7,283 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Test across all major browsers. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing security-sensitive web apps, SharedArrayBuffer usage, worker-heavy apps, editors, or measurement features that require cross-origin isolation. Check both headers and real browser behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing scripts, client components, bundles, or runtime behavior related to Handle cross-origin requests securely. Inspect both source code and the browser execution path so fixes target the real bottleneck or bug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial multi-agent planning: a hostile team cross-critiques a plan before it is formalized. Use when planning needs maximum rigor or the user asks for a hyperplan / adversarial or cross-critique plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Application security testing (AppSec) across a whole product with Strix — decide which asset needs which test (source code, running web app, API, CI pipeline), run it, and turn the results into a ranked remediation plan. Autonomous agents exploit and prove each issue instead of emitting static-analysis alerts, so the plan is ordered by what is actually reachable. Use when the user asks for an application security review or audit, an appsec assessment, vulnerability scanning across their stack, a security review before a launch or a customer security questionnaire, or does not yet know which kind of security test they need.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'battle card,' 'battlecard,' 'competitive one-pager,' 'win-loss analysis,' 'why are we losing deals,' 'loss reasons,' 'how do I respond to this objection,' 'prospect just said,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps,' 'cold call script,' or 'voicemail script.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. For public competitor comparison pages, see competitors. For running buyer interviews or churn research, see customer-research. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For the offer being sold (bonuses, guarantees, pricing structure), see offers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert security auditor for AI Skills and Bundles. Performs non-intrusive static analysis to identify malicious patterns, data leaks, system stability risks, and obfuscated payloads across Windows, macOS, Linux/Unix, and Mobile (Android/iOS).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for kernel attack surface, namespace and cgroup boundaries, container isolation assumptions, syscall paths, and escape primitive verification. Use when the user asks to analyze container-to-host escape paths, kernel exploit prerequisites, namespace crossover, capability misuse, or prove whether an exploit primitive crosses the sandbox boundary. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement saga patterns for distributed transactions and cross-aggregate workflows. Use this skill when implementing distributed transactions across microservices where 2PC is unavailable, designing compensating actions for failed order workflows that span inventory, payment, and shipping services, building event-driven saga coordinators for travel booking systems that must roll back hotel, flight, and car rental reservations atomically, or debugging stuck saga states in production where compensation steps never complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
.NET timezone handling guidance for C# applications. Use when working with TimeZoneInfo, DateTimeOffset, NodaTime, UTC conversion, daylight saving time, scheduling across timezones, cross-platform Windows/IANA timezone IDs, or when a .NET user needs the timezone for a city, address, region, or country and copy-paste-ready C# code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile one or more OpenViking knowledge bases or document collections into topic-organized, evidence-grounded high-level knowledge, including cross-source findings, trends, changes, drivers, comparisons, implications, and uncertainties. Use with ov compile when the user asks to distill or synthesize a knowledge base, compare multiple collections, or derive higher-order insights such as changes across financial reports; do not use for document-by-document summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan the portfolio for the highest-leverage AI opportunities and rank where to deploy operating-partner time. Ingests quarterly updates and financials across multiple portfolio companies, identifies quick wins at each, and stacks them into a single ranked action list. Use during quarterly portfolio reviews, annual planning, or when deciding which companies get AI investment first. Triggers on "AI readiness", "AI opportunity scan", "where should we deploy AI", "AI across the portfolio", "AI quick wins", or "which portcos are ready for AI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investment banking presentation quality checker. Reviews a pitch deck or client-ready presentation for (1) number consistency across slides, (2) data-narrative alignment, (3) language polish against IB standards, (4) visual and formatting QC. Use whenever the user asks to review, check, QC, proof, or do a final pass on a deck, pitch, or client materials — including requests like "check my numbers", "reconcile figures across slides", "is this client-ready", or "what am I missing before I send this out".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Factor research framework with IC/IR analysis, quantile backtesting, and factor combination. Suitable for cross-sectional factor evaluation across multiple instruments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional finance research toolkit — backtesting (11 engines + benchmark comparison panel), factor analysis, Alpha Zoo (478 pre-built alphas across qlib158/alpha101/gtja191/academic/fundamental), options pricing, 90 finance skills, 30 multi-agent swarm teams, Trade Journal analyzer, and Shadow Account (extract → backtest → render) across 29 market-data sources (tushare, yfinance, okx, binance, akshare, baostock, tencent, mootdx, ccxt, futu, mt5, tickerall, local, eastmoney, sina, stooq, yahoo, pykrx, india_broker, qveris, longbridge, nobitex, wallex, plus optional-key finnhub/alphavantage/tiingo/fmp/gildata).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect process injection techniques (T1055) - including DLL injection, process hollowing, and APC injection - by analyzing Sysmon Event IDs 1, 7, 8, 10, and 25 for cross-process memory operations, remote thread creation, and anomalous DLL loads. Use when hunting defense-evasion activity that hides code inside legitimate processes, investigating an EDR alert on suspicious cross-process access, or validating Sysmon coverage for injection detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects container escape at runtime across tooling - namespace manipulation, capability abuse, kernel exploits, sensitive host mounts, and anomalous syscalls - and explains which signals matter regardless of whether Falco, Sysdig, auditd, or an EDR is doing the collection. Use when deciding what breakout behaviour to monitor, investigating a suspected Docker or Kubernetes breakout, or comparing escape coverage across runtime sensors. Keywords: container escape, breakout, namespaces, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, privileged, hostPath, kernel exploit, syscall. Do not use for Falco rule syntax itself - use detecting-container-escape-with-falco-rules; for a static configuration sweep use performing-container-escape-detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects insider data exfiltration by analyzing DLP policy violations, file access patterns, upload volume anomalies, and off-hours activity in endpoint and cloud logs. Uses pandas for behavioral analytics and statistical baselines. Use when investigating insider threats or building user behavior analytics for data loss prevention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect compromised cloud credentials across AWS, Azure, and GCP by analyzing anomalous API activity, impossible-travel patterns, and credential-stuffing indicators using GuardDuty, Microsoft Defender for Identity, and Google SCC Event Threat Detection. Use when investigating alerts about cloud API activity from unfamiliar locations, responding to an exposed-credential notification, or scoping a credential compromise.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build threat actor profiles by collecting OSINT from vendor reports, paste sites, dark web forums, social media, and code repos, correlating indicators, mapping adversary infrastructure with tools like Maltego and SpiderFoot, and producing structured dossiers of motivations, capabilities, infrastructure, and TTPs. Use when performing attribution or building an adversary dossier from open-source intelligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-cloud orchestration for ML workloads with automatic cost optimization. Use when you need to run training or batch jobs across multiple clouds, leverage spot instances with auto-recovery, or optimize GPU costs across providers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenAI's model connecting vision and language. Enables zero-shot image classification, image-text matching, and cross-modal retrieval. Trained on 400M image-text pairs. Use for image search, content moderation, or vision-language tasks without fine-tuning. Best for general-purpose image understanding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Distributed training orchestration across clusters. Scales PyTorch/TensorFlow/HuggingFace from laptop to 1000s of nodes. Built-in hyperparameter tuning with Ray Tune, fault tolerance, elastic scaling. Use when training massive models across multiple machines or running distributed hyperparameter sweeps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。