458 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotates ChIP-seq peaks to genomic features, nearest genes, ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs), and regulatory domains. Uses ChIPseeker (R), HOMER annotatePeaks.pl (CLI), pyranges (Python), GREAT/rGREAT (regulatory domain gene-set enrichment), ChIP-Enrich (locus-length-adjusted), ENCODE SCREEN cCRE classification (PLS/pELS/dELS/CA-CTCF/CA-H3K4me3), and ENCODE-rE2G for cell-type-specific enhancer-gene linking. Handles nearest-TSS vs host-gene ambiguity, promoter window definition, and feature priority. Use when assigning genomic context to peaks, linking enhancer peaks to target genes, classifying peaks against ENCODE cCRE registry, or running gene-set enrichment on peak-associated genes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies super-enhancers from H3K27ac, MED1, or BRD4 ChIP-seq using ROSE, ROSE2, LILY, HOMER -style super, and ENCODE dELS cross-referencing. Handles peak stitching parameters, ranking choices, hockey-stick inflection, marker choice (H3K27ac vs MED1/BRD4), and cross-condition comparison with spike-in normalization. Constructs core regulatory circuitry (Saint-Andre 2016) from SE-encoded TFs. Use when identifying cell-identity / cancer-associated regulatory domains, comparing super-enhancers between conditions, identifying master transcription factor networks, or predicting BET-inhibitor responsiveness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Domain-Driven Design system for software development. Use when designing new systems with DDD principles, refactoring existing codebases toward DDD, generating code scaffolding (entities, aggregates, repositories, domain events), facilitating Event Storming sessions, creating bounded context maps, or performing code reviews with a DDD lens. Covers both strategic design (bounded contexts, subdomains, context maps, ubiquitous language) and tactical design (entities, value objects, aggregates, domain services, repositories). Supports all major architecture patterns (Hexagonal/Ports & Adapters, CQRS, Event Sourcing, Clean Architecture) with language-agnostic guidance and concrete examples in Python and TypeScript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publishes HTML or Markdown as display.dev URLs with public, company, or private access. Supports signup, claiming, sharing, browsing, bounded reads, exact edits, and comment iteration. Use when the user asks to "publish this", "share this", "share with the org", "post this online", "make a private link", "share with [email]", "publish a report", "list my artifacts", "find an artifact", "publish a large file", "publish this generated HTML file", "read this artifact", "search inside this artifact", "change this passage", "make a copy of this artifact", "duplicate version", "create a display.dev account", "claim this publish", "add a company email domain", "transfer an email domain", "change the email domains add-on", "show my referral link", "show referral rewards", "watch comments on this artifact", "respond to comments", or "resolve this comment thread". Use whenever a request contains a display.dev artifact URL (`*.dsp.so/*`). Anonymous publishing returns a 30-day preview and browser claim URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up Traefik as a local reverse proxy — real domains on 127.0.0.1, trusted HTTPS via mkcert, automatic service discovery, and multi-project routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Normalizes company names, industries, domains, locations, and descriptions. Use when the user provides company records and wants consistent canonical fields with confidence and unresolved items flagged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convex is the backend agents get right on the first try: an all-TypeScript reactive platform where the database, server functions, scheduling, file storage, auth, and realtime sync are one type-safe system, every function is a transaction, and `tsc` catches most mistakes before deploy. Ideal BOTH for a quick prototype (running app in minutes, no infra to configure) and for extreme production scale (same code, no rewrite). Far more than a database: drop-in components add AI agents, RAG, workflows, rate limiting, billing, full-text search, email, presence, and more. Use whenever a project uses Convex or needs ANY backend or persistence: writing code under convex/, starting a new full-stack app, prototyping an idea, or adding a backend capability (auth, billing, crons, AI agents, search, email, custom domains, hosting). Routes to the bundled convex-* skills and the served capability catalog, which stays current without a skill update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Point a domain you already own at your Convex app (DNS records, custom-domain attach, auth-origin rebind).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Point a domain you already own at your Convex app (DNS records, custom-domain attach, auth-origin rebind).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convex is the backend agents get right on the first try: an all-TypeScript reactive platform where the database, server functions, scheduling, file storage, auth, and realtime sync are one type-safe system, every function is a transaction, and `tsc` catches most mistakes before deploy. Ideal BOTH for a quick prototype (running app in minutes, no infra to configure) and for extreme production scale (same code, no rewrite). Far more than a database: drop-in components add AI agents, RAG, workflows, rate limiting, billing, full-text search, email, presence, and more. Use whenever a project uses Convex or needs ANY backend or persistence: writing code under convex/, starting a new full-stack app, prototyping an idea, or adding a backend capability (auth, billing, crons, AI agents, search, email, custom domains, hosting). Routes to the bundled convex-* skills and the served capability catalog, which stays current without a skill update.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect DNS-based data exfiltration by analyzing Zeek dns.log for high-entropy subdomains and anomalous query patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects command-and-control (C2) communications tunneled through DNS protocol including DNS tunneling tools (Iodine, dnscat2, dns2tcp, Cobalt Strike DNS beacon), domain generation algorithms (DGA), encoded payload delivery via TXT/CNAME records, and DNS beaconing patterns. Covers Shannon entropy analysis of query subdomains, statistical anomaly detection, ML-based DGA classification, passive DNS correlation, and Zeek/Suricata signature development. Activates for requests involving DNS-based C2 detection, DNS tunnel identification, suspicious DNS traffic investigation, or DGA domain classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an automated pipeline to defang indicators of compromise (URLs, IPs, domains, emails) for safe sharing and distribute them in STIX format through TAXII feeds and threat intelligence platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Queries Certificate Transparency logs via crt.sh and pycrtsh to detect phishing domains, unauthorized certificate issuance, and shadow IT. Monitors newly issued certificates for typosquatting and brand impersonation using Levenshtein distance. Use for proactive phishing domain detection and certificate monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitor Certificate Transparency logs using crt.sh and Certstream to detect phishing domains, lookalike certificates, and unauthorized certificate issuance targeting your organization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA System Safety Handbook Volume 2 (NASA/SP-2014-612). Use for risk-informed safety cases (RISC), integrated safety analysis (ISA), adequate safety concepts, safety objectives and requirements, acquirer/provider roles, graded safety analysis, claims-evidence-argument structure, SSMP development, and RISC evaluation. Does not cover nuclear or chemical safety domains, occupational health regulations, or NASA-specific programmatic requirements beyond system safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Send transactional email and manage domains, contacts, audiences, and broadcasts via the Resend REST API. Use when the user wants to send mail, verify a sending domain, trigger a broadcast, or mutate contacts programmatically — instead of writing SMTP glue, pasting into a UI, or asking them to send the message by hand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
- End-to-end passive reconnaissance for a domain, website or IP — builds an asset inventory covering registration, DNS, subdomains, infrastructure, tech stack, history and ownership without sending a single packet to the target. Use when asked to research or profile a domain or website, map what an organisation runs, or investigate a suspicious site without alerting its operator
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。