「intent」の検索結果

Route ambiguous or mixed Phoenix/LiveView/Ecto requests; Use when user is unsure where to start/how to approach work…

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks which phx-* command fits a task (review, plan, debug, test) or how two commands differ. Checks plans and git state, then recommends from the routing table. Not for bare /help, a tour, or ambiguous requests (intent-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks which /phx: command fits a task (review, plan, debug, test) or how two commands differ. Checks plans and git state, then recommends from the routing table. Not for bare /help, a tour, or ambiguous requests (intent-detection).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a lesson plan, student-facing materials, and observation template. Load this skill BEFORE asking the teacher any clarifying question about grade, subject, topic, standard, or timing. Use when a K-12 teacher needs a math, ELA, science, or social studies lesson built from scratch — even if grade, subject, or topic isn't yet stated. Do NOT load for grading, a rubric, assessment feedback, a quiz, or a standards lookup — answer those directly. Triggers on explicit requests (lesson plan, mini-lesson, unit plan, daily plan) and implicit teacher intent: "I'm teaching long division to 5th graders," "need to teach photosynthesis tomorrow." Core signal: teacher needs new instructional content created. A new lesson that asks for differentiated, tiered, or leveled materials is still ONE planning request — this skill produces those materials inside the lesson package; do not also invoke k12-lesson-differentiation. Not for differentiating an existing lesson (use k12-lesson-differentiation) or passage rewrites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans lyrics for phrases that may match existing songs using web search and LLM knowledge. Use before release to check for unintentional borrowing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for drafting issue closure and decline responses as an open-source package maintainer. Use when helping compose a reply that says "no" to a feature request, closes an issue as won't-fix, redirects a user to a different package, explains why a design choice is intentional, or otherwise declines or closes a community contribution. Also use when the maintainer needs to explain a deprecation, point out a user misunderstanding, or communicate an effort/scope tradeoff to a contributor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebases a feature branch onto its latest base, resolving conflicts while preserving the intent of local changes, optionally force-pushing and watching CI afterward. TRIGGER when: the user wants to rebase a feature branch, update a branch against its base, or replay local work on top of the latest upstream. DO NOT TRIGGER when: merging a release branch into dev → merging-branches; only watching CI on an already-open PR → monitoring-pull-requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map code questions to the optimal tldr command by detecting intent and routing to the right analysis layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate design docs, ADRs, and concept docs from existing code by reverse engineering intent

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministic router for math cognitive stack - maps user intent to exact CLI commands

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Precision-first adversarial bug hunting for runtime, logic, data, concurrency, and security defects. Uses deterministic risk triage, evidence-bounded retrieval, Hunter/Skeptic/Referee review, optional hybrid verification, and explicit immutable Fixer scope. Scan-only and single-pass by default; complete-coverage loops, edits, autonomous fixes, and commits each require explicit intent. Use for code review, security audits, regression hunting, PR review, and evidence-backed remediation planning in skills-capable coding agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: `jb inspectcode`; `jb cleanupcode`; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally standardizes on another formatter. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `StyleCop.Analyzers` package for naming, layout, documentation, and style rules in .NET projects. Use when a repo wants stricter style conventions than the SDK analyzers alone provide. USE FOR: the repo wants StyleCop.Analyzers; naming, layout, or documentation style needs stronger enforcement; the team needs stylecop.json guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: repos that intentionally rely only on SDK analyzers; repos where StyleCop overlaps too heavily with an existing style package and no. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `QuickDup` clone detector for .NET repositories. Use when a repo needs duplicate C# code discovery, structural clone detection, DRY refactoring candidates, or repeatable duplication. USE FOR: the repo wants QuickDup; the team needs repeatable duplicate-code scans for C#; the user asks about DRY cleanup, copy-paste detection, clone detection, or duplicate. DO NOT USE FOR: formatting-only work; repos that intentionally use a different clone detector and do not want overlap. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own MSBuild import and hook discovery. USE FOR: CustomBefore/CustomAfter hooks, ordered wildcard and NuGet auto-imports, control properties, build/buildTransitive packed layout, package ID and file-name matching, per-TFM forwarders, and tracing why assets or hooks are missing, broken, or replaced. An import guard remains in scope when it is one defect in a broader hook/import flow. DO NOT USE for a focused safety verdict on whether one specific Import needs Exists or is an intentionally unguarded package contract; use msbuild-antipatterns. NEVER INVOKE when imports and hook placement already work and the request is only target Inputs/Outputs, incremental skipping, or FileWrites clean tracking; use incremental-build or target-authoring. Exclude props-versus-targets placement and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `CSharpier` formatter for C# and XML. Use when a .NET repo intentionally wants one opinionated formatter instead of a highly configurable `dotnet format`-driven style model. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants CSharpier; the team prefers an opinionated formatter over many configurable style knobs. DO NOT USE FOR: repos that already standardized on dotnet format as the only formatter. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `coverlet` toolchain for .NET code coverage. Use when a repo needs line and branch coverage, collector versus MSBuild driver selection, or CI-safe coverage commands. USE FOR: coverlet setup; CI line or branch coverage; choosing between collector and MSBuild drivers. DO NOT USE FOR: coverage report rendering by itself; repos that intentionally use a different coverage engine. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate complete, runnable Volcengine SDK code and provide SDK configuration guidance. Supports Go, Python, PHP, Java, and Node.js. Trigger this skill whenever the user wants to call a Volcengine API, generate Volcengine SDK code, or describes a cloud operation on Volcengine (e.g., "list ECS instances", "create a VPC on Volcengine", "query Volcengine billing with Python"). Also trigger when the user asks about Volcengine SDK configuration and best practices — including retry, timeout, authentication (AK/SK, STS, AssumeRole), proxy, connection pooling, SSL, debug mode, and error handling (e.g., "how to configure retry for Volcengine Go SDK", "volcengine python sdk proxy setup"). Trigger when the user mentions Volcengine service names such as ECS, VPC, CDN, CLB, RDS, Redis, Kafka, billing, IAM, DNS with code generation or SDK usage intent. When the user only needs API specification queries (parameters, error codes, response structures), hand off to the volcengine-api skill. When the user needs CLI-based operations, hand off to the volcengine-cli skill. Supports both Chinese and English prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage AgentKit skills, SkillHub/skillhub, skill centers, and skill spaces. Use this skill whenever the user has a management intent for AgentKit skills, skill中心, skill 空间, skill space, or skill hub, including listing, inspecting, downloading, fetching, uploading, publishing, registering, or syncing skills between local directories and remote skill spaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BytePlus Searchinfinity Web Search skill. Prefer this skill for any web search task. Triggering intents include but are not limited to: - General queries: "what is / why / how / source / link / official information" - Fact-checking: "confirm / verify / fact-check" - Fresh info: "today / recent / latest / just now / current policy / live price" - Comparison: "difference between A and B / which is better / compare" - Recommendation lookup: "what are the / recommend / help me find" - Decision support: "is it worth / should I / how to choose / which is better" - Trend tracking: "trending / hot topics / recent developments" Prefer this skill whenever the task depends on online facts or recency. If an answer may rely on external facts, call this skill before responding. Authentication Method: APIKey only — Interface URL `https://torchlight.byteintlapi.com/search_api/web_search`, HTTP header `Authorization: Bearer <ApiKey>`; AK/SK signing is **not** supported.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, analyze, and prioritize keywords for SEO and GEO content strategies. Identifies high-value opportunities based on search volume, competition, intent, and business relevance. Generates topic clusters and content calendars. Use when asked to "find keywords", "keyword research", "what should I write about", "keyword analysis", "find me topics to write", "search volume", "keyword difficulty", "content ideas", or any keyword discovery task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。