「deep sea」の検索結果

Delegate complex, long-running tasks to Manus AI agent for autonomous execution. Use when user says 'use manus', 'delegate to manus', 'send to manus', 'have manus do', 'ask manus', 'check manus sessions', or when tasks require deep web research, market analysis, product comparisons, stock analysis, competitive research, document generation, data analysis, or multi-step workflows that benefit from autonomous agent execution with parallel processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

【深度调研专用】当需要系统性调研、多产品对比、深度分析、技术选型、趋势分析时必须使用本技能。触发关键词：调研、对比、分析、评估、选型、趋势、综合报告、多源验证。通过 3 层深度搜索（阅读多个网页）+ 多源交叉验证，提供比普通 WebSearch 更全面、更准确的研究结果和深度洞察。禁止用普通搜索工具替代深度调研任务。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refines an active research session by drilling deeper into a subtopic. Use after tome:research to narrow results to a specific channel or angle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides DeepMotionEditing BVH animation, skeleton-aware motion retargeting, motion style transfer, and Blender visualization workflows for research use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use DeepFace for face recognition, verification, embeddings, face detection, demographic analysis, datastore search, API serving, model selection, and troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research why neural architectures and training methods work through forward computation, geometry, gradients, optimization dynamics, historical experiments, and competing explanations. Use for deep mechanism questions about neural networks, AI models, layers, representations, or training; explain the meaning in plain language with evidence and explicit limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Ilya Sutskever (deep learning pioneer, co-founder of OpenAI and Safe Superintelligence Inc.) to problems involving AI architecture, scaling laws, alignment, and research strategy. Reach for this skill whenever discussing machine learning paradigms, the limits of compute and data, AGI timelines, superintelligence safety, or deciding between hardcoding vs. learning. Trigger this skill for questions about next-word prediction, reinforcement learning efficiency, generalization gaps, and transitioning from brute-force scaling to fundamental research, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the engineering and research philosophies of Jeff Dean, Chief Scientist at Google DeepMind and Google Research. Reach for this skill whenever you are designing large-scale distributed systems, optimizing latency and energy efficiency, or making architectural decisions about machine learning infrastructure. It should trigger automatically for topics involving hardware-ML co-design, model distillation, sparse activation, massively multi-task models, or scaling systems by 5x to 10x. Use this skill to evaluate system bottlenecks, transition from specialized to unified models, and optimize experimental velocity. Apply his mental models to avoid premature 100x scaling and to treat AI models as reasoning engines rather than memorization databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic multi-angle web research methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fan out a one-shot or flat parallel batch of cc-fleet PROVIDER subagents (headless `cc-fleet subagent`) that return a result — DeepSeek / GLM / Kimi / Qwen / MiniMax, or a Codex/Claude subscription. Trigger ONLY to delegate a task to a cc-fleet provider worker (parallel research, bulk per-file work, a specialized model). Do NOT trigger for a multi-phase pipeline (that is /cc-fleet:workflow), for ordinary local shell/coding, or for editing or researching cc-fleet's own code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search vault notes by keyword or meaning. Args: <query>. Uses QMD (lex, vec, deep search).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the engineering and research philosophies of Jeff Dean, Chief Scientist at Google DeepMind and Google Research. Reach for this skill whenever you are designing large-scale distributed systems, optimizing latency and energy efficiency, or making architectural decisions about machine learning infrastructure. It should trigger automatically for topics involving hardware-ML co-design, model distillation, sparse activation, massively multi-task models, or scaling systems by 5x to 10x. Use this skill to evaluate system bottlenecks, transition from specialized to unified models, and optimize experimental velocity. Apply his mental models to avoid premature 100x scaling and to treat AI models as reasoning engines rather than memorization databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Ilya Sutskever (deep learning pioneer, co-founder of OpenAI and Safe Superintelligence Inc.) to problems involving AI architecture, scaling laws, alignment, and research strategy. Reach for this skill whenever discussing machine learning paradigms, the limits of compute and data, AGI timelines, superintelligence safety, or deciding between hardcoding vs. learning. Trigger this skill for questions about next-word prediction, reinforcement learning efficiency, generalization gaps, and transitioning from brute-force scaling to fundamental research, even if the user doesn't explicitly name him.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research with scoped depth and counterevidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skills for accessing and searching docs in DeepWiki/GitHub’s public code repositories can help users understand open-source project source codes, and users can also ask questions directly about the code docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relationship-first networking skill for identifying the right people to connect with and drafting value-add outreach — not sales, not referral asks. Use when building a network for a job search, career pivot, partnership, or industry access. Covers target identification by purpose, deep LinkedIn + web research on a specific person, brainstorming 10 value-add angles, and drafting three outreach formats: cold networking email (max 200 words), LinkedIn connection request (max 300 characters), and hiring manager follow-up email (120–160 words). Never drafts generic openers or referral asks — always leads with a specific observation and genuine value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to find, qualify, and build a list of prospects to reach out to — across B2B SaaS, general B2B, or local small businesses. Also use when the user mentions "prospecting," "build a prospect list," "find prospects," "find leads," "lead gen list," "find SaaS companies that," "find B2B companies," "find local businesses," "ICP-fit accounts," "who should we go after," "outbound list," "target account list," "find clients near me," "businesses without websites," "prospect research," or "qualified leads." Use this for the list-building and qualification phase. For writing the outbound copy after the list is built, see cold-email. For deep competitive research on specific accounts, see competitor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nexscope Ozon product detail query: fetches the complete detail of a single Ozon product by SKU, returning title, price (RUB), rating, review count, QA count, total and daily average sales within the stats window, revenue, stock, category ranking, daily sales trend, brand, seller, fulfillment method (FBO/FBS/OZON), weight, and listing time/days/months. Use for single product deep analysis, competitor product teardown, Ozon product selection assessment, listing diagnosis, sales trend and category ranking tracking. Trigger when the user mentions Ozon product detail, Ozon single product analysis, Ozon SKU query, competitor product data, Ozon sales trend, Ozon category ranking, Ozon stock, Ozon listing time, Nexscope Ozon product search, Ozon product detail, Ozon SKU lookup, single product analysis, competitor product teardown, Ozon sales trend, category rank. Also trigger when the intent is to view detailed data of an Ozon product, even without explicitly mentioning Nexscope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product AI Visibility & Ranking — evaluate how AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek) recommend your product when shoppers ask buying questions. Triggers: AI visibility, product AI ranking, AI recommend, AI search, does AI mention my product.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first marketing audit of a third-party local business (café, roaster, shop, restaurant, hotel, clinic, home service) from a Google Maps, share.google or website link — located DataForSEO rankings, map packs, search volume and seasonality, listings, reviews, backlinks, AI-assistant answers and a site crawl, plus direct checks (real-browser access, page weight, store shipping quotes, email DNS, mobile screenshots) — delivered as an owner-facing report with priced offers, an exact change list and a 12-week plan, optionally localized and bilingual. Use when "audit this business", "full marketing audit of <business>", "prospect audit", "local business audit", "use DataForSEO for the hard SEO data", "go deeper", "rerun it for local <market>", "also in Spanish", "give me the offers, changes and 3 month plan", or a business link arrives with "audit". For auditing your own product across channels use /kai-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。