「wants」の検索結果

Analyze an open-source project from What/Why perspective (not how-it's-implemented). Use when the user says "/analyze-oss", "분석해줘 이 오픈소스", "이 레포 뭐하는거야", "analyze this repo", "what does X do", "이거 왜 쓰는거야", "이 라이브러리 분석", provides a GitHub URL and wants understanding, or asks to deeply understand an OSS project's purpose, value, target users, and usage flow. Clones the repo to ~/opensource-analysis/<repo-name>/ (git pull if already exists), dispatches parallel subagents per analysis lens, then synthesizes a What/Why-focused report in chat. Supports optional user-specific follow-up questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hoyeon blueprint workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-blueprint" or wants to turn requirements.md into a validated plan.json and optional contracts.md. This adapter loads the canonical blueprint skill and follows its Codex runtime surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hoyeon requirements workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-specify" or wants to turn an unclear goal into structured requirements.md for Hoyeon. This adapter loads the canonical specify skill and follows its Codex runtime surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hoyeon execution workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-execute" or wants to execute a Hoyeon plan.json through the Bash-first Codex adapter. This adapter loads the canonical execute skill and follows its Codex runtime surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/tribunal", "tribunal", "review this", "3-way review", "risk-value-feasibility check", or wants multi-perspective adversarial review. Also triggered by: "트리뷰널", "리뷰 해줘", "3관점 리뷰", "위험성 검토". Runs 3 agents (Risk/Value/Feasibility) in parallel and synthesizes a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user says "/council", "council", "deliberate", "multi-perspective decision", "트레이드오프 분석", "위원회 소집", "여러 관점으로 검토", or wants deep multi-perspective deliberation with tradeoff mapping. Combines tribunal (structured adversarial review), agent-council (external LLM opinions), dev-scan (community sentiment), and step-back (meta-level review) into a unified decision-making committee. Uses Agent Teams for real peer-to-peer debate with iterative step-back moderation loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has positioning and wants a reusable Xiaohongshu topic/title bank instead of asking AI to freely brainstorm, especially to map topics to user needs such as emotional resonance, growth proof, new insight, learning value, or identity expression. Trigger phrases: "选题库", "标题公式", "每天发什么", "批量选题", "爆款需求", "XHS topic bank", "title formulas". Do not use before account positioning and target audience are known.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has an AI-generated Xiaohongshu draft and wants it to sound more personal, concrete, platform-appropriate, and stronger in hook, retention, and interaction value. Trigger phrases: "去 AI 味", "不像我", "合规检查", "改得像真人", "开头不抓人", "没停留", "humanize draft", "platform check". Do not use for initial positioning or topic generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a Xiaohongshu posting calendar, weekly review board, first-10-post launch plan, 10-20-post positioning test, or data-based next-step plan. Trigger phrases: "排期", "复盘", "30 天计划", "前10条", "10-20条测试", "发了没数据", "weekly review", "content calendar", "XHS schedule". Do not use for first-draft editing or initial account positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants WorkBuddy or another agent to remember an account's positioning, voice, boundaries, data, trust assets, personal IP story, and content rules across sessions. Trigger phrases: "账号档案", "记住我的账号", "写入记忆", "人设垂直", "信任名片", "brand profile", "account memory", "style guide". Do not use for one-off post drafting unless profile data is missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to start or reposition a Xiaohongshu account but is asking "what should I post" before clarifying monetization, timing, personal IP direction, or trust path. Trigger phrases: "小红书定位", "不知道做什么赛道", "怎么变现", "个人IP", "账号方向", "XHS positioning", "monetization first". Do not use for drafting a specific post; use topic or copy skills after positioning is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end content creation workflow that orchestrates research, editorial review, and social distribution agents in sequence. Use when the user wants to create, review, and distribute content through a multi-stage pipeline, or says "/content-pipeline".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured data markup (JSON-LD) for rich results, AI search visibility, and enhanced SERP features. Supports Article, FAQ, HowTo, Product, Review, LocalBusiness, Event, BreadcrumbList, Person, Organization, and more. Use when the user needs schema markup, structured data, rich snippets, JSON-LD, or wants to improve search appearance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DSPy is a Python framework from Stanford NLP that replaces hand-written prompts with code: you declare LLM tasks as typed signatures, compose them into modules, and let optimizers (BootstrapFewShot, MIPROv2, GEPA) tune the prompts and few-shot examples against your metric. Use when the user asks about DSPy, signatures, ChainOfThought, ReAct, teleprompters or optimizers, or wants to stop hand-tuning prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage secrets and environment variables using the Doppler CLI. Use when the user wants to set up Doppler, inject secrets into processes, manage projects and configs, upload or download secrets, create service tokens, use secret templates, or integrate Doppler with Docker, Kubernetes, or CI/CD pipelines. Trigger words: doppler, secrets manager, env vars, secret injection, doppler run, doppler setup, service token, secret rotation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Excalibur.js is a TypeScript-first 2D game engine for the browser with actors, scenes, collision physics, animation, sound, input and a Tiled map plugin. Use when the user wants to build or debug a browser game with Excalibur, load Tiled maps, animate sprite sheets, handle keyboard or pointer input, or manage scenes and cameras.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CrewAI is a Python framework for building multi-agent AI systems: you define agents with roles, goals and tools, give them tasks, and run them as a crew with sequential or hierarchical processes, memory and delegation. Use when a user wants to build a multi-agent workflow, set up a CrewAI project, write custom CrewAI tools, or run a crew from the crewai CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detox is a gray-box end-to-end testing framework for React Native apps: it runs Jest tests against the app on an iOS simulator or Android emulator and waits for the app to go idle before each step. Use when the user wants to set up Detox, write or fix React Native E2E tests, debug a test that hangs or cannot find an element, or run Detox in CI. Also use when the user mentions "detox," "React Native E2E," "gray-box testing," "detox build," or "Wix Detox." For black-box testing of any mobile app, see appium; for simple YAML UI flows, see maestro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cucumber runs behavior-driven (BDD) tests written as plain-language Gherkin feature files and matches each Given/When/Then step to code. Use when the user wants to write feature files, implement step definitions in JavaScript or TypeScript with cucumber-js, share state through a World, add hooks, tags and profiles, or run BDD scenarios in CI. Also use when the user mentions "cucumber," "BDD," "Gherkin," "feature files," "given-when-then," "step definitions," or "behavior-driven." For contract testing, see pact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chromatic is a visual testing service from the Storybook team that snapshots every story in a cloud browser and shows visual diffs for review on each pull request. Use when the user wants visual regression testing with Storybook, or mentions "chromatic," "visual regression," "Storybook testing," "UI review," "visual diff," or "component snapshot testing." For general screenshot comparison, see percy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, researches and writes comparison pages: "[rival] alternatives", "[product] vs [rival]", "[rival A] vs [rival B]" and switching guides. Builds each page from a ledger of sourced, dated facts and ends with an honest verdict on who should choose which product. Use when someone asks for an "alternative page", a "vs page", a "competitor comparison", "comparison landing pages", "why us instead of them", or wants existing comparison pages checked for outdated prices and claims that cannot be backed up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a content strategy a small team can execute: audience needs backed by counted evidence, an audit of what is already published, a topic map with one page per search intent, a scored backlog, a 90-day calendar sized to real capacity, and the numbers that will show whether it worked. Use when someone asks "what should we write about", "plan our blog", "content strategy", "content plan for next quarter", "topic clusters", "content audit", "our blog traffic is falling", or wants a pile of content ideas turned into a prioritised plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides a founder from real decisions to a short set of written company values that people can act on: collects incidents, tests each candidate value, writes it as a trade-off with behaviors and a story, and wires it into hiring, feedback and promotion. Use when someone asks to "define our company values", "write a values document", "our values are generic, fix them", "turn our values into interview questions", "what should our culture be before we hire", or wants to check whether the team lives the values it has. Produces VALUES.md, an evidence log and an interview kit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。