「clo」の検索結果

AI 浏览器自动化工具，基于 CDP 协议。需要控制浏览器、页面导航、点击元素、填写表单、提取内容或截图时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert sales negotiation strategist for B2B deal-making. Use when planning negotiation strategy, handling discount requests, closing deals, navigating procurement, or structuring win-win agreements. Covers anchoring, framing, BATNA development, multi-party negotiations, and contract terms. Use for enterprise deals, pricing discussions, and high-stakes negotiations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply fail-closed consent, scope, undo, and verification rules to TouchDesigner mutations made with tdmcp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the ENTIRE tdmcp roadmap-to-1.0 to completion as a resumable, wave-by-wave campaign — Milestone 4 (generative-AI bridge wave), Milestone 5 (mixer scene arming), and the v1.0 consolidation gates G1–G6 — routing each class of work to the right existing sub-harness. Use whenever the user wants to "implement everything / all the milestones / the whole roadmap / finish the road to 1.0", run the next milestone, close the consolidation gates, or build a long autonomous campaign across M4/M5/G1–G6. ALSO use for every follow-up: continue/resume the roadmap campaign, run the next wave, re-run a failed wave, fold in QA results, check campaign status, re-prioritize, or scope to one milestone/gate. This is the CAMPAIGN layer ABOVE tdmcp-pipeline / tdmcp-feature-lead / tdmcp-backlog-campaign — it sequences across MULTIPLE sub-harnesses (tools, mixer, coverage, docs, bridge, recipes, submission), which the generic backlog-campaign does not. For a SINGLE feature use tdmcp-pipeline; for one tool-shaped backlog file use tdmcp-backlog-campaign. Simple questions can be answered directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shell and session operations after an attack module already established command execution, a raw shell, webshell channel, container/runner shell, or remote session. This module does not own exploitation and should not pull SSH/WinRM/RDP authentication or vulnerability-to-shell chains out of Web/AD/Cloud/K8s/CI-CD/Service/Phishing. Use it to bootstrap a usable callback from existing command execution, stabilize Linux PTY, upgrade Windows sessions with ConPTY where applicable, manage listeners, recover fragile sessions, and exchange files for continued operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Credential operations: secret discovery, classification, extraction, conversion, offline cracking of hashes the operator already has as a credential job, policy-aware spraying, NetNTLM capture, generic SMB relay, and Windows/Linux harvest. Do not hijack an in-progress /ad-attack Kerberoast/AS-REP chain (that module cracks and uses the ticket itself). Do not DCSync, read LAPS LDAP, or escalate cloud IAM. Usable credentials are recorded; the operator chooses the next module.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Endpoint defense evasion after an operator-selected chain already has a valid execution path but AV/EDR/AMSI/WDAC/PPL/memory/kernel telemetry blocks the intended action. Originating modules include /web-attack /ad-attack /cloud-attack /k8s /cicd /service-attack /phishing /privesc-win /privesc-linux /creds /post /shell. Success is the blocked action becoming executable, then resume the originating module — not obtaining a shell here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OS post-exploitation after a stable host foothold: quiet host recon, host-native persistence (Windows Run/tasks/services/COM/WMI and Linux SSH/cron/systemd/SUID), long-term C2 (Sliver primary, Mythic/Havoc optional), targeted collection and exfil, and engagement cleanup. Does not own AD/cloud/K8s native persistence, Ligolo pivoting, LSASS dumping, or EDR bypass. Operator selects objectives; success is a live callback, verified persistence, delivered loot, or restored host — not generating an unused implant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从 MAS（clock_domains / io_timing / path_exceptions）派生 Synopsys SDC 时序约束文件，OpenSTA 语法校验。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis 综合前；(2) post-PD timing fail 修订约束；(3) 显式 /bb-create-sdc。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在 wiki/cbb/ 搜索可复用 Common Building Block（sync-fifo / 2ff-sync / clock-gate 等），返回匹配模板路径。bba-architect 在 MAS 中识别复用组件时调用。触发场景：(1) bba-architect 拆分子模块识别 CBB；(2) 显式 /bb-search-cbb。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从 MAS（io_ring/pad_list/clock_plan）+ 综合网表生成 Magic floorplan TCL，交给 bb-invoke-magic 执行。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-pd 综合后做 floorplan；(2) DRC 失败后调整 utilization 重生成；(3) 显式 /bb-create-floorplan。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

基于 AST 检查 CDC/RDC 违例：对比 MAS clock_domains 找跨域信号，检查是否被 2ff-sync CBB 保护。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis 综合前；(2) 显式 /bb-check-cdc。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use on Day 1 of an AIS-OS install, when someone says "set me up", "onboard me", "let's get started", "fill in my AIOS", or has just cloned the kit. Combined wizard — runs the 7-question intake AND scaffolds the Day-1 file set at the end. Idempotent — re-run any time after editing aios-intake.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style hydrology manuscript reviewer skill for testing streamflow, runoff, groundwater, water storage, drought, flood, hydroclimate and water-resource claims against water-balance closure, hydrologic signatures, model structure and observational constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style atmospheric science manuscript reviewer skill for testing observation, reanalysis, model, aerosol-cloud-radiation, extreme-event, circulation-mechanism and attribution claims against their physical evidence chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a rifle-scope reticle from a plain-language description and emit it as a BallisticCalculator `.reticle` file (BXml) plus a rendered SVG preview. Covers the complete `.reticle` element/attribute specification, reticle design principles (mrad vs MOA subtension, FFP/SFP, stroke-weight hierarchy, hash-mark ladders, christmas-tree wind holds, clutter budget, BDC anchors) and worked, verified patterns for duplex, mil-dot, hash-ladder, christmas-tree, chevron, circle-dot, dense-grid and rangefinding-stadia reticles. Also covers reproducing an existing commercial reticle from its manufacturer's technical data sheet. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, modify, review or render a scope reticle, crosshair, mil-dot / MOA grid, holdover ladder, christmas tree, BDC ladder or rangefinding stadia — including any mention of a `.reticle` file, `ReticleDefinition`, `ReticleDrawController`, `SvgCanvasFactory`, or "draw me a reticle", and including requests to clone or model a named commercial reticle (Horus H58/H59, TReMoR, Mil-C, MOAR, Tremor3, EBR, and the like). Trigger it even when the user only says something like "make a crosshair with 0.2 mil hashes out to 5 mils" or "turn this reticle picture into a file", and trigger it before hand-writing reticle XML or hand-rolling reticle geometry, because the file format silently ignores misspelled attributes and mis-cased booleans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when navigating or refactoring code with a language server - choosing between semantic (LSP), exact-text (rg), and fuzzy/semantic search; anchoring LSP calls by position; gating degraded results; and disclosing tool substitutions, in any language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive this project's own integration conventions from what the code already does, draft them as a wiring contract, and hold new work to it. Closes the built-but-not-wired gap at L3 (walking skeleton) — a mechanism that ships and is never called reads green in every other check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render `.claude/diamonds/active.yml` as the decisions each diamond has recorded, in order, grouped by mode (discovery, delivery). Read-only. Default format Mermaid stateDiagram-v2, drawn by a script. Recommended at the end of `/mycelium:diamond-assess` so every assessment closes with a visual state-of-play. See `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/engine/render-conventions.md` for shared render fleet conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use SonarJS-derived rules in .NET repositories that ship JavaScript or TypeScript frontends and need deeper bug-risk, code-smell, or cognitive-complexity checks than a minimal ESLint baseline. Use when the repo wants `eslint-plugin-sonarjs` locally or already runs SonarQube or SonarCloud in CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, moving or auditing any .md in imp - deciding which file a paragraph belongs in, adding a doc, fixing a stale claim, or when docs_lint.py fails in CI. Covers the four reader layers (L0 README / L1 operators / L2 kernel devs / L3 agents), the HTML-comment metadata header, [PROV:] provenance, the single-source-of-truth map, generated perf blocks, which numbers may appear in prose, plan-doc closure. Triggers on "which doc does this go in", "docs lint failed", "add a doc", "this claim is stale", "update the README", "PROV block", "layer", "STALE.md". Do NOT use for the CHANGELOG or a release body (shipping-prs), or for code-comment accuracy (codebase-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes intraday volatility dynamics with open/close effects, lunch-time patterns, and event-driven volatility estimation. Use when modeling intraday volatility, timing order execution, or analyzing time-of-day effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。