「infrastructure」の検索結果

Review and create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and design system compliance. Evaluates using three pillars: frictionless insight-to-action, quality craft, and trustworthy building. USE FOR: PR reviews, design reviews, accessibility audits, design system compliance checks, creative frontend design, UI code review, component reviews, responsive design checks, theme testing, and creating memorable UI. DO NOT USE FOR: Backend API reviews, database schema reviews, infrastructure or DevOps work, pure business logic without UI, or non-frontend code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Robert C. Martin-inspired architecture rules when separating business policy from frameworks, databases, UI, or infrastructure details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate workloads from Microsoft Azure to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Azure, Azure to AWS, move off Azure, migrate AKS to EKS, migrate App Service or Azure VMs to AWS compute, migrate Azure SQL or Azure Database to RDS, migrate Cosmos DB to DynamoDB, migrate Azure OpenAI to Bedrock, move Azure AI or agentic workloads to AWS, estimate AWS costs for my Azure infrastructure, what-if workshop. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Azure resources from Terraform, the live `az` CLI, app code, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, optionally reprice scenarios, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify gates Design, Estimate, and Generate; Generate is opt-in at the post-Estimate decision gate. Bicep/ARM discovery is not yet implemented; a Bicep/ARM-only workspace halts. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Heroku migrations (see heroku-to-aws), general AWS architecture advice (see architect-for-startups), AWS-to-Azure reverse migration, or Azure-to-Azure refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and automates custom image builds with EC2 Image Builder - Linux, Windows, and macOS AMIs, and container images to ECR. Covers the build IAM role, Amazon-managed and custom components, image recipes, infrastructure and distribution configuration (launch templates, SSM parameters, other Regions), one-off builds, recurring scheduled pipelines for golden AMI automation and OS patching, custom image workflows, and diagnosing failed builds. Applies when creating, automating, or scheduling AMI or container image builds with Image Builder, or when debugging a failed build. Not for launching instances from existing AMIs, AMI lifecycle/retirement, or general EC2 fleet management.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a production-ready VPC with public and private subnets across multiple Availability Zones, including internet gateway, NAT gateways, route tables, and security groups following AWS Well-Architected principles. Use when deploying multi-AZ VPC infrastructure with automatic CIDR planning and DNS resolution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enables internet access for AWS Lambda functions deployed in VPC subnets by creating NAT Gateway infrastructure, configuring public/private subnet routing, and updating security groups. Use when a VPC-attached Lambda function cannot reach the internet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates vibe-coded web applications to AWS. Handles the full workflow from analysis through migration to deployment, producing deployable AWS Blocks infrastructure code. Supports full-stack apps built with vibe-coding platforms (Lovable, Bolt.new, Replit) and frontend web applications and websites: React, Vue, Angular, Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, SvelteKit, Gatsby, Vite, Svelte, Solid, Docusaurus, and others (static sites, SPAs, and SSR frameworks with static export). Triggers on: launch with AWS, launch on AWS, deploy to AWS, migrate to AWS, host my app on AWS, move my app to AWS, transfer my app to AWS. Activates when the user wants to migrate a vibe-coded app or frontend web app to AWS, even if they don't say 'migrate' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides authoritative compatibility checks, pricing estimates, connection troubleshooting, pre-warming guidance, and infrastructure mutations for Amazon Keyspaces (for Apache Cassandra). Covers LWT/batch operations, secondary indexes, materialized views, capacity modes, TTL, PITR, CDC, auto-scaling, multi-region keyspaces, UDTs, nodetool diagnostics parsing, SQL-to-Cassandra migration, and Cassandra-to-Keyspaces migration scenarios. Agents frequently produce incomplete or incorrect answers about Keyspaces feature support without this skill loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects, deploys, and customizes AI models on Amazon SageMaker. Training or Processing jobs, fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RLVR/RLAIF), model selection, dataset preparation, evaluation, SageMaker or Bedrock deployment, inference optimization and endpoint diagnostics. Covers the full lifecycle from planning through production. Use when fine-tuning models on SageMaker, choosing which base model to customize, fine-tune, or deploy from SageMaker JumpStart or Hub, SageMakerPublicHub, or the SageMaker public model catalog, transforming or validating training data, evaluating model quality, deploying or optimizing endpoints, configuring IAM/S3 for training, or managing SageMaker Managed MLflow. Use for endpoint health, failures, latency, logs, metrics, errors. Covers Serverless Model Customization, Nova and OSS deployment paths, and PySDK v3. NOT for Ground Truth labeling, Feature Store, or general-purpose AWS infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides building full-stack applications with AWS Blocks — an Infrastructure-from-Code framework. Applies when creating APIs, selecting Building Blocks (KVStore, DistributedTable, Database, AuthBasic, AuthCognito, Realtime, AsyncJob, FileBucket, etc.), running local development, or deploying AWS Blocks applications. Also covers AWS Blocks topics with validated, version-specific patterns that prevent common mistakes. Triggers when user mentions AWS Blocks; project has aws-blocks/ directory; code imports @aws-blocks packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authors, deploys, and troubleshoots AWS infrastructure using CDK with TypeScript or Python. Covers best practices, stack architecture, and construct patterns. Applies when writing CDK constructs, bootstrapping environments, running cdk deploy/synth/diff, fixing CDK or CloudFormation errors, planning stack structure, importing existing resources, resolving drift, or refactoring stacks without resource replacement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps migrate self-managed Apache Kafka workloads to Amazon MSK Express. Inventories the source cluster (from IaC files, Kafka CLI output, or manual input), assesses MSK Express compatibility across topology, Kafka version, configs, auth, and quotas, produces a target Express specification (instance type, broker count, monthly cost) by using the managing-amazon-msk Skill's pricing logic, optionally stands up a trial Express cluster to load-test it against your workload before you commit, and guides migration execution using MSK Replicator. Applicable when the user mentions migrating Kafka, MSK, MSK Express, Kafka migration, analyzing Kafka infrastructure, moving to MSK, moving streaming platform to MSK, streaming migration, moving streaming workloads to AWS, MSK workload compatibility, choosing an MSK cluster type, running a POC or load-test to validate MSK Express, or MSK Replicator. Prefer this skill to the managing-amazon-msk skill for migration questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy AssemblyAI workers, Streaming v3 token services, and authenticated callback receivers with reversible controls. Use when shipping cloud infrastructure. Trigger with "deploy AssemblyAI" or "AssemblyAI webhook deployment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy AppFolio integration service to cloud infrastructure. Trigger: "deploy appfolio".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-grade architecture patterns for Apify-powered applications. Use when designing scraping infrastructure, building multi-Actor pipelines, or integrating Apify into a larger system architecture. Trigger with "apify architecture", "apify best practices", "apify project structure", "scraping architecture", "apify system design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and control a staged Abridge rollout across clinical cohorts and EHR workflows without pretending to deploy vendor infrastructure. Use when preparing an Abridge pilot or expansion. Trigger with "plan the Abridge rollout".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy and orchestrate Vertex AI ADK agents using A2A protocol. Manages AgentCard discovery, task submission, Code Execution Sandbox, and Memory Bank. Use when asked to "deploy ADK agent" or "orchestrate agents". Trigger with phrases like 'deploy', 'infrastructure', or 'CI/CD'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one-shot external recon into a continuous monitoring program. Covers the scheduled re-scan-and-diff loop (baseline snapshot -> interval sleep -> re-scan -> asset/finding delta -> threshold-gated webhook alert), the scan-to-scan diff engine (new/removed/changed assets by a tracked-attribute table, new/resolved findings by a stable cross-scan fingerprint), adversary CTI / chatter monitoring across six public feeds (ransomwatch, ransomware.live, HackerNews Algolia search, Reddit security-subreddit RSS, GitHub Gist code-search, public Telegram channel scraping) with a source-kind-aware severity engine (leak-site/forum/telegram/paste tiers, CRITICAL through INFO), literal/glob/regex watchlist pattern matching, full-corpus capture with retroactive rescan on new watchlist entries, infrastructure-tracking-over-time discipline (certificate-transparency, passive-DNS, port/service, and typosquat re-enumeration cadence, and what a genuine 'perimeter drift' event looks like in the diff output), a five-state finding-lifecycle state machine (open/triaged/risk_accepted/resolved/false_positive) with per-severity SLA and fingerprint-based cross-scan dedup and auto-resolve/reopen rules, the alert-fatigue trap where a lifecycle-unaware rule re-fires on an already-accepted finding, a durable retry/backoff alert-outbox pattern ('queued is not delivered'), and copy-paste bash-cron plus PowerShell-Scheduled-Task recipes for a re-scan+diff loop with the Slack-compatible webhook payload shape. Passive OSINT and analysis only -- no new active-intrusion technique. Use when setting up ongoing monitoring for a retainer or MSSP engagement, tuning alert thresholds to avoid fatigue, triaging a finding's lifecycle status, investigating adversary chatter about a brand, building a 'what changed on the perimeter since last week' report, or deciding whether a persisting finding should re-alert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 6-stage recon pipeline (seed → asset expansion → enrichment → exposure analysis → convergence → operator-armed active validation) with connector-resilience and stage-vs-gating discipline, asset-graph discipline, severity rubric, confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, identity-fabric mapping, breach×identity correlation with per-person identity dossiers, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing, WAF/CDN bypass, vulnerability prioritization, phishing infrastructure planning, bug bounty submission, and client deliverable templates. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, or producing client deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Org-grade attack-surface mapping: given a company's legal identity, discover its ENTIRE owned internet footprint — corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets — with attribution discipline, not just DNS breadth. The org-first attribution pyramid (legal entity -> LEI/registration -> corporate family -> owned domains -> owned netblocks/ASN -> live assets). Corporate-identity resolution via the GLEIF LEI API (legal name -> LEI, exact-LEI direct-children expansion, downward-only depth-capped BFS, NEVER a name re-resolution), SEC-EDGAR full-text search + Exhibit-21 subsidiary entity names, OpenCorporates entity corroboration, Wikidata SPARQL corporate graph (P856/P355/P749/P1830). Domain attribution via reverse-WHOIS (WhoisXML preview-then-purchase quota guard, SecurityTrails associated-domains — both paid), crt.sh O= certificate-transparency organization pivot (keyless), infrastructure correlation (shared NS/MX/SaaS-TXT, netblock membership, reverse-DNS PTR), and the independent-evidence combiner (1-prod(1-w_i), rule of three, OwnerTier NONE/WEAK/MODERATE/STRONG/CONFIRMED) — discover-only `related:` candidates are NEVER auto-scanned. Netblock/ASN attribution via org-first RIR queries (ARIN Whois-RWS org-handle search, RIPE DB organisation + inverse-org search) that recover 'dark netblocks' with no DNS link to the seed, ASN discovery (RIPEstat + BGPView union), the HYPERSCALER-SCOPE GUARD (never attribute a whole AWS/GCP/Azure/Cloudflare announced range to a tenant — keep only the seed-containing block, tag shared_hosting_cdn), and org-identity-seeded internet-scan-index queries (Shodan/Censys/ZoomEye/FOFA/BinaryEdge org: filters + an always-on keyless crt.sh fallback). Promote-to-scan triage ranks forgotten discover-only netblocks by remote-access exposure (gateway-vendor/KEV/control-plane/datastore port scoring) into an operator queue. Attribution confidence rubric + anti-patterns (namesake grafting via GLEIF name re-resolution, single-signal ownership, hyperscaler over-attribution, privacy-WHOIS pivot poisoning, RIR org-name collisions). Passive/keyless-first OSINT only — every paid-key dependency is enrichment on top of a keyless core, never a hard requirement. Use when mapping an organization's full corporate-family internet footprint, resolving a legal entity to its LEI/subsidiaries, discovering domains/netblocks/ASNs an org owns beyond its one seed domain, auditing M&A/shadow-IT sprawl, or scoping an engagement that starts from a company NAME rather than a domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS cloud patterns for Lambda, ECS, S3, DynamoDB, and Infrastructure as Code with CDK/Terraform

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design scalable distributed systems using structured approaches for load balancing, caching, database scaling, and message queues. Use when the user mentions "system design", "scale this", "high availability", "rate limiter", "design a URL shortener", "design Twitter", "design Uber", "design a news feed", "system design interview", "capacity planning", or "distributed architecture". Also trigger when estimating infrastructure requirements, choosing between microservices and monoliths, or designing for millions of concurrent users. Covers common system designs (TinyURL, feeds, chat) and back-of-the-envelope estimation. For data fundamentals, see ddia-systems. For resilience, see release-it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure software around the Dependency Rule: source code dependencies point inward from frameworks to use cases to entities. Use when the user mentions "architecture layers", "dependency rule", "ports and adapters (hexagonal)", "onion architecture", "screaming architecture", "where should business logic go", "decouple from the database", "swap the framework without a rewrite", or "keep business rules independent". Also trigger when deciding which layer code belongs in, isolating core logic from infrastructure, defining module boundaries, or debating whether the framework should call your code or the reverse. Covers component principles, boundaries, and SOLID. For code-level quality, see clean-code. For domain modeling, see domain-driven-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。