「writing」の検索結果

Case studies of American screenwriting (美国电影剧作案例) — Mei Feng's readings of the Hollywood Western (value pairs, four oppositions), screwball comedy (strong heroine, buddy vs adversary two-hander), Billy Wilder (disguise, Lubitsch touch, meet-cute), Hitchcock and his writers, Adaptation, Mildred Pierce (eight drafts, woman's film + noir), Thelma & Louise ("but" method, mirror pair), Fargo (Coen method), Good Will Hunting (five-part structure), American Beauty (POV strategy, genre mix), Eternal Sunshine (1:5:1, image motifs); Walter's American Graffiti; the Hollywood masterclass films (Bourne, Guardians, Zootopia, Thor); Hoxter's Winter's Bone and Jojo Rabbit; Snyder's Miss Congeniality; Field's Chinatown. Use when you want a worked example of how a specific American film's script is built, when analysing a film for structure, character or theme, or when looking for a model to imitate for a Western, screwball, noir, buddy, coming-of-age, black comedy or non-linear romance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scene and sequence craft (场景/段落/细节/道具/悬念/情趣) — merged from Robert McKee's scene design and five-step scene analysis (value turn, beats, text/subtext, turning points, pacing, image systems), McKee's Dialogue scene types (balanced, comic, asymmetric, indirect, reflexive, minimal), Syd Field's sequence and scene elements, Neill Hicks (less is more, enter late leave early, energy), Richard Walter (action over talk, small gestures, avoid phones/cars/restaurants, list twelve alternative locations), Wendy Henson (action paragraphs, transitions, story-doing), Julian Hoxter (scene beats, objectives and tactics), Mei Feng's value test, and Lu Jun's chapters 意趣要足 (suspense, delay, wit), 细节要妙, 道具要精, 场景要当. Use when writing or fixing a single scene, choosing a location, building a sequence, planting a prop or detail, designing suspense and delay, cutting a scene that "nothing happens" in, or turning talk into action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing plays and screenplays in the Chekhovian mode (契诃夫戏剧法) — distilled from the complete plays (没有父亲的人/普拉东诺夫, 伊凡诺夫, 林妖→万尼亚舅舅, 海鸥, 三姊妹, 樱桃园, nine one-acts) plus Chekhov's own letters, Stanislavsky's and Nemirovich-Danchenko's rehearsal notes and 焦菊隐/童道明 criticism. Covers the four-act mood-based structure without central climax, off-stage events, "correct answer stated in Act 1 and refused", the announced event that never happens, three-layer endings (hope monologue + nihilist line + household action), no-villain conflict with environment, every character's object and catchphrase, one-way love chains, half-step-off dialogue, philosophy cut by thirst, the shortest words for the deepest pain, stage-direction and sound discipline, and how Chekhov revised The Wood Demon into Uncle Vanya. Use when the user wants an ensemble drama, a "nothing happens" play, subtext-heavy dialogue, a family estate / provincial story, an anti-climactic structure, or asks how to "Chekhov-ize" a script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

From an idea to a sellable series design; series engine / franchise, story pattern, character webs that keep generating conflict, pilot types, and the documents that sell them (剧集引擎/franchise/故事模式/人物网/试播集类型/剧集圣经/跳板/提案). Merged from Rabkin's four-element franchise and story landmines, Landau's tacit contract and pitch recipe, Oberg's series types and bible specs, Douglas's franchise-plus-springboard and bible tiers, Goldberg & Rabkin's 100-episode test, Blum's concept/presentation/bible ladder, Miller's ten-component treatment, Calvisi's Compelling Crisis, Smith's series format, plus engines read off Sopranos, Fleabag and Succession. Use when turning an idea into a series, testing whether a premise has legs, choosing premise vs typical-episode pilot, designing a sustainable character web, writing a logline, pitch document, bible or treatment, picking a series type, adapting IP into a series, or diagnosing a project that feels "more like a movie than a series".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Worked full-length scripts of banqiang-system Chinese opera with their creation records (板腔体全本语料库). Primary texts; 翁偶虹《锁麟囊》 (the revised score edition, 65 arias, 15 self-account-vs-score checks), 汪曾祺等《沙家浜》 (the 1965 text, not the 1970 one; 36 arias, a 12-row two-version diff), 田汉《白蛇传》 (the 1955 book, not the web revision; 16 scenes, 王瑶卿说腔五条), 杨兰春《朝阳沟》 (1978 revival, 50 arias, 口语入唱, per-scene sung/spoken ratios), 魏明伦《潘金莲》 (跨时空, missing pages), 罗怀臻's 越剧《李清照》《真假驸马》, 淮剧《金龙与蜉蝣》, 甬剧《典妻》; plus index tables of 翁偶虹's 60 创作记 and 范钧宏's seven 改编札记. Use when you want to see how a 唱工戏 lays out its 板式, need real scene counts, aria counts and 辙口 to imitate, want the road from raw material to 审腔, are writing a 现代戏 or colloquial lyrics, or compare one author across two声腔 systems. Method is in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang; this skill holds the worked scripts and their creation records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch and analyze WeChat Official Account hot articles / 公众号爆款文章 by sector or keywords. Use when the user asks for 爆款文章分析, 赛道爆款, 公众号爆款数据, reading counts, likes, shares, comments, title patterns, writing style, 爆款原因分析, or writing references for content creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chinese AI/tech writing de-AI editor for posts, X/Twitter threads, technical essays, product notes, model reviews, and public-writing drafts. Use when the user asks to 去AI味, 改得像本人, 写推特post, 精修中文AI技术文章, or complains about AI-flavored shells such as 不是A而是B, 真正/其实/本质上, 更重要的是, 冒号讲义腔, 空泛总结, 顺滑但没作者判断的稿子.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent AI 写作特征识别。扫描文案中的 AI 生成痕迹，输出检测报告。默认只诊断不改。 触发方式：/dbs-ai-check、/AI检测、「帮我看看有没有 AI 味」「检测一下 AI 特征」 AI writing fingerprint detection. Scans copy for AI-generated patterns and outputs a diagnostic report. Diagnosis only by default. Trigger: /dbs-ai-check, "check for AI writing", "does this sound like AI"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, question, suggest, or fact-preservingly revise a press release, blog post, contributed article, or expert explainer so AI answer systems can more easily retrieve, understand, quote, and cite its useful information. Use when someone asks for AI visibility, AI search, answer-engine, AEO, GEO, AI Overview, or ChatGPT citation optimization of supplied writing; when they want an evidence-aware pre-publication audit; or when another Newsjack workflow needs a prose-level AI-discoverability pass. Do not use as a technical SEO audit, rank tracker, publishing system, or promise of rankings, mentions, citations, traffic, or coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write publication-ready ML/AI/Systems papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM, OSDI, NSDI, ASPLOS, SOSP. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and edit React Native Storybook stories using Component Story Format (CSF). Use when writing .stories.tsx files, adding stories to React Native components, configuring Storybook addons (controls, actions, backgrounds, notes), setting up argTypes, decorators, parameters, or working with portable stories for testing. Applies to any task involving @storybook/react-native story authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a source-derived writing style profile from real posts, essays, launch notes, docs, or site copy, then reuse that profile across content, outreach, and social workflows. Use when the user wants voice consistency without generic AI writing tropes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Korean prose humanizer for Codex and Superloopy that rewrites Korean text so it sounds naturally human while preserving meaning, register, facts, protected tokens, and evidence. Use when the user asks to remove Korean AI tells, make Korean copy sound human, fix 번역투, remove ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini tone, polish Korean without changing meaning, or says "AI 티 없애줘", "AI 윤문", "번역투 고쳐", "사람이 쓴 것처럼", "humanize Korean", "한글 AI 티 제거", "글 자연스럽게 다듬어줘". Inspired by Korean AI-tell ideas from https://github.com/epoko77-ai/im-not-ai. Handles Korean rewriting only; not for translation, fact expansion, SEO rewriting, legal drafting, or generic proofreading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure your own writing corpus for the words and sentence shapes you over-use, so an agent writing in your voice stops amplifying your tics into a style. Produces a counted baseline file and checks any new draft against it. Use when an agent's drafts start sounding like a caricature of you, before publishing anything written in your voice, or every ten new pieces to re-measure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for full-manuscript prose and narrative craft on an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — voice, structure, and the storytelling ASQ is known for. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing the response document for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) Revise & Resubmit — structuring point-by-point replies that show the theory was genuinely strengthened, not just defended. Drafts the response; revise the manuscript's theory FIRST (amr-theory-development / amr-data-analysis) before writing the letter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when polishing the prose of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — sustained argumentative writing that carries theory and evidence together, a self-contained abstract, disciplined length despite the absence of a hard cap, and full anonymization for double-anonymized review. Polishes prose; it does not run the submission preflight (aos-submission).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a company's published content to extract their brand voice, writing style, and tone guidelines. Reads 10-20 of their best content pieces and produces a brand voice profile covering tone, vocabulary level, sentence structure, formatting patterns, CTAs, and target persona. Useful before writing outreach, content, or campaigns that should match a client's existing voice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains the scenarios a LiveKit agent simulation runs, and wires the agent to consume them. Use when the user asks "what should I test", "generate simulation scenarios", "write scenarios for my agent", "add a scenario for X", "organize my scenario files", "my simulations are flaky", "the scenario hits my real database", "seed state per scenario", "it passed but booked the wrong thing", "grade the final state", or wants to stress-test a flow before shipping. Covers generating a baseline with the LiveKit scenario generator and refining it, writing the cases generation misses, phrasing simulated-user instructions so they steer reliably, splitting scenarios into sets across files, and the agent-side code that seeds deterministic state from a scenario and fails a run on its final state. To run them use running-livekit-simulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when writing or revising text, including responses, documentation, comments, emails, posts, reports, and messages, especially when the user asks to "humanize", "write naturally", "remove AI tone", or "avoid AI writing".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。