950 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
An overview of the core data API of ObsPy, a Python framework for processing seismological data. It is useful for parsing common seismological file formats, or manipulating custom data into standard objects for downstream use cases such as ObsPy's signal processing routines or SeisBench's modeling API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply STRIDE methodology to systematically identify threats. Use when analyzing system security, conducting threat modeling sessions, or creating security documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master modern SQL with cloud-native databases, OLTP/OLAP optimization, and advanced query techniques. Expert in performance tuning, data modeling, and hybrid analytical systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database optimization or complex analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert startup business analyst specializing in market sizing, financial modeling, competitive analysis, and strategic planning for early-stage companies. Use PROACTIVELY when the user asks about market opportunity, TAM/SAM/SOM, financial projections, unit economics, competitive landscape, team planning, startup metrics, or business strategy for pre-seed through Series A startups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create financial projections", "build a financial model", "forecast revenue", "calculate burn rate", "estimate runway", "model cash flow", or requests 3-5 year financial planning for a startup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert security auditor specializing in DevSecOps, comprehensive cybersecurity, and compliance frameworks. Masters vulnerability assessment, threat modeling, secure authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), OWASP standards, cloud security, and security automation. Handles DevSecOps integration, compliance (GDPR/HIPAA/SOC2), and incident response. Use PROACTIVELY for security audits, DevSecOps, or compliance implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consolidated Responsible AI standards reference: NIST AI RMF 1.0, AI STRIDE threat-modeling overlay, EU AI Act risk tiers, and an open-standards catalog with phase mapping
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design data-driven Godot 4.7 games with custom Resource classes: define typed data with class_name + @export, save/load .tres/.res files, instance and duplicate resources, and load on demand with ResourceLoader (incl. threaded loading). Use when modeling items/stats/configs as data in a Godot project, creating .tres resources, or working with custom Resource subclasses and ResourceLoader/ResourceSaver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collects real financial data for any US publicly traded company from free public sources (yfinance) and outputs structured JSON for downstream skills (DCF modeling, comps analysis, earnings review): market data, historical financials, WACC inputs, analyst estimates — never fabricated fallback values. Use to collect or pull financial/market data, or gather DCF inputs, for a ticker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs database schemas, indexing strategies, query optimization, and migration patterns for SQL and NoSQL databases. Use when designing tables, optimizing queries, fixing N+1 problems, planning migrations, or when asked about database performance, normalization, ORMs, or data modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users move from reactive feature-building to strategic resource allocation by applying rigorous scoring, financial modeling, and portfolio balancing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement server APIs, authentication, and application data access. Schema modeling and query tuning use oma-db.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Database specialist for SQL, NoSQL, and vector database modeling, schema design, normalization, indexing, transactions, integrity, concurrency control, backup, capacity planning, data standards, anti-pattern review, and compliance-aware database design. Use for database, schema, ERD, table design, document model, vector index design, RAG retrieval architecture, migration, query tuning, glossary, capacity estimation, backup strategy, database anti-pattern remediation work, and ISO 27001, ISO 27002, or ISO 22301-aware database recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations, race conditions, reward abuse, etc. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/businesslogic-results.md. Use when asked to find business logic, logic flaws, or abuse-of-function bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when framing the system and describing the model for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript — defining system boundaries, components, hierarchical levels, and feedbacks, then choosing, describing, and calibrating the model (process/simulation, whole-farm, bio-economic, agent-based, or integrated assessment). This is the distinctive core of an AgSy paper. Structures the model and system; it does not run code for you.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile gene trees against a species tree under probabilistic models of duplication, transfer, and loss (DTL) using ALE (Szöllősi 2013 amalgamated likelihood), GeneRax (Morel 2020 ML reconciliation), AleRax (Morel 2024 co-estimation), Whale.jl (Bayesian DL+WGD), RANGER-DTL 2 parsimony, NOTUNG, ecceTERA, and Treerecs. Use when inferring ancestral gene-family content, distinguishing duplication from horizontal transfer from differential loss, rooting deep species trees from gene-content signals (STRIDE / Williams 2017 ALE-rooting), counting DTL events per branch, refining noisy gene trees against a species tree, modeling WGD events jointly with DTL, or producing publication-grade gene-family histories for phylogenomic / comparative analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and analyze pangenomes for prokaryotes (Panaroo, PPanGGOLiN, PEPPAN, GET_HOMOLOGUES, anvi'o pangenomics) and eukaryotes (Minigraph-Cactus, PGGB, vg pangenome graphs). Implement Tettelin core/accessory/cloud genome decomposition (Tettelin 2005), Heap's law open/closed pangenome modeling, gene presence/absence GWAS (Scoary, pyseer), pangenome graph variant calling (vg, PanGenie), and structural-variation graph indexing. Use when assembling species- or genus-level pan-gene catalogs, separating core from accessory/shell/cloud genes, testing gene-content associations with phenotypes, building pangenome graphs from haplotype-resolved assemblies, calling SVs from pangenome graphs, or selecting between bacterial-pangenome and eukaryotic-pangenome workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Batch effect correction for CRISPR screens covering ComBat empirical-Bayes, RUV, SVA, control-sgRNA normalization, and the model-based alternative of including batch as a covariate in MAGeCK MLE or Chronos. Covers screen-specific batch sources (passage cohort, library lot, infection day, sequencing run, Cas9 lot, FBS lot), PCA + variance-decomposition diagnostic to decide if correction is needed, when correction harms biology by over-correcting condition into batch, limma removeBatchEffect for visualization-only correction, and relationship to multi-condition design matrices. Use when combining screens for joint analysis, when passage cohort confounds biology, when DepMap-style panels need Chronos with batch covariates, when picking ComBat vs RUV, or when correction harms biology and should be replaced with explicit covariate modeling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer integer allele-specific copy number, tumor purity, and ploidy from tumor sequencing by jointly modeling read depth (logR) and B-allele frequency (BAF) with ASCAT, Sequenza, FACETS, PURPLE, and PureCN (tumor-only). Covers the purity-ploidy identifiability problem, the diploid-baseline (dipLogR) anchor, major/minor copy number, loss of heterozygosity, sunrise/contour fit diagnostics, and reconciliation of conflicting fits. Use when tumor analysis needs absolute copy number rather than relative log2, when estimating purity and ploidy, calling LOH or copy-neutral LOH, resolving whole-genome doubling, running tumor-only allele-specific calling, or choosing among ASCAT, Sequenza, FACETS, and PureCN.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds QSAR / QSPR models using chemprop D-MPNN, MolFormer, Uni-Mol, ChemBERTa, random forest baselines, and Gaussian processes with explicit handling of OECD 5 principles, applicability domain (kNN, leverage, conformal prediction, Mahalanobis), scaffold-balanced splits, ensemble uncertainty, calibration (Platt, isotonic), feature importance (SHAP, atomic attribution), and prospective validation. Use when building target-specific predictive models from in-house bioassay data, ADMET endpoints, or selectivity profiles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。