「primary」の検索結果

Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract visual identity from screenshots (primary) or website URL (fallback) and compile into a DESIGN.md-format brand kit — YAML token frontmatter (colors, typography, rounded, spacing, components) + 8 ordered prose sections. The YAML tokens are machine-authoritative; downstream visual skills consume them directly. Writes to marketing/brand/brand-kit.md. Triggers - "brand kit", "brand identity", "visual identity", "design tokens", "extract brand", "DESIGN.md"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a weekly Facebook Page content plan from a theme, audience, and content pillars. Produces per-day picks (short post vs story post, hook formula, angle, posting time, primary goal), a short-to-story post mix, a daily comment-reply target, and a share-optimized goal-mix balance check across shares, comments, and reactions. Use when the user wants to plan a week of Page content. Not for drafting one post (use fb-post-writer) or replying to comments (use fb-engagement-drafter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the threat-modeling phase of a security scan, the user explicitly invokes $threat-model, or the user explicitly asks to create, update, or persist a repository threat model. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OS post-exploitation after a stable host foothold: quiet host recon, host-native persistence (Windows Run/tasks/services/COM/WMI and Linux SSH/cron/systemd/SUID), long-term C2 (Sliver primary, Mythic/Havoc optional), targeted collection and exfil, and engagement cleanup. Does not own AD/cloud/K8s native persistence, Ligolo pivoting, LSASS dumping, or EDR bypass. Operator selects objectives; success is a live callback, verified persistence, delivered loot, or restored host — not generating an unused implant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer the hook from a viral Threads post or thread URL. Identifies which of the 10 canonical 2026 Threads formulas it uses (warm contrarian, data-point, build-in-public, quote-post, mini-list, relatable, listicle, story, curiosity-gap, how-I teardown), explains why it worked, and returns a blank template mapped to your topic with its primary goal (replies, reposts, likes, quotes). Use to learn from a post you admire. Not for writing your own (use threads-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a weekly Threads (Meta) content plan from a theme, audience, and content pillars. Produces per-day recommendations (single post vs thread, Threads hook formula, angle, posting time, primary goal), a single-to-thread mix, daily reply and quote-post targets, and a goal-mix balance check across replies, reposts, likes, and quotes. Use when the user wants to plan a week of Threads content instead of ad-hoc posting. Not for drafting one post or thread (use threads-post-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Primary router skill for broad .NET work. Classify the repo by app model and cross-cutting concern first, then switch to the narrowest matching .NET skill instead of staying at a generic layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide developers in creating Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Use for building MCP tools that enable LLMs to interact with external services. Covers TypeScript (primary) and Python FastMCP (secondary), tool annotations, Zod/Pydantic validation, and evaluation question creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Background orchestrator that drains the system-wide cron-actions-queue.jsonl queue safely, preventing LLM context pollution in the primary router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After /start-task: park the current clean, pushed feature branch in its own issue-numbered nested worktree (.worktrees/<issue#>) and return the primary checkout to current main, so the next parallel lane can start. Use when the user says to move the branch or task to a worktree or open a parallel lane.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided coaching for delegation team lifecycle — create, update, delete, or review the workforce. The primary interface for team management and fleet-level visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and scores Claude Projects using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics and detects seven structural anti-patterns. When global layer info is provided, adds cross-layer alignment findings. Use when user says "audit my project," "review my custom instructions," "score my project," "evaluate my Claude project," "improve my system prompt," "what's wrong with my project," "why is my project underperforming." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project doesn't work right," "Claude is inconsistent in my project," "my Project used to work and now doesn't." Also use when the user pastes Custom Instructions asking why output is poor or generic. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is a global-layer audit (use rootnode-global-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or Memory-only optimization (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rebalances context across Memory, Custom Instructions, knowledge files, and User Preferences in Claude Projects. Audits Memory for redundancy, staleness, and misplacement; prescribes optimization including Codification of stable Memory patterns into explicit User Preferences or Project CI rules. Use when user says "optimize my memory," "what should be in my memory," "trim my knowledge files," "reduce my context usage," "rebalance my project," "what should be in my preferences vs memory," or asks whether something belongs in Memory, a knowledge file, or User Preferences. Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project feels bloated," "Claude keeps forgetting things," "my context window keeps hitting limits." Activate whenever Memory-layer balance is the primary concern. Do NOT use for full Project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or global-layer audits that don't touch Project Memory (use rootnode-global-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a polished release video for a tbh-meter release in the Claude-Code motion style (recreated animated UI + real game sprites + synth soundtrack), to post with a launch. Primary input is a GitHub release LINK — the skill turns it into a video named after that release, covering ONLY the features that shipped in that release, version stamped on the intro. Use when asked to make/update a release video, showcase clip, feature trailer, or promo video for a meter release, or "make the video for <release link>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Log a bias-log / vipassana observation to the memex store the moment a reasoning pattern surfaces, mid-session or at close. Use when you catch a bias in your own reasoning (anchoring, confirmation, trust-the-summary), when a pace tell or verification gap appears, or when meditate/observe produces a reflection worth persisting across sessions. Primary path pipes the body to `memex add` over stdin (`--title` required) then runs the `meditate-vipassana` extractor to make it queryable; secondary path appends a numbered bullet to `docs/OBSERVATIONS.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the fail-early (fail-fast) pattern to detect and report errors at the earliest possible point. Covers input validation with guard clauses, meaningful error messages, assertion functions, and anti-patterns that silently swallow failures. Primary examples in R with general/polyglot guidance. Use when writing functions that accept external input, adding input validation before CRAN submission, refactoring code that silently produces wrong results, reviewing PRs for error-handling quality, or hardening internal APIs against invalid arguments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。