本文へ移動
cccskills

「records」の検索結果

973 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Records browser sessions via Playwright and converts video to GIF. Use when creating web UI tutorials or demos showing browser interactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月10日 更新

Point Cowork at your invoices and payments records -- builds an AR aging report, drafts escalating follow-up emails matched to each invoice's age and the client relationship, and runs as a weekly scheduled task so nothing slips past 30 days unnoticed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3402026年10月2日 更新

Merges, appends, joins, and deduplicates multiple CSV, TSV, and Excel files (including multi-sheet workbooks) with pandas - mapping mismatched column names to one schema, normalizing keys, resolving conflicting values, tracking which file each row came from, and verifying the row math. Use when the user wants to combine spreadsheets or exports, stack monthly files, consolidate contact or lead lists, VLOOKUP-style join two sheets on an ID or email, or dedupe records across sources, even if they only say "put these together" or "clean up these lists into one".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3402026年10月2日 更新

Use when building, auditing or freezing a journal submission package from the canonical manuscript. Detects drift between the source and the per-journal submission copy, builds byte-preserving packages with manifests, and records current, stale or frozen status.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aperivue/medsci-skills3372026年10月12日 更新

Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without trusting self-reported success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lingxling/awesome-skills-cn3062026年10月7日 更新

Capture and retrieve durable YYLO Ledger artifact Records with intentional profiles, payload modes, provenance, retention, and secret-safe immutable evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lingxling/awesome-skills-cn3062026年10月7日 更新

Automate Airtable tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): records, bases, tables, fields, views. Always search tools first for current schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lingxling/awesome-skills-cn3062026年10月7日 更新

Audits Records of Processing Activities against supervisory authority templates from CNIL, ICO, and BfDI. Provides completeness scoring, gap identification, and remediation tracking. Activate for RoPA audit, completeness check, supervisory authority readiness, CNIL template, ICO template, BfDI template, gap analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Integrates Records of Processing Activities with privacy management platforms including OneTrust, TrustArc, Collibra, and DataGrail. Covers API-based synchronization, data mapping import, and automated RoPA population from enterprise tools. Activate for RoPA tool setup, OneTrust integration, TrustArc sync, privacy platform configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides DPIA for health and medical data processing covering Art. 9(2)(h)-(j) exemptions, HIPAA crosswalk for transatlantic operations, clinical trial data protection under EU CTR 536/2014, and genetic data specifics under Art. 9(1). Activate for healthcare systems, clinical research, health apps, or medical device data. Keywords: health data, DPIA, Art. 9, clinical trial, genetic data, HIPAA, medical records, special category.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides implementation of the GDPR accountability principle under Articles 5(2) and 24, including documentation requirements for policies, DPIAs, RoPA, training records, and breach logs. Activate when establishing or reviewing accountability measures, preparing evidence portfolios, or demonstrating compliance to supervisory authorities. Keywords: accountability, Article 5(2), Article 24, documentation, compliance evidence, governance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Builds comprehensive data inventory per GDPR Art. 30 Records of Processing Activities. Covers system-by-system discovery, data flow diagramming, third-party identification, and legal basis per category. Keywords: data inventory, data mapping, Art 30, RoPA, data flow, processing activities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guide for building a consent record-keeping system to demonstrate valid consent per GDPR Article 7(1). Covers required fields including timestamp, version, purpose, mechanism, and identity. Implements audit-ready consent receipts per the Kantara Initiative Consent Receipt Specification and supervisory authority expectations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Guides privacy audit evidence collection processes including evidence planning, sampling strategies, documentation standards, chain of custody, interview techniques, system walkthrough procedures, and evidence evaluation. Covers ISO 19011 evidence categories (records, statements of fact, observations) and ISACA audit evidence requirements for privacy compliance assessments. Keywords: audit evidence, evidence collection, sampling, chain of custody, audit documentation, interview techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills3032026年3月17日 更新

Scores a riso film or reworks its score. Designs the cue list from the film's FILM.md events, builds a deterministic renderAudio() from the sound kit in studies/sound.html, iterates with tools/audio.mjs, gates determinism, length, loudness and sync, and records measured results in FILM.md. Use for "score this film", "add sound/music", "the climax is too loud", "fix the handoff at 16 s", "check the mix", sound effects, foley or a soundtrack on a riso film. Not for drawing or motion (riso-film) or changing tools/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sevenevesai/riso-windowseat2922026年9月25日 更新

Report how many problems the two brains found: mutual review (the other model checks the work, from the peer-review records) and self-check (an agent finds its own error in its own conversation, judged by that agent's own model), side by side. Use when the owner asks whether the second agent or the reviews are worth it, or wants the week's review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sno-ai/sno-station-skills2882026年10月13日 更新

Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness. Produces a concise review pack, records risks and verification, and blocks landing until a human explicitly approves or approves with required fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

majiayu000/spellbook2872026年10月8日 更新

Creates and updates coding standards, conventions, rules, and guidelines for the current project. Use when creating new standards from scratch, converting existing documents into coding standards, or updating existing standards. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not write feature or system documentation — use project-documentation for that. Does not research open-ended options — use research. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testdouble/han2832026年10月1日 更新

Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testdouble/han2832026年10月1日 更新

Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testdouble/han2832026年10月1日 更新

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testdouble/han2832026年10月1日 更新

Creates or updates project documentation for a feature, system, or component and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants feature or system documentation written to Confluence, posted to a Confluence space or page, or synced to a Confluence location. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not document to local files only — use project-documentation for that. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence for that. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence for that. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard. Does not produce runbooks — use runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testdouble/han2832026年10月1日 更新

beeple

無料

Beeple integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Beeple data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

membranedev/application-skills2672026年4月28日 更新

ayrshare

無料

Ayrshare integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Ayrshare data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

membranedev/application-skills2672026年4月28日 更新