5,892 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Configure rate limiting, manage auth secrets, set up CSRF protection, define trusted origins, secure sessions and cookies, encrypt OAuth tokens, track IP addresses, and implement audit logging for Better Auth. Use when users need to secure their auth setup, prevent brute force attacks, or harden a Better Auth deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract the design of a screenshot, website URL or Figma file into a design.md with tokens, components, layout and brand rules, or copy one element (navbar, card, illustration) into an element.md with a rebuild or image-generation prompt. Use when the user wants to document, replicate, audit or reverse-engineer a visual design: its design system, palette, typography or style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit web interfaces against WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, identify violations, and produce actionable remediation reports with code fixes. Use when the user requests accessibility testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build evidence-oriented readiness checklists for frameworks such as SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and GDPR, with gaps and remediation priorities. Use when the user needs an internal readiness assessment or control-mapping plan; do not use it to certify compliance or replace an auditor or counsel.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect, profile, clean, reconcile, analyze, visualize, and verify spreadsheet data while preserving formulas, formatting, types, and source files. Use when working with .xlsx, .xlsm, .xls, .ods, .csv, or .tsv files; answering questions from a workbook; auditing formulas or data quality; comparing sheets or versions; producing pivots, charts, forecasts, or summary workbooks; repairing malformed tables; or validating that spreadsheet edits and calculations are accurate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design privacy-aware observability for AI agents using traces, spans, structured events, metrics, cost attribution, dashboards, alerts, and investigation workflows. Use when instrumenting an agent, debugging intermittent tool or model failures, defining service-level objectives, analyzing latency or spend, auditing agent decisions, or preparing production monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and verify auditable human oversight, approval gates, escalation paths, and safe state transitions for AI agent workflows. Use when deciding which agent actions require review, adding approve/reject or dual-control flows, preventing unauthorized autonomous effects, creating decision records, reducing rubber-stamping, or recovering safely from rejected, expired, or failed actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Computational Social Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computational Social Scientist judgment. Reasons from social mechanisms, measurement validity, and sampling frames through DAGs, fixed-effects and IV/DiD/RDD designs, ERGM/SAOM network models, and human-audited text classifiers while treating unobserved homophily, network interference and SUTVA violations, platform-driven selection, bot contamination, and digital-skew unrepresentativeness as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Audiologist. Use when a task calls for Audiologist judgment. Reasons from auditory transduction, site-of-lesion localization, audibility, and noise dose-response through calibrated pure-tone/masking audiometry, immittance, OAE and ABR/ASSR, and real-ear verification against NAL-NL2/DSL targets while treating unmasked cross-hearing, collapsed ear canals, transducer miscalibration, and non-organic loss as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A high-level conceptual mapping from Active Directory attack techniques to the compliance controls they touch. Kerberoasting relates to authentication and logging, so it brushes ENS op.acc.5 / op.exp.8, NIS2 Art.21(2)(h), DORA RTS Art.9 / Art.21. Use this when a reader wants to understand which regulatory control an AD finding relates to, or to add an orientation note to a technical finding. This is a conceptual, orientative mapping only; it is NOT an auditor-defensible, curated, ID-by-ID control matrix. Covers ENS (op.acc.*, op.exp.*), NIS2 (Directive 2022/2555 Art.21), and DORA (RTS 2024/1774).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-independent production workflow for agents assembling, auditing, executing, and handing off ComfyUI node-graph workflows for image, video, upscale, inpaint, conditioning, and batch media generation; use when a task involves ComfyUI workflow JSON/API graphs, model and custom-node inventories, reproducibility, provenance, safety/rights review, local or cloud execution hygiene, or production QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural thinking partner for an existing repository — scans the codebase, conducts a structured interview, agrees on current architectural state and recommended direction, and produces a shareable insights document. Scoped to one repository, module, or folder. Does not execute transformation — it orients. Use when the user says 'assess my codebase architecture', 'what direction should my codebase go', 'architecture compass', 'understand my architecture', 'audit architecture drift', 'architectural assessment', or 'help me understand what is wrong with my codebase'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit any Lattice SKILL.md for language compliance — removes rationale prose, converts soft language to imperatives, adds STOP: gates on hard rules, and cuts redundant repetition. Complements skill-review (which finds behavioral gaps) by fixing phrasing that causes agents to skip or underweight instructions at runtime. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'tighten this skill', 'clean up the language', 'make this more effective', 'reduce the bloat', 'tighten the language', or 'skill tighten'. Standalone — does not call other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research npm packages — download stats, dependencies, maintainers, version history, and security advisories. Useful for technology due diligence, dependency auditing, and evaluating package reliability before adoption.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviewer role. Opens rendered HTML, inspects every slide visually, fixes problems in custom.css or slides.html and rebuilds through build-html.sh. Use whenever the user says "review", "QA", "check slides", "inspect", "audit", "proofread", or wants feedback on a rendered deck.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security forensics for git repos, AI skills, and MCP servers. Audits dependencies, detects prompt injection, credential theft, runtime dynamism, manifest drift, known CVEs, CISA KEV (actively exploited) vulns, and 2026 attack patterns. Not for fixing vulnerabilities or pentesting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Internal — for Boundless team members only. Audit native ETH, market deposit, prover collateral, and distributor ZKC reserve balances for every operator-managed address (provers, distributor, order generators, signal). Use when the user wants to know which addresses need topping up, asks about the balance of provers/OGs/distributor/signal signers, says something is "running low" or "out of gas", or wants a periodic operational health check on operator wallets. Defaults to prod env (mainnets + prod testnets) — pass `--all` to also include staging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run outcome-focused Firecrawl workflows that produce deliverables such as research reports, literature reviews over published papers, SEO audits, QA reports, lead lists, knowledge bases, website design systems, and other structured web-data artifacts. Use when the user wants Firecrawl to complete a business, marketing, product, or creative workflow rather than merely scrape a page or integrate API calls into code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Block a sender so their messages are dropped before decryption (and the relay is told to refuse their resends); re-allow one with `--remove`, or list blocked senders with `--list`. Use to stop unwanted or abusive mail from a specific sender, undo a block, or audit your block list. If the sender is not specified, ask with AskUserQuestion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, auditing, scoring, or improving a real or synthetic MATLAB AI tutor transcript, tutoring prompt, generated lesson, exercise, feedback sequence, or skill behavior for MATLAB accuracy, active learning, assignment guardrails, feedback quality, debugging support, transfer prompts, and instructor-facing quality recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。