「pta」の検索結果

Product Requirements Document writing - PRD templates, MoSCoW prioritization, user personas, competitive analysis, feature specs, acceptance criteria, risk assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure host-based firewalls (iptables, nftables, UFW) and cloud security groups (AWS, GCP, Azure) with practical rules for common scenarios like web servers, databases, and bastion hosts. Use when exposing services, hardening servers, or implementing network segmentation with defense-in-depth strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instantiate or update a workspace `UNITS.csv` from a selected pipeline and units template (deps/checkpoints/acceptance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute exactly one eligible Unit in an existing research Workspace; use for stepwise or manual semantic execution when status, Attempt, Artifact, Manifest, checkpoint, and acceptance evidence must remain synchronized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect Directory.Packages.props (CPM), composing multi-project solutions (API + tests + library), getting latest NuGet package versions in newly created projects. DO NOT USE FOR: finding templates (use template-discovery), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates (use template-comparison), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), deciding cross-parameter defaults such as which framework to pair with native AOT or whether to keep HTTPS when auth is enabled (use template-smart-defaults), modifying existing projects or adding NuGet packages to existing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use F# Interactive (`dotnet fsi`) for .NET exploration, scriptable experiments, package-backed .fsx workflows, quick data transforms, and reproducible command-line probes. USE FOR: .fsx scripts, F# REPL work, #r nuget references, #load composition, interactive type exploration, and small strongly typed experiments before moving code into a project. DO NOT USE FOR: production application code that needs compiled project structure; C# scripting; long-lived automation better expressed as a normal CLI, test, or build target. INVOKES: run dotnet fsi, edit .fsx scripts, load project or source files, and validate snippets against the target SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured requirements elicitation for analysis requests. Use when scoping new analysis projects, clarifying ambiguous business questions, or documenting analysis acceptance criteria with stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an app, site, bot, or feature end-to-end from a dictated idea — requirements, briefing, spec, tickets, subagents, review, acceptance — with a live dashboard, for users who expect a finished result without reviewing specs or code. Starts only on /autopilot; a bare /autopilot resumes an interrupted run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the creation of detailed agile feature documentation from an existing epic. Use when the user wants to split an epic into feature files, derive features with scope and acceptance criteria, or plan feature documentation for stakeholders or engineering. This should trigger for requests such as Create features from an epic; Split epic into features; Feature files from epic; Derive features from epic; Break down an agile epic into deliverable features. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freshly judge whether a finished change and its claims meet original acceptance: PASS, FAIL or NOT_PROVEN. Use when: asked for a go/no-go, sign-off or independent verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Freshly judge exact subject content against bead or caller acceptance, optionally persist verdict.v2 for a declared consumer, and stop. Triggers: "validate", "independently validate", "vibe".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guía completa de voz de marca NGX "Verdad Directa" con modos de comunicación, adaptación por audiencia y ejemplos aprobados

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement SAFe methodology in Jira. Use when creating Epics, Features, Stories with proper hierarchy, acceptance criteria, and parent-child linking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a broad project request into a small actionable plan with concrete deliverables, dependencies and acceptance checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create comprehensive GitHub issues with TDD plans, acceptance criteria, and agent instructions for autonomous PR lifecycle management

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete Product Owner / Product Manager capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of product practice in active software development: the role and its boundaries, strategy cascade (vision → OKRs → roadmap → backlog), continuous discovery, backlog craft (epics, INVEST stories, acceptance criteria), prioritization frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, WSJF), sprint delivery, metrics (North Star, AARRR), stakeholder management, and anti-patterns. The PO/PM owns what gets built, in what order, and why — including the end-to-end user flows and user journeys. Use when scoping a product or feature, decomposing an idea into outcomes/epics/stories, prioritizing a backlog, defining an MVP, mapping user journeys, measuring success, or saying no to a stakeholder. Pairs with super-ui-ux-design, which owns how each screen looks and behaves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA engineering workflows on top of Playwright. Use when a QA engineer asks to design test cases from a ticket, PRD or acceptance criteria, decide what to automate, write a bug report from a failing test or trace, convert manual test cases (TestRail, Xray, CSV) into Playwright specs with case-ID traceability, or review Playwright test code and pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-shot build pipeline for a complete surface from an outcome recipe — inputs (or defaults) → composition → theme → build order → acceptance bar. Use when the user asks for a whole surface ("build me a dashboard", "hazme un dashboard") and expects a shippable result, not component-level help. Invoke when the user asks for craft on their UI, or mentions 'craft' alongside design / UI / frontend work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a proportionate work plan with outcomes, steps, dependencies and acceptance evidence. Use to plan substantial work or coordinate an approved team; a plan-only request does not authorize implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical rules for finding, creating, and updating Shift GitHub issues. Use whenever the user asks to file, create, open, update, triage, or search for an issue, or when substantial work needs an issue before a pull request. Prevents duplicates and defines acceptance criteria and pull-request closure semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate QA Contract with numbered Gherkin scenarios (G#N) and acceptance criteria (AC#N)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates clear, testable specifications from feature descriptions with user stories. Use when starting a new feature and needing a spec before planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。