1,819 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Considers adapting the basal insulin rate at hospital admission for patients using insulin pump therapy. Triggered by clinician questions such as "Should we adjust the basal rate upon admission for pump therapy?" or when evaluating pump continuation versus transition to scheduled subcutaneous insulin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Atlassian Administrator for managing and organizing Atlassian products (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, Trello), users, permissions, security, integrations, system configuration, and org-wide governance. Use when asked to add users to Jira, change Confluence permissions, configure access control, update admin settings, manage Atlassian groups, set up SSO, install marketplace apps, review security policies, or handle any org-wide Atlassian administration task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level spacecraft design covering mission analysis, subsystem design, power and thermal management, attitude control, communications, and systems engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level machine design covering shafts, bearings, gears, fasteners, springs, clutches, brakes, and mechanical power transmission systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level applied electromagnetics covering transmission lines, waveguides, antennas, microwave circuits, EMC, and computational EM methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level planetary science covering solar system formation, planetary interiors, atmospheres, surface processes, astrobiology, and planetary exploration missions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level air quality engineering covering pollutant sources, atmospheric dispersion, air quality standards, emission controls, and air quality modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Atlassian Administrator for managing and organizing Atlassian products (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket, Trello), users, permissions, security, integrations, system configuration, and org-wide governance. Use when asked to add users to Jira, change Confluence permissions, configure access control, up...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate strategic-consultant-grade meeting minutes from transcripts or notes in Japanese OR English (matching the source language), then run a self-review loop (max 3 iterations) that checks for internal contradictions, action-item omissions, speaker-name errors, and date/day-of-week mistakes before reporting completion. Use this skill whenever the user asks to draft meeting minutes, summarize a transcript, or document a meeting discussion — including Japanese-language transcripts (議事録 / 会議メモ / 文字起こし) and English-language transcripts.
Record the statements a journal requires and a reader checks — authors with their CRediT contributions, ethics approval that names the body and the reference number, how consent was taken, funding with grant numbers, conflicts of interest, data availability with an address or a reason, and the use of generative AI — as a validated record that the submission folder prints and the manuscript never carries. Use when a run is heading for submission, when an author asks who should be listed, when consent, approval or data sharing has to be stated, or when the venue's AI policy comes up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review framework vs host ownership for permissions, approvals, grants, native execution, storage, daemons, and Clawix integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8719.14C (Process for Limiting Orbital Debris). Use for orbital-debris assessment planning, mission-related debris limits, explosion/passivation and collision risk, postmission disposal options, reentry casualty risk, and ODAR/EOMP governance. Covers STD-8719.14C (Approved 2021-11-05) synthesized notes only; does not replace NPR 8715.6 delivery timing, NASA-HDBK-8719.14 environment/modeling depth, or program-specific OSMA waivers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the NASA Fault Management Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1002, Draft 2, April 2012). Use for the systems-engineering discipline of designing what a system does when it fails — the fault/failure/anomaly vocabulary, the five FM strategies (two prevention strategies — design-time fault avoidance and operational failure avoidance — plus three tolerance strategies — failure masking, failure recovery, and goal change), the six FM process activities across NASA mission phases Pre-A to E, response-latency-versus-time-to-criticality (TTC) design trades, fault/failure containment regions and FEPPs, the four redundancy approaches, top-down FM requirements development, FM verification vs. validation, the seven dedicated FM milestone reviews (FMCR/FMARR/FMPDR/FMCDR/FMTRR/FMLRR/FMCERR), FM organizational structure, and mined NASA Lessons Learned. Space-mission oriented (flight/ground/operations); spacecraft examples throughout. IMPORTANT: built from an UNAPPROVED DRAFT — several sections (detailed architecture building blocks, the Assessment & Analysis guidance, and Operations & Maintenance) are placeholders in the source and are thin here. Thin on detailed FDIR algorithms, terrestrial/IT fault management, and any approved-standard terminology that may have changed since Draft 2.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews the instructions text and skills of a declarative agent, with its stated capabilities, knowledge sources and audience, for prompt-injection exposure, data-leakage paths, over-broad permissions and missing refusals, and returns an attack-surface map, a findings table with severity, quoted evidence and attack path, one pasteable fix per finding, a probe pack the owner can run and a refusal-coverage table. Use when the user asks to "red-team this agent", "check these instructions for prompt injection", "could this agent leak data", "review the permissions on my agent" or "what should this agent refuse". Do not use for checking a SKILL.md against the format rules, use skill-file-reviewer instead; do not use for designing the launch test set, use agent-evaluation-plan instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
非対話セッション（claude-code の remote-control / CI など TTY が無く SSH 鍵パスフレーズを入力できない状況）で git fetch / pull を通すスキル。remote が SSH URL で `ssh -o BatchMode=yes` による非対話 SSH 認証が実際に通る（agent の鍵・パスフレーズ無しのディスク鍵・macOS キーチェーン鍵のいずれでも可）なら素の SSH fetch を実行し、非対話 SSH 認証が通らず `git fetch`/`git pull` が `Permission denied (publickey)` で失敗する場合は、取り込みを HTTPS + gh トークン（credential.helper='!gh auth git-credential'）経由へ自動フォールバックして標準入力なしで実行する。「fetch して」「pull して」「リモートの変更を取り込んで」「最新を取ってきて」と頼まれたが SSH 認証が使えない、fetch/pull が publickey で弾かれた、remote-control からリモートの更新を取り込みたい、といった場面で使う。gh-push の取り込み（incoming）版。`/gh-fetch` で明示起動も可。GitHub(gh) 前提。
非対話セッション（claude-code の remote-control / CI など TTY が無く SSH 鍵パスフレーズを入力できない状況）で git push を通すスキル。remote が SSH URL で `ssh -o BatchMode=yes` による非対話 SSH 認証が実際に通る（agent の鍵・パスフレーズ無しのディスク鍵・macOS キーチェーン鍵のいずれでも可）なら素の SSH push を実行し、非対話 SSH 認証が通らず `git push` が `Permission denied (publickey)` で失敗する場合は、push を HTTPS + gh トークン（credential.helper='!gh auth git-credential'）経由へ自動フォールバックして標準入力なしで実行する。「push して」「リモートに反映して」と頼まれたが SSH 認証が使えない、push が publickey で弾かれた、remote-control から push したい、といった場面で使う。`/gh-push` で明示起動も可。GitHub(gh) 前提。
Scaffolds and reviews custom WordPress REST API endpoints registered via register_rest_route on rest_api_init — namespace and version slug, permission_callback authorization (NEVER __return_true on state-changing routes, which is the most common plugin-side vulnerability on wp.org), args schema with validate_callback / sanitize_callback / type / enum, object-level capability checks via current_user_can with object ID, responses with WP_REST_Response and WP_Error carrying an HTTP status, no raw DB rows / sensitive columns in responses, cookie auth via X-WP-Nonce, REST vs admin-ajax decision. Recommends the better-route library when the plugin grows past a few endpoints. Use when scaffolding or reviewing a REST endpoint, or migrating from admin-ajax. Triggers on register_rest_route, rest_api_init, permission_callback, WP_REST_Request, WP_REST_Response, WP_Error, X-WP-Nonce, rest_ensure_response, register_rest_field, or any file path containing /rest/ or /api/ in a WP plugin or theme.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build a win-back campaign", "re-engage lapsed subscribers", "run a re-permission / re-consent sweep", or "sunset my dead list"; produces a closed-loop reactivation program — a lapsed-cohort definition, a staged offer ladder, a re-consent (re-permission) capture step, and a sunset-confirm / suppression rule. Owns none of the SEND-N sub-item notes: engagement-decay / sunset is email-sequence-designer's and preference-center / frequency options is preference-frequency-manager's — this skill references those notes, it does not re-emit them. Not for the general lifecycle flows (welcome/cart/post-purchase) — use email-sequence-designer; not for the preference-center / opt-down ladder — use preference-frequency-manager; not for the consent record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing EQS or the N1 veto — use email-quality-auditor. 流失召回/重新授权/沉默用户清理
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "watch my list health over time", "flag decaying / unengaged subscribers on a schedule", "why is my open rate drifting down / bounces creeping up", or "build me a re-permission and prune worklist"; runs the scheduled SEND list-decay + suppression-drift watch — an engagement-recency cohort read (30/90/180/365-day), hard-bounce and spam-complaint trend vs benchmark, suppression-list growth/leakage check, and a segmented re-permission / sunset / prune worklist tied to SEND S (list hygiene) and E (engagement-decay) sub-items. Not for the one-time pre-send authentication pre-flight — use deliverability-qa; not for the consent/suppression record itself — use consent-registry; not for computing the EQS or enforcing vetoes — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件列表健康度监控/退订漂移/沉睡用户清理
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to submit their product to startup, SaaS, AI, agent, MCP, no-code, or review directories for backlinks, domain rating, and discovery. Also use when the user mentions "directory submissions," "submit to directories," "backlinks from directories," "list my product," "submit to Product Hunt," "BetaList," "TAAFT," "Futurepedia," "G2 listing," "Capterra listing," "AlternativeTo," "SaaSHub," "AI directories," "MCP registry," "agent directory," "dofollow backlinks," "launch directories," or "directory tracker." Use this whenever someone is planning the directory layer of a product launch or an ongoing backlink campaign. For the broader launch moment, see launch. For programmatic SEO pages that should live behind these backlinks, see programmatic-seo. For AI citation optimization, see ai-seo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
差分が「その差分自身を審査するレビュー基準・品質ゲート」を弱めていないかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 レビュールールの削除・弱体化（.river/rules.md / .river/rules.d/*）、Check 2 実行時コンフィグの閾値・ゲート緩和（.river-review.{json,yaml,yml} の review.severity 引き下げ / exclude 拡大 / memory.suppressionEnabled 無効化 / selection.skills.exclude 追加）、Check 3 suppression entry の新規追加、Check 4 lint・静的解析設定からのルール削除や無効化、Check 5 branch protection・required check の緩和、の 5 Check を対象とし、これらが機能変更と同一 PR に混在し、かつ意図の宣言が無い場合に指摘する。report-only。workflow の permissions / action pin は gha-workflow-security、既存 suppression entry の使い分けは suppression-feedback、設定ファイルの一般的妥当性は config-json、.only / .skip / @ts-ignore / @ts-nocheck は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器、リファクタと機能追加の混在は behavior-structure-separation へ委譲する