3,692 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debugging workflows for Python (pdb, debugpy), Go (delve), Rust (lldb), and Node.js, including container debugging (kubectl debug, ephemeral containers) and production-safe debugging techniques with distributed tracing and correlation IDs. Use when setting breakpoints, debugging containers/pods, remote debugging, or production debugging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate technical security work into the language of non-security audiences — board, executives, engineering, customer success, customers, legal, procurement, sales. Covers incident communication, post-mortem narrative, audit-findings-for-stakeholders, risk justification, security spend justification, and customer-facing breach disclosure. Use when the user mentions 'security comms,' 'communicate this finding,' 'explain to my boss,' 'board update,' 'executive summary,' 'incident communication,' 'breach notification,' 'customer disclosure,' 'security memo,' 'post-mortem narrative,' 'risk justification,' 'why this matters to the business,' 'translate this finding,' 'stakeholder update,' or has technical security work that needs to land with a non-security audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user needs a technical SEO audit, on-page optimization guidance, or help resolving crawlability, indexation, or performance issues that affect search rankings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes and restructures technical documentation - READMEs, tutorials, how-to guides, user guides, architecture docs, onboarding guides, runbooks and SOPs, troubleshooting guides, release notes, and knowledge base articles - grounded in the actual code or product, with commands and examples verified where possible. Use when the user asks to document a project, feature, system, or process, write or fix a README, explain a codebase to new developers, turn notes into a guide, or make existing docs clearer. For endpoint-by-endpoint API reference or OpenAPI specs, use api-documentation-writer; for CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md files, use claude-md-writer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs multi-source research across GitHub, HN, Reddit, arXiv, and Semantic Scholar. Use when surveying a technical topic across multiple channels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scans HN, Lobsters, Reddit, and tech blogs for community experience reports. Use when gathering practitioner opinions on a technology or approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans, drafts, and refines technical tutorials for developers. Use when writing step-by-step guides or getting-started walkthroughs backed by working code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies an ASD-STE100-derived register to operator and procedural text. Use when writing runbooks or steps. Do not use for docstrings, ADRs, or rationale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast PARALLEL wiki lookup engine over wiki/techniques + wiki/payloads + wiki/tools + wiki/cheatsheets for a surface/service/vuln-class. Two modes - quick (one qmd search, cheap, fire constantly) and deep (4 parallel subagents, one per area, merged ready-to-use arsenal card, cached). This is the fast path arsenal that `arsenal` delegates to; the hunt-* skills each inline their own qmd_query and can hand off here for a parallel lookup. Use for "what do I use against <surface>", "arsenal for <X>", "deep/full arsenal", "tool + payload + technique + cheatsheet for <X>", "fast wiki lookup", "parallel wiki search", any "how do I attack/exploit <service|vuln-class>" where you want the documented tooling + payloads before hand-rolling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wiki-first "what do I use" lookup - pick the automated TOOL (wiki/tools/), then the PAYLOAD/technique (wiki/payloads/ + wiki/cheatsheets/), for a surface/service/vuln-class BEFORE hand-rolling or working from memory. Use for "tool for <service>", "automated tools for web/<service>", "what should I run on <surface>", "which tool for <X>", "payloads for <X>", "payload arsenal", "cheatsheet for <X>", "how do I exploit <tech/class>", "exploit/attack chain for <X>", "arsenal", any SSRF/XSS/SQLi/SSTI/LFI/JWT/XXE/IDOR/NoSQL/deserialization/CSRF/CORS/CRLF/GraphQL/smuggling/web-cache/OAuth/SAML/MFA/crypto/LDAP/XPath/WebAuthn/file-upload/IMDS/prompt-injection/Modbus ask, plus "privesc arsenal", "CVE arsenal", "default creds", "nuclei templates", "sqlmap/hydra/nmap/bloodhound", "password attacks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provide comprehensive techniques for penetration testing AWS cloud environments. Covers IAM enumeration, privilege escalation, SSRF to metadata endpoint, S3 bucket exploitation, Lambda code extraction, and persistence techniques for red team operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AUTHORIZED USE ONLY: This skill contains dual-use security techniques. Before proceeding with any bypass or analysis: > 1.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive PET selection guide covering differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, federated learning, zero-knowledge proofs, and trusted execution environments. Includes use-case matching matrix, performance comparison, and GDPR alignment assessment for each technology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides privacy audit evidence collection processes including evidence planning, sampling strategies, documentation standards, chain of custody, interview techniques, system walkthrough procedures, and evidence evaluation. Covers ISO 19011 evidence categories (records, statements of fact, observations) and ISACA audit evidence requirements for privacy compliance assessments. Keywords: audit evidence, evidence collection, sampling, chain of custody, audit documentation, interview techniques.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preparing EU AI Act compliance documentation for high-risk AI systems. Covers Annex III classification, technical documentation under Art. 11, conformity assessment, risk management systems, and CE marking requirements. Keywords: EU AI Act, high-risk AI, Annex III, conformity assessment, CE marking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evidence-driven architecture research for understanding real systems and making technical decisions. Use when doing architecture landscape studies, source-backed system archaeology, build-vs-buy or adopt/adapt/build decisions, open-source and commercial comparisons, revisiting an earlier architecture choice, or handling requests such as 架构调研, 架构选型, 竞品架构, 技术尽调, 同类方案, 开源替代, how is X built, and what should we learn from X. Do not use for small mechanical changes, market-only discovery, or detailed design after the technology direction is already fixed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when analyzing weekly price charts for stocks, stock indices, cryptocurrencies, or forex pairs. Use this skill when the user provides chart images and requests technical analysis, trend identification, support/resistance levels, scenario planning, or probability assessments based purely on chart data without consideration of news or fundamental factors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive market environment analysis and reporting tool. Analyzes global markets including US, European, Asian markets, forex, commodities, and economic indicators. Provides risk-on/risk-off assessment, sector analysis, and technical indicator interpretation. Triggers on keywords like market analysis, market environment, global markets, trading environment, market conditions, investment climate, market sentiment, forex analysis, stock market analysis, 相場環境, 市場分析, マーケット状況, 投資環境.