「only」の検索結果

Modern C# idioms for any .NET project (C# 10+, .NET 6+): nullable reference types, records, readonly structs, primary constructors, pattern matching, async/await with CancellationToken, IDisposable/IAsyncDisposable, file-scoped namespaces, var usage, naming conventions (PascalCase members, _camelCase fields, I-prefixed interfaces), and class design rules. Apply whenever the project is a .NET 6+ project. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every .NET plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write self-documenting immutable value types with records and readonly structs. - Handle nullable reference types explicitly to eliminate NullReferenceException at compile time. - Implement async/await correctly with CancellationToken propagation and ConfigureAwait(false) in libraries. - Dispose unmanaged resources correctly via IDisposable / IAsyncDisposable and using statements. - Apply C# pattern matching (switch expressions, property patterns, list patterns) for cleaner branching logic. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-specific idioms (ASP.NET Core controllers, minimal APIs, EF Core — those live in aspnet-core-plugin skills). - Build tooling (dotnet CLI, NuGet, csproj) — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-tooling. - Testing patterns — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to execute or investigate a PromQL expression against a Prometheus server. Read-only HTTP queries only. No source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Release one current Proto UI work-item claim when it expired, became invalid, or the contributor stopped. Use only for the contributor's own recorded claim and only when the exact reversible GitHub mutation is authorized. Do not select replacement work, change readiness, or release another contributor's claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Minimum Sufficient Work (MSW) principle through the MSW Kernel to scope, execute, verify, and stop agent work. State the requested outcome and smallest proof, admit a claim only when deleting it would leave the contract unmet or unproven, do and prove each necessary claim, and halt at the fixed point. Use for implementation, debugging, review, research, planning, documentation, or any task where scope control, proportional evidence, or avoiding overwork matters. Also use when the user says MSW, Minimum Sufficient Work, do only what is necessary, avoid over-engineering, or stop when the result is proven.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Codex Optimized Development, Evaluation, and Remediation (CODER) Loop with an orchestration-only coordinator, non-overlapping task-family owners, fresh independent reviewers, evidence-scoped remediation, and final coordinator acceptance. Discover and compose optional MSW, Timebox, MSL, and Codex Voice Optimizer companions as the Slopware Dev Stack without making them dependencies. Use in Codex when the user invokes the CODER Loop, asks to divide a complex change into bounded implementation families with independent reviewers, requests multi-agent implementation without overlapping ownership, requires review and repair until every blocking gap is independently rechecked, asks for the CODER tutorial or Slopware Dev Stack, or wants CODER to install or use its companions. Do not trigger for an ordinary single-agent change, a review-only request, or a non-Codex host.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为 msModelSlim 创建基础 Transformers 模型适配器（Model Adapter）。 包含创建适配器、实现必需接口与注册安装流程。 适用：Decoder-only LLM、理解类 VLM（仅 LLM/text 部分）。 多模态生成（DiT/扩散，含双/多专家）见下方「多模态生成扩展」节，按需加载。 不适用：Encoder-only、非 Transformers 架构。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build native UI with the @expo/ui package: real SwiftUI on iOS and Jetpack Compose on Android rendered from React in an Expo or React Native app. Covers universal cross-platform components (Host, Column, Row, Button, Text, List, and more imported from @expo/ui), drop-in replacements for popular React Native community libraries (BottomSheet, DateTimePicker, Slider, Menu, etc.), and platform-specific SwiftUI (@expo/ui/swift-ui, iOS only) and Jetpack Compose (@expo/ui/jetpack-compose, Android only) trees and modifiers. Use when adding or reviewing @expo/ui Host/RNHostView trees, building native-feeling UI where standard React Native components fall short (grouped settings forms with toggles, sections, menus, sheets, pickers, sliders), choosing between universal and platform-specific components, or replacing an RN community UI library with a native @expo/ui equivalent. Not for custom native modules, Expo Router navigation, Reanimated, or data fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a new Tip in the ai-product-dev-tips repository following the existing directory/format conventions, and register its link in the root README.md. Use this whenever the user wants to add, create, or write a new Tip in this repo — e.g. "nlp_processing に〜の Tip を追加して", "新しい Tips を作って", "〜の解説 Tip を書いて", "this repo に〜のネタを追加". It picks the right category and next sequential number, matches the README format of nearby Tips, generates code scaffolding (Dockerfile / requirements.txt / *_cpu.sh / *_gpu.sh / *.py) only when the Tip needs runnable code, and inserts the link into the correct <details> section of the root README. Trigger this even if the user doesn't say the word "skill" — any request to add a new entry to this Tips collection should use it.

Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need host reconnaissance for an IP or domain — open ports, services, banners, OS detection, vulnerabilities. For domains, resolves DNS first then queries the IP. Commonly invoked by /ip-investigation and /domain-investigation. Retrieval only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to check an IP, domain, file hash, or URL against AlienVault OTX community pulses. Returns pulse count, key pulses, tags, related indicators, and passive DNS. Commonly invoked by investigation skills to pull community context. Retrieval only — does not interpret.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export the current chat session as a structured Markdown work timeline or blog-draft seed. Use when the user asks for a session log, work log, timeline, 作業ログ, ブログネタ, blog draft, article seed, Zenn, Qiita, or はてな. Do not use for verbatim dialogue export or distilled reusable knowledge only.

Build a new-topic PPTX by reusing an existing reference deck's template (layouts / footers / fonts / palette) while replacing all content from primary sources. Use when "use this product deck's look for a different product deck", "use this deck as template for new topic", "参照デックの体裁で別内容を作る", "既存 PPTX を流用して別テーマで作り直す". Not for deck translation, from-scratch generation, or outline-only planning.

Investigate Azure incidents and service degradations with a read-only workflow using Azure CLI, Resource Health, Activity Log, metrics, resource logs, and official Microsoft docs. Use when troubleshooting Azure outages, Resource Health alerts, Azure Firewall or DNS failures, ExpressRoute or BGP instability, VM availability problems, AKS incidents, App Service failures, database connectivity issues, Entra ID sign-in problems, load balancer issues, platform-vs-workload cutover, or drafting a troubleshooting report. Triggers on 'Azure トラブルシューティング', '障害調査', '切り分け', 'Resource Health', '復旧確認', 'Azure Firewall', 'DNS', 'ExpressRoute', 'VPN Gateway', 'BGP', 'AKS', 'App Service', 'SQL', 'PostgreSQL', 'Cosmos DB', 'Entra ID', 'incident', 'degraded', 'unavailable'.

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid. Also use for Archify, interactive or animated HTML diagrams, インタラクティブ図, 動く構成図. When an editable .drawio file is required, use the draw.io workflow instead and treat Archify HTML only as a supplement.

Skippable Phase 0 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use only on declared need for higher-quality Stage-2 evidence: a promotion candidate, or a skill that gaia-meta-sweep flagged as under-evidenced. Given a skill id, source repo/context, and needed evidence types (benchmark-result, arxiv, peer-review, social-signal), it runs Firecrawl searches, scrapes top hits to markdown, and appends discovered sources into Phase 1 inputs. Missing benchmark evidence is recorded as benchmark-source candidates first, not direct scoring rows. Trigger phrases: "discover evidence", "find new evidence", "Phase 0", "run ev-discovery", "search for benchmarks/papers", "under-evidenced", "promotion candidate needs stronger proof". This is the ONLY ev-* skill that searches the web for NEW evidence; other ev-* skills aggregate or verify known sources. Requires Firecrawl to be usable (`firecrawl --status` authenticated OR FIRECRAWL_API_KEY set); skips gracefully when neither holds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fixed-topology, discovery-only extension for Gaia curation. Atomically checkpoints each candidate transition, retries only the failed field, and stops at human L4 review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Replace sentence-by-sentence revised or paraphrased text back into an original paper or document while preserving the original formatting, typography, paragraph settings, citation layout, and document conventions as the source of truth. Use when the user provides revised text that maps back to original sentences, paragraphs, sections, or the whole document, but may also contain clear local sentence merges or splits, and asks to replace it back into the source, keep the original formatting, do sentence-by-sentence replacement, preserve original formatting, or only swap wording without rewriting the document. Only allow minimal edits to the rewritten text when fixing citation formatting, restoring protected original content, restoring the original person reference, or minimally splitting/merging text back into original sentence slots; otherwise do not improve grammar, style, logic, or wording.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enable a Skia + Dawn GPU build of Pulp (MacGpuWindowHost, Skia Graphite). Covers the prebuilt skia-builder binaries, the headers-only fresh-worktree trap, reusing another checkout's cached libs via SKIA_DIR, FindSkia layouts, verifying PULP_HAS_SKIA / MacGpuWindowHost, and the raster-fallback + GPU-wedge gotchas. Use whenever GPU rendering "doesn't work" or a build silently came up CPU-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Place pre-screened literature citations into a LaTeX or Word manuscript, or restyle the citations already in one. Three modes: (1) inline placement — inline \cite{}/\citet{}/\citep{} with a compiled references.bib, for author-date journals (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago author-date, IEEE, Vancouver); (2) footnote placement — full formatted \footnote{} or OOXML footnotes for legal and notes styles (Bluebook, OSCOLA, Chicago, APA, McGill) with Id./supra short forms; (3) restyle — convert existing footnote citations from one style to another. This skill is manual-invoke ONLY — trigger ONLY when the user explicitly runs /cite-placement or explicitly names the "cite-placement" skill. Do NOT auto-trigger on general citation, footnote, or reference requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round adversarial review pipeline for empirical research output — the chain from data to LaTeX tables to a manuscript that cites them. A Claude drafter proposes minimal diffs, a deterministic mechanical battery gates every diff from a clean state with a regression gate, a Codex reviewer files check-backed critiques, and a blind judge panel decides residual disputes. Manual-invoke ONLY: trigger when the user explicitly runs /adversarial-empirical-review or names 'adversarial-empirical-review' / 'adversarial empirical review'. Do NOT auto-trigger on generic 'review my results', 'check my tables', or manuscript-editing requests. For prose-style refinement use style-emulation instead; this skill AUDITS WHETHER THE TABLES ARE CORRECT — that each number in the tables is what the analysis code computes, reproduces from the data, and is internally consistent. It is an empirical + code review: the manuscript is read only to resolve table numbering, and prose is not examined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a full-site SEO audit and return a scored, prioritized report. Use only for site-wide checks; use seo-page for one URL or seo-technical for a technical-only review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SERP-informed outline generation with H2/H3 heading hierarchy, competitive content gap analysis, section-by-section word count targets, chart and image placement markers, optional FAQ question planning, and internal linking zones. Skeleton only: structure, H2/H3 hierarchy, word counts, optional FAQ slots. Use blog-brief instead if you need full competitive analysis, statistics research, and image suggestions. Lighter than a full content brief, generates article skeleton and structure only, ready for /blog write to consume. Use when user says "outline", "blog outline", "content outline", "structure blog", "plan sections", "article skeleton", "heading structure", "SERP analysis", "competitive outline", "plan article".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。