「conflict」の検索結果

Dasel v3 selector patterns for Maven POM XML files — use when querying dependency versions, filtering by groupId or scope, extracting module hierarchy from parent POMs, or detecting version conflicts across enterprise multi-module Java projects. Load this skill when working with pom.xml files using dasel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grooms a GitHub milestone for parallel execution — batch-grooms ungroomed items, assesses scope gaps, analyzes cross-item dependencies via Impact Radius overlap, builds conflict groups, assigns items to execution waves, and persists the dispatch plan via dispatch_create_plan MCP tool. Calls dispatch_wave_start per wave to register state. Use when preparing a milestone for /work-milestone execution. Pass the milestone number as the first argument. Requires milestone items assigned via /group-items-to-milestone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when verifying information (fact, number, quote, event, statement) against authoritative primary sources, or cross-checking a number via one-level metric decomposition (Z = P × Q). Triggers: "verify X", "is this true", "find the original source", "where is this number from", "two sources disagree", "is it true X never did Y". Covers five scenarios: (1) basic truthfulness check, (2) completeness / out-of-context quoting, (3) one-level reasoning verification, (4) negative-statement handling, (5) multi-source conflict side-by-side output. Dig into whitelisted primary sources only (user-supplied files, official websites & databases, authoritative industry sources); cited reports / charts / datasets must be downloaded and read locally to count as verified — if download is blocked, hand the link to the user. If nothing can be found, plainly state "cannot verify" rather than guessing, patching, or citing secondary paraphrases. Always reply in the user's question language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, writing, or debugging Go code under exercises/part2/ (and matching embedded code in docs/part2/**/*.mdx). Thinks hard about correctness, idiomatic Go, error handling, resource cleanup, concurrency, and — crucially — what the tests would catch: edge cases, races, leaks, timeouts, and port conflicts. Knows the repo's module-mode quirk (GO111MODULE=off) and which dirs carry go.mod.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for parser differentials, HTTP normalization gaps, ambiguous headers, path decoding drift, transfer-framing mismatches, and request smuggling routes. Use when the user asks to trace proxy and backend parse differences, conflicting path normalization, Host or forwarded-header ambiguity, CL/TE issues, or routing outcomes that differ across hops. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end OCA module migration workflow for porting addons between Odoo major versions and preparing [MIG] pull requests. Use when migrating OCA modules, porting addons between Odoo versions, applying OCA migration checklists, resolving migration patch conflicts, or preparing versioned OCA migration PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before committing, opening a PR, or reporting a task done — when you want ground-truth confirmation there are no conflict markers, live-looking credentials, debug leftovers, untracked TODOs, or oversized files, without spending a model turn re-reading every file yourself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses ArgoCD application sync failures using the ArgoCD REST API and Kubernetes resource diff analysis. Identifies Helm value conflicts, Kustomize overlay errors, and resource health check failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates Ansible playbooks using ansible-lint with custom rule plugins and the Ansible Collections API. Checks for deprecated modules, missing handlers, insecure variable practices, and role dependency conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says 'why is my checkout broken', 'audit my woocommerce store', 'cart problems woocommerce', or 'losing sales woocommerce'. Diagnoses checkout and cart failures, AJAX mismatches, caching conflicts, payment gateway setup, and SSL enforcement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or optimizing CUDA kernels targeting sm_120a (RTX 5090 / Consumer Blackwell, GB202) in the imp inference engine. Triggers on CUDA/PTX kernel code, shared-memory layout, bank conflicts, tensor-core MMA (mxf4nvf4, tf32, 3xTF32/3xFP16), GEMV/GEMM/attention/quantization/GDN-scan kernels, decode tok/s under expected, kernel emitting HMMA instead of mxf4nvf4, occupancy, register pressure, __launch_bounds__, spills, PDL. Pair with `benchmark-cuda` for measurement and `check-degeneration` after hot-path changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates geopolitical risk impact on investment portfolios with sanctions exposure, conflict risk, and supply chain disruption analysis. Use when analyzing geopolitical risk, assessing sanctions impact, or evaluating political event exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Byzantine consensus voting for multi-agent decision making. Implements voting protocols, conflict resolution, and agreement algorithms for reaching consensus among multiple agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft RFIs and manage the ambient issue registry. Reviews issues surfaced by other skills, escalates to formal RFIs. Triggers: 'draft RFI', 'write RFI', 'drawing conflict', 'review issues', 'issue queue'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evolve SKILL.md files from agent execution traces using a three-stage pipeline: trajectory collection from observed runs, parallel multi-agent patch proposal for error and success analysis, and conflict-free consolidation of overlapping edits via prevalence-weighting. Based on the Trace2Skill methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trademark filing procedures covering EUIPO (EU), USPTO (US), and WIPO Madrid Protocol (international). Walks through pre-filing conflict checks, Nice classification, descriptiveness assessment, mark type decisions, filing basis strategy, office-specific e-filing procedures, Madrid Protocol extension, post- filing monitoring, and open-source trademark policy drafting. Use after running screen-trademark to confirm the mark is clear, when ready to secure trademark rights in one or more jurisdictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel SDLC batch runner. Analyzes a list of independent task descriptions, groups them by heuristic file-conflict prediction, dispatches one worktree-isolated background agent per task (each running the full pipeline-orchestrator: BA → Dev → QA → Sec → Docs), and aggregates results into a single batch summary. Use when: - `/sdlc:batch` invokes this skill after parsing its arguments (Step 2 of commands/batch.md) - You have 2+ independent feature/fix descriptions to run through the SDLC pipeline in parallel Do NOT use for: - A single task (use pipeline-orchestrator directly via /sdlc:start) - Tasks that must share a single working tree (this skill isolates each task in its own git worktree)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate complex development with AUTOMATIC parallel subagent execution, continuous dispatch scheduling, dependency analysis, file conflict detection, and IOSM quality gates. Analyzes task dependencies, builds critical path, launches parallel background workers with lock management, monitors progress, auto-spawns from discoveries. Use for multi-file features, parallel implementation streams, automated task decomposition, brownfield refactoring, or when user mentions "parallel agents", "orchestrate", "swarm", "continuous dispatch", "automatic scheduling", "PRD", "quality gates", "decompose work", "Mixed/brownfield".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when analyzing warp divergence, memory coalescing, shared memory bank conflicts, cache behavior, atomics, or occupancy tradeoffs on NVIDIA and AMD GPUs. Not for tool commands: use cuda-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when pinning down domain terminology, maintaining the domain model, or when a term conflicts or needs sharpening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a long session has accumulated stale or conflicting context or the user asks to refresh it. Not for remote, credential, publish, deploy, or irreversible changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。