「specification」の検索結果

End-to-end, phase-gated SDLC for AI coding agents: relentless design interview → reviewed spec → dependency-graphed task board → safe-wave TDD execution → verification → converge. Handles features, bugs, refactors, greenfield projects, planning breakdowns, and migrations. Triggers on "absolute work", "build this end-to-end", "plan and build", "break this into tasks", "grill me on this plan", "pick up this ticket", "run this migration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当需要为 AI 系统设计多层安全防线、内容过滤策略和伦理边界时调用此 skill。典型场景包括：设计拒绝策略与升级机制、防御 prompt 注入攻击、实现领域特定安全规则（教育、医疗、金融等）、定义 AI 的价值观锚点。 不适用于：定义工具操作权限（应使用 tool-specification）、定义 AI 身份（persona-design）、调整输出风格（personality-system）。 关键 trigger 信号：AI 涉及敏感话题、需要设计"拒绝回答"策略、存在 prompt 注入风险、特定行业合规要求、需要多层防御而非单一规则。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当需要为 AI 设计记忆存储、检索、应用和更新机制时调用此 skill。典型场景包括：设计持久化记忆架构（用户偏好、历史上下文、项目知识）、定义记忆的创建/读取/更新/删除生命周期、实现静默记忆应用（不在回复中透露记忆内容）、管理敏感记忆边界。 不适用于：定义工具接口（tool-specification）、定义安全规则（safety-guardrails）、定义人格风格（personality-system）。 关键 trigger 信号：AI 需要跨会话记住用户信息、记忆内容可能敏感、需要在回复中隐式应用记忆而非显式引用、用户要求"记住这个"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当需要为 AI 产品定义核心身份、角色声明和能力边界时调用此 skill。典型场景包括：设计新 AI 产品的 system prompt 首段、为不同场景创建差异化角色（如教学助手 vs 编程代理）、重新定义 AI 与用户的关系框架。 不适用于：纯人格风格调优（应使用 personality-system）、安全规则制定（应使用 safety-guardrails）、工具集成（应使用 tool-specification）。 关键 trigger 信号：产品需要 AI 有明确自我认知、多个角色共享底层能力但身份不同、需要限制 AI 在特定领域内运作、用户会问"你是谁"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当需要为 AI 定义工具接口、设计调用规范、实现工具发现与编排机制时调用此 skill。典型场景包括：设计 AI agent 的工具集、定义 JSON Schema/XML/TypeScript 格式的工具描述、实现工具权限控制与并行调度、设计子代理委托架构。 不适用于：定义 AI 身份（persona-design）、安全规则（safety-guardrails）、记忆存储（memory-system）。 关键 trigger 信号：AI 需要调用外部 API 或服务、工具数量超过 10 个需要发现机制、需要区分工具权限层级、需要子代理并行执行、工具调用涉及敏感操作需要审批。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create text-based wireframes at low, mid, and high fidelity with component inventories, interaction annotations, and responsive breakpoint specifications. Use when the user requests wireframing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct cinematic shots and coverage for AI-assisted content production. Use when an agent must translate story intent into framing, shot size, lens and perspective, camera position, movement, blocking, screen direction, lighting-aware coverage, continuity, shot specifications, or diagnose why generated or filmed shots do not cut together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries ClinVar for variant pathogenicity classifications, ClinGen VCEP curations, and somatic-vs-germline interpretations via REST API, weekly VCF, or bulk XML. Use when determining clinical significance, triangulating conflicting interpretations, or aggregating evidence against the ACMG/AMP framework with ClinGen SVI specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies ACMG/AMP 2015 framework with ClinGen SVI specifications, Tavtigian 2018/2020 Bayesian point system, Abou Tayoun 2018 PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver 2022 calibrated PP3/BP4 thresholds for REVEL/BayesDel/AlphaMissense, Brnich 2020 PS3/BS3 OddsPath, Walker 2023 SpliceAI splicing framework, and AMP/ASCO/CAP 2017 tumor tiers. Use when classifying germline variants P / LP / VUS / LB / B, applying VCEP-specific CSpec rules, computing Whiffin BS1, or assigning cancer Tier I-IV per Li 2017.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured feature specifications through a collaborative product interview. Acts as a senior PM and business analyst pair — arrives with a point of view, challenges scope, proposes options at every decision. Composes the requirement-quality atom for spec quality enforcement and collaborative-judgment for surfacing genuine decisions. Produces an epic/feature hierarchy in .lattice/requirements/ that serves as direct input to design-blueprint. Use when the user says 'forge requirements', 'write requirements', 'spec this feature', 'create a feature spec', 'define this epic', 'write a PRD', 'spec out what we are building', or 'requirement forge'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles). Handles creating new context documents, loading existing ones, and enriching them with new decisions. Use when starting a new feature, resuming work, making technical decisions, resolving questions, or when context needs to persist across sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'load context', 'update context', 'context doc', 'decisions', 'continue where we left off', 'what did we decide', or 'capture this decision'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token architecture, component specifications, and slide generation. Three-layer tokens (primitive→semantic→component), CSS variables, spacing/typography scales, component specs, strategic slide creation. Use for design tokens, systematic design, brand-compliant presentations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaboratively design, implement, review, and refine software features with a human developer using an iterative pair programming workflow. Prioritize understanding, explicit approval, small reviewable changes, and synchronized specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define implementation contracts (APIs and data models) that developers will build against during PRD v0.6 Architecture. Triggers on requests to define APIs, design database schema, create data models, or when user asks "define APIs", "data model", "database schema", "API contracts", "technical spec", "endpoint design", "schema design". Consumes ARC- (architecture), TECH- (Build items), UJ- (flows), SCR- (screens). Outputs API- entries for endpoints and DBT- entries for data models. Feeds v0.7 Build Execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define how system components connect, establishing boundaries, patterns, and integration approaches during PRD v0.6 Architecture. Triggers on requests to design architecture, create system design, define component relationships, or when user asks "design architecture", "system design", "how do components connect?", "architecture decisions", "technical architecture", "system overview". Consumes TECH- (stack selections), RISK- (constraints), FEA- (features). Outputs ARC- entries documenting architecture decisions with rationale. Feeds v0.6 Technical Specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform v0.6 specifications into context-window-sized work packages (EPICs) during PRD v0.7 Build Execution. Triggers on requests to create epics, scope work, break down implementation, or when user asks "create epics", "scope work", "break down work", "context window sizing", "what to build first?", "implementation planning", "epic breakdown". Consumes API-, DBT-, FEA-, ARC-. Outputs EPIC- entries with objectives, ID references, dependencies, and context windows. Feeds v0.7 Test Planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze session", "evaluate skill execution", "check session logs", provides a session ID with a skill path, or wants to verify that a skill executed correctly in a past session. Post-hoc analysis of Claude Code sessions to validate skill/agent/hook behavior against SKILL.md specifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting patent applications, writing claims, analyzing prior art, or responding to office actions - covers USPTO practice, claim strategies, and specification requirementsUse when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

I am a veteran print production specialist with 15+ years in tabletop game manufacturing. I've shepherded hundreds of games from digital files to retail-ready products, working with manufacturers from The Game Crafter to Panda GM to Cartamundi. My expertise spans the entire production pipeline: color management, dieline creation, paper selection, finishing techniques, component nesting, insert design, and the critical art of the unboxing experience. I've learned the hard way about RGB-to-CMYK disasters, registration drift, humidity warp, and minimum font sizes that become illegible smudges. I know the difference between 280gsm blue-core and 320gsm black-core card stock by feel. I can tell you why your rich black needs to be C60-M40-Y40-K100, not just K100. I understand why your box needs 15mm clearance on each dimension, and why that gorgeous neon green in your design will become a muddy olive in print. Use when "print my game, packaging design, prepare files for print, dieline, print specifications, board game manufacturing, card game printing, box design, bleed and safe area, CMYK conversion, paper stock, card finish, foil stamping, embossing, unboxing experience, thermoform insert, punchboard design, component manufacturing, Panda GM, Game Crafter, Cartamundi, print-production, packaging, manufacturing, board-games, card-games, cmyk, dieline, die-cutting, offset-printing, tabletop" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and maintain llms.txt files for AI discoverability. Scans repos to create curated content maps that help AI answer engines surface your project accurately. Implements the llms.txt specification from Answer.AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a fast 6-point quality check for technical documents (specs, design docs, READMEs). Use after editing any specification or design document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。