「each」の検索結果

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Model-guided autonomous root-cause analysis over a UModel object-graph semantic layer. Use with `umodel-query` when diagnosing service degradation, SLO breach, latency/error spikes, incidents, outages, or questions like why a service is slow, degraded, erroring, or timing out. The skill guides evidence collection across object graph, metrics, logs, topology, runbooks, deployments, config changes, business traffic, and runtime capacity; it is especially useful for ruling out red herrings such as recent but unrelated deployments. Triggers: root cause, RCA, incident, SLO breach, outage, postmortem, latency spike, error spike, timeout, 根因分析, 故障排查, 告警定位, 为什么慢, SLO 击穿.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement and audit privacy controls in product and infrastructure — GDPR, CCPA / CPRA, LGPD, PIPEDA. Covers data minimization, lawful basis, consent management, data subject access requests (DSARs — access, deletion, portability), data processing agreements, DPIA / TIA, breach notification timing, data classification, and the technical implementation of 'right to be forgotten' across backups, caches, analytics, and third parties. Use when the user mentions 'GDPR,' 'CCPA,' 'CPRA,' 'data privacy,' 'privacy engineering,' 'data subject access request,' 'DSAR,' 'right to deletion,' 'right to be forgotten,' 'data portability,' 'consent management,' 'cookie consent,' 'data minimization,' 'DPIA,' 'data protection impact assessment,' 'breach notification,' 'BAA,' 'DPA,' 'data processing agreement,' 'sub-processor,' 'cross-border data transfer,' 'SCCs,' or needs to implement or review privacy controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific CVE or vulnerability disclosure end-to-end — what version is affected, is your code reachable, is there a public PoC, is there a patch, what's the exposure window, what's the mitigation if you can't patch immediately. Use when the user mentions 'CVE,' 'vulnerability research,' 'is this CVE relevant,' 'zero-day,' 'CISA KEV,' 'GitHub Security Advisory,' 'reachability analysis,' 'patch analysis,' 'exploit availability,' 'EPSS,' 'CVSS,' or 'should we drop everything and patch this.'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, scope, and execute an authorized red-team engagement — distinct from a penetration test. Covers engagement methodology, assumed-breach scenarios, ATT&CK emulation plans, rules of engagement, deconfliction with the blue team, post-engagement debriefs, and the program-level work that makes red teams actually improve defenses. Use when the user mentions 'red team,' 'red team engagement,' 'red teaming,' 'adversary emulation,' 'ATT&CK emulation,' 'assumed breach,' 'purple team exercise,' 'tabletop with technical execution,' 'red team scope,' 'rules of engagement,' 'red team RoE,' 'deconfliction,' 'red team debrief,' or wants to design or run a red-team engagement against systems with authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagrams and checkable docs from a codebase. Draws ERDs, C4 context/container/component views, API endpoint catalogues, lifecycle/state machines, and service-to-service call maps as a validated JSON spec plus a standalone HTML viewer, with Mermaid export. Imports OpenAPI, GraphQL SDL and Prisma; otherwise reads the code (NestJS, TypeORM, Express) and writes the spec. Use for: database diagram, ERD, data model, table relationships, C4 or architecture diagram, system context, API map, endpoint list, "show me the endpoints", status flow, state machine, allowed transitions, "what happens after X is approved", how services call each other, microservice map, Mermaid diagram. Also writes documentation as a fact graph: each statement carries its source and a computed confidence, and a drift check fails CI when the code moves. Use to document a system, write architecture or onboarding docs, or explain how a system works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided, hands-on course teaching architects how to use Codex or Claude Code — six short modules, each built around an exercise on a bundled sandbox project (a fictional Brooklyn art museum expansion). Resumable across sessions via PROGRESS.md. Use when the user runs $learn or /as:learn, says they're new to AI-assisted project work, or asks how to learn it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Posts review findings from a JSON file as inline comments on a GitHub Pull Request, attaching each comment to its file and line. Use when you have a list/JSON of review findings (each with a file path, line number, and a message such as summary/failure_scenario) and want them published on a PR as inline review comments. Triggers include "post these review comments on the PR", "associate comments to files in the PR", "publish review findings to PR

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a founder needs to write cold emails or LinkedIn messages to prospects, partners, or investors. Activate when the user mentions cold email, outbound, prospecting, LinkedIn outreach, or needs help getting replies from people who don't know them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs to write recruiting outreach messages to attract passive candidates or request referrals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional email templates for various business scenarios including sales outreach, customer support, internal communications, follow-ups, and apologies. Creates personalized, tone-appropriate templates with subject lines and formatting. Use when users need to write business emails, cold outreach, or professional communications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or update an Agent Skill that teaches consumers one npm or local package the user maintains, including framework modules and wrappers. Tests each example against the installed version. Use when a maintainer asks for a package Skill, a SKILL.md for their library, or a Skill update after a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register this agent and terminal with Reach for cards, calls and wake-ups. Use when asked to join, connect, or become reachable, or when a manually opened agent lacks `SNO_EXECUTOR_ADDR`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build privacy KPI dashboards tracking DSAR volume and response time, breach count and severity, DPIA completion rate, training coverage, and consent rates. Includes metric definitions, data collection patterns, visualization designs, and executive reporting templates for privacy program measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional email templates for various business scenarios including sales outreach, customer support, internal communications, follow-ups, and apologies. Creates personalized, tone-appropriate templates with subject lines and formatting. Use when users need to write business emails, cold outreach, or professional communications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and analyze unused or redundant code including unused functions/methods, unused variables/imports, unreachable code, and redundant conditions. Use when cleaning up codebases, improving maintainability, reducing technical debt, or conducting code quality audits. Analyzes Python code using AST analysis and produces markdown reports listing dead code locations with line numbers, severity ratings, and recommendations. Triggers when users ask to find dead code, remove unused code, identify unused imports, find unreachable code, or clean up redundant logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate targeted test inputs to reach specific code paths and hard-to-reach behaviors in Python code. Use when: (1) Targeting uncovered branches or specific execution paths, (2) Need coverage-guided test generation, (3) Want to leverage LLM understanding of code semantics for meaningful test inputs, (4) Testing boundary conditions and edge cases systematically, (5) Combining symbolic reasoning with fuzzing. Provides path analysis, constraint solving, coverage-guided strategies, and LLM-driven semantic generation for comprehensive test input creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate prioritized CVE watchlists and actionable security recommendations for repositories. Use when analyzing CVE scan results, creating security reports, prioritizing vulnerability remediation, or generating security gate reports for CI/CD. Takes CVE scan results (JSON/SARIF from npm audit, pip-audit, Snyk), reachability analysis, and cutoff date as input. Combines severity, reachability, exploitability, and dependency criticality to rank CVEs by practical risk. Outputs markdown reports with concrete next-step guidance (immediate upgrade, monitor, ignore with justification, apply mitigation) suitable for issue trackers, security reviews, and CI security gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for test lifecycle hooks: beforeAll, afterAll, beforeEach, afterEach, fixtures, preload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。