5,031 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Find scientific papers, follow citations, and verify claims against paper passages. Use for literature questions, related work, citing papers, references, or a question about a particular scientific paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a paper audited for integrity issues — image misuse, numerical anomalies, logical gaps — and needs a reviewable evidence report. Works on external papers (PDF / DOI / arXiv) and on outputs from a local paper-writer run. Single-stage skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate beautiful, high-resolution mindmaps from Markdown unordered lists. Outputs interactive HTML, HD PNG, and PDF with colorful branch themes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO keyword clustering with topic organization, content hub architecture, internal linking strategies. Use for content strategy, keyword research, pillar page structures, or encountering cluster organization, hub architecture, internal linking errors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, refine, compare, and when needed validate distinctive names for startups, AI products, developer tools, protocols, open-source projects, apps, product families, local businesses, services, companies, nonprofits, and other organizations. Use when asked to name or rename a business, brand, product, venture, shop, studio, or organization; derive a name from an existing project or concept; create a company and product naming system; compare candidates; or check company, domain, package, repository, marketplace, or trademark conflicts. Default to a fast no-browse creative pass; use current validation when the user requests availability or research, or is choosing a final name. Do not claim legal clearance, purchase domains, or present stale or unverified availability as fact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture, organize, and retrieve notes efficiently using structured formats, tagging, and file management for meetings, ideas, research, and daily logs. Use when the user requests note taking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and operate bounded multi-agent workflows with task decomposition, dependency graphs, ownership, handoff contracts, shared-state controls, approvals, recovery, and synthesis. Use when a task contains genuinely independent workstreams, specialized roles, parallel research or implementation, reviewer-worker loops, or coordination problems that one agent should not execute sequentially.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Dermatologist. Use when a task calls for Dermatologist judgment. Clinical-research dermatologist: layered skin anatomy, inflammatory dermatoses and trial endpoints, dermoscopy vs clinical ABCDE, biopsy/pathology, patch testing, telederm, AAD guidelines, and topical steroid potency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a 60–90 second, collage-style HyperFrames explainer from a hiding-in-plain-sight topic or supplied documents and links. Use for requests such as 'make a plain-sight explainer', 'Vox-style history of X', 'why is X everywhere?', or 'turn this document into an explainer'. Covers topic or source routing, research, script, static design approval, voiceover timing, motion continuity, build, and numeric quality gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Emit the content signals reimagine-it reads from an HTML file — title, anchors, proper nouns, dates, numbers, emails, links, source hex colors, and the derived palette — as JSON without generating a redesign. Use when the user says /reimagine-it extract, "what does the engine see in this page", "extract the palette", "pull the facts from this page", or wants content analysis for research, migration, or design-system work. CLI: npx reimagine-it extract -i page.html -o signals.json. Part of the reimagine-it Content-Derived Design suite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author the research plan — fundamentals first, trade ideas last; Constitution Check evaluated twice; Deviation Register with mandatory Expiry; emits the four side artifacts (brief/entities/reproduce/contracts). Technical (market_data_stage: early) theses MUST emit the entities.md bars schema before implement (Q42).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Append-only gap closure and the cadence engine for research theses. Evaluates artifact CURRENT state (never git history, never task checkboxes) against current pins and wrong_if falsifiers, then appends a Convergence section to tasks.md re-proposing the gaps. A clean run leaves tasks.md byte-identical. Deterministic gaps (stale, invalidated) are uncapped; judgment-class gaps are capped per spec 046 Q40.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute research tasks — checklist soft gate, phase dispatch with explicit thesis_dir, budget enforcement (halt + approval card on overrun), skill_pin recording (version_hash content-hashed per skill directory), [x] written on completion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial verification of research theses — cross-run/cross-thesis contradiction via the entity index, pre-mortem (Klarman/Kahneman: assume the loss already happened, reverse the path), inversion (Munger: invert, always invert), and wrong_if falsifiability review. ≈50-finding cap sorted by severity; content-derived finding IDs; incremental scoping with three backstops; lifecycle hooks at pillar-complete / thesis-complete / pre-reduction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a research thesis — theses/{nnn}-{slug}/ via mkdir-as-CAS, pillar-prioritized spec.md, initialized thesis.md, and the thesis-quality checklist. Refuses creation while the workspace constitution is unratified (spec 046 Q83 A+).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompose the plan into research tasks — one task per ticker × skill × mode, grouped by pillar, [P]-marked by the different-files-and-no-incomplete-deps rule, with source-refs. mode: all expands to N tasks at generation, never exists as one task (Q79).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The research-domain clarification skill — find underspecified items in a thesis spec.md (prose wrong_if, universe rows without rationale, missing budget/expiry/pins, ambiguous pillars), ask the human structured questions WITH options (max 5 per round), encode the answers back into spec.md's Clarifications section, and re-evaluate checklists/thesis-quality.md after every write (Q32 bidirectional maintenance).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and scope production work with Odyssey's real-time interactive video world models (odyssey.ml — Odyssey-1/Odyssey-2/Starchild-1/Agora-1). Use when a request involves generating video that a user steers live with keyboard, text, speech, or controller input (streamed frames that respond in the moment), or when someone must decide between Odyssey-style interactive generation and offline clip generators (Sora/Veo/Kling) or downloadable 3D / game engines. Covers what is verified versus announced, current access routes, latency and coherence limits, feasible-now versus speculative use cases, pricing/access terms, and content/rights considerations. This is a fast-moving research-stage product; the skill teaches honest scoping, not a promise of production reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-independent explainer video production for AI agents creating educational, product, concept, nonprofit/public-service, onboarding, training, animated, mixed-media, and short social explainers. Use when an agent must turn a topic, brief, research corpus, product, process, policy, dataset, or complex idea into a factual, accessible, narrated, captioned, storyboarded, generated-media-ready explainer video with claim review, localization, pacing, variants, and QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-independent workflow for AI agents producing documentary-style montages, archive-driven timelines, interview-supported sequences, nonprofit or advocacy shorts, historical explainers, and hybrid generated/archive edits. Use for editorial thesis development, research/source logs, fact-checking, archive rights, synthetic reenactment disclosure, chronology, interview selects, lower thirds, generated b-roll direction, music restraint, captions, sensitive subjects, review escalation, delivery variants, and documentary QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-independent production design direction for AI-generated media. Use when translating narrative, brand, advertising, product, social, film, or worldbuilding intent into sets, locations, props, color and material palettes, era research, graphic and environmental design, continuity bibles, image/video prompt planning, reference strategy, production constraints, iteration notes, handoff specs, and QA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。