/architecture compliance with quantitative Code Quality Score. Validates decisions via MCP Ref. Reports with SEC-/PERF-/MNT-/ARCH-/BP-/OPT- prefixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve or review ordinary dygo code changes for simplicity, focused scope, canonical ownership, clear boundaries, and verifiable behavior. Use for normal implementation and refactoring quality; use dygo-thermonuclear-review only for an explicitly severe audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive technical reviews of Ruby on Rails applications. Runs automated analysis tools (RubyCritic, Brakeman, bundler-audit, Gitleaks, Debride, linters, SimpleCov, Rails stats, Rails ERD), analyzes code for architecture, security, authorization (Pundit/CanCanCan), dead code, and design issues, and produces a structured markdown report with prioritized findings and a 0-10 score. Use when the user requests a tech review, code audit, project assessment, or quality analysis of a Rails application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces KISS/DRY/YAGNI during authoring and ad-hoc quality reviews. Pragmatic standards: concise, direct, no unnecessary comments. NOT for post-hoc diff/PR review (see mk:review); NOT for behavior-preserving simplification passes (see mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert between sequence file formats (FASTA, FASTQ, GenBank, EMBL, Stockholm) and re-encode FASTQ quality offsets using Biopython Bio.SeqIO. Use when changing a file format for a downstream tool, fixing FASTQ quality encoding (Phred+33 vs Phred+64 vs Solexa), or when a conversion risks silently dropping annotations or quality scores.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed code for YAGNI, removable over-complexity, reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then apply worthwhile simplifications. Use when the user asks to simplify, clean up, tighten, de-hack recent changes, identify logic that can be dropped, or review whether added safeguards and edge-case handling are actually needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan the codebase for common security issues: hardcoded secrets, SQL injection vectors, XSS, unvalidated inputs, and insecure defaults. Use before deploying, as part of code quality review, or when asked to check for security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find overly complex code: files over 300 lines, functions over 50 lines, deeply nested conditions (4+ levels), and magic numbers. Use for code quality reviews, pre-release checks, or when asked to assess code maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a diff needs a readability review — naming, single-responsibility, DRY, dead code, mismatch with codebase conventions — dispatched by /review-changes, /do-and-judge, /judge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。