Review the product engineer's post-implementation testing notes for how thoroughly they cover the card's requirements and risk, and whether regression-worthy cases are automated at the right level of the test hierarchy
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,006 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review the product engineer's post-implementation testing notes for how thoroughly they cover the card's requirements and risk, and whether regression-worthy cases are automated at the right level of the test hierarchy
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
使用状态绑定的最小 Tool Surface、exact Action Gateway、来源可追踪的 MissionSpec 与 Verification Manifest、宿主无关 Flight Progression Engine、可选且无权威的 App Server continuation、顺序持久 Wave、一层原生 Agent、困难后强制战术指导、证据型 Capability Profile、显式 Manual Verification、不可变宿主 Evidence、恢复检查点和仅本地 Git,治理复杂 Codex 开发。用户要求飞控接管、继续、自主开发、修复或完成多步骤软件项目,需要有界并行子代理,或实现前必须建立文档工程时使用。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record the statements a journal requires and a reader checks — authors with their CRediT contributions, ethics approval that names the body and the reference number, how consent was taken, funding with grant numbers, conflicts of interest, data availability with an address or a reason, and the use of generative AI — as a validated record that the submission folder prints and the manuscript never carries. Use when a run is heading for submission, when an author asks who should be listed, when consent, approval or data sharing has to be stated, or when the venue's AI policy comes up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Meta-skill for complete Roblox game development with Rojo — the entry point that knows and unifies the three specialist skills `/rojo` (filesystem→Studio sync, project setup), `/rbx-studio` (editor, MCP, assets, malware scan) and `/game-design` (roles, workflows, GDD). Use this skill for ANY Roblox game-dev undertaking: planning/building/setting up a Roblox game, scaffolding a new project, defining code architecture (Main + manager modules, _G.ClientState + HUD, remotes in GameEnums), avoiding Luau/Roblox pitfalls, or when it is unclear which of the Roblox specialist skills fits — routing happens from here. Also trigger on "develop Roblox game", "build Roblox game", "new Roblox project", "Luau project structure", "how do I organize Roblox code", "Roblox dev setup".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs a pre-launch evaluation plan for a declarative agent from its instructions text, skills, capabilities, knowledge sources and sample requests: a behaviour contract of testable statements quoted from the text, test prompts by scenario family and tier with setup, expected behaviour, pass and fail criteria and red flags, a red-flag catalogue, a blank scoring sheet, a coverage table and a go or no-go checklist the owner completes and decides. Use when the user asks to "write test cases for my agent", "how do I evaluate this agent before launch", "build a test plan for the agent", "what should I check before publishing this agent" or "give me a go no-go checklist". Do not use for finding injection or leakage exposures in the instructions, use agent-instructions-red-team instead; do not use for reviewing one SKILL.md, use skill-file-reviewer instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads two or more supplier, bid or tender responses against a requirements list and returns a DRAFT comparison pack: a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps per supplier, clarification questions and neutral observations, for an evaluation panel. Never scores, weights, ranks or recommends a winner; the award stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to "compare these bids", "matrix the tender responses against our requirements", "collate the RFQ replies", "show me where each supplier falls short" or "draft clarification questions for the bidders". Do not use for scoring or weighting against agreed criteria, use supplier-evaluation-matrix instead, or for writing the requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write, compile, load, debug and re-use SuperCollider SynthDefs with sc_synthdef - the unit of sound design in SuperCollider. Covers Out and ReplaceOut, argument naming, envelopes and doneAction, why a def must be loaded on a specific server before /s_new works, and how to read the compiler's error rather than guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the answer in the SuperCollider documentation that ships with the install instead of guessing - what sc_help's search, answer, class and index actions return, what the .schelp tree looks like (over a thousand files: Classes, Guides, Reference, Overviews), how to read a class page for its argument names, and where the server's OSC commands are written down.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality gate immediately after building: prove that what was just built actually works, while the context is still hot. Six steps: scope what changed, run live on real data, break it on purpose, show a counter or log proving it ran, root-cause any failure and re-run, then a verdict with evidence. Only a green verdict earns the word done. Supports an external multi-vendor review panel as a mid-step. Triggers: "/tt", "/test", "prove it works", "test what we built".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect missing validation plans (how to verify the design is correct) in design documents and ADRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migration, or when no narrower playbook applies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and analyze Estuary task logs with jq filtering. Use when investigating task failures, debugging connector errors, analyzing behavior patterns, or streaming live logs. Use when user says "check logs", "show me logs", "task failing", "why is my capture failing", "why is my materialization failing", "error messages", "why did it fail", "search task logs", "shard failed", "follow logs", "increase log level", "debug logging", "is this log message normal", "what does this message mean", "connection timeout", or "i/o timeout".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate and schedule quarterly estimated tax payments (Form 1040-ES) for self-employed individuals. Covers self-employment tax calculation (15.3%), income tax estimation, safe harbor rules (100%/110% of prior year), payment deadlines, and underpayment penalties. Trigger on "estimated taxes", "quarterly taxes", "1040-ES", "how much should I pay quarterly", "self-employment tax", "avoid tax penalty".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write operator-facing and public documentation plans for AI-Controlled Party mixer/Soundcraft Ui24R scene arming. Use for runbooks, rehearsal checklists, show-day checklists, EN/PT docs updates, demo scripts, safety wording, and follow-up documentation revisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to see what learned instincts exist, their confidence scores and how current they are — reads the local instincts file under ~/.aos/instincts/ and reports it. Read-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to run and test the docs/index.html AGSL shader web gallery locally (static server, WebGL2-capable Chrome flags, CDP verification hooks).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Aws Pricing — aWS pricing helper for cost queries. ALWAYS use get_aws_cost script for pricing questions. Use when: - User asks about AWS resource costs or pricing - User wants to compare pricing across regions - User needs spot, on-demand, or reserved pricing info Triggers: aws pricing, aws cost, how much does, ec2 price, rds cost, s3 pricing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Navigating Sparse Evidence: Agentic Visual RAG via Explicit Context Selection and Consolidation Soochow University ; Baidu Inc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1. **Deconstruct the User's Query**: * Core subject 1: Energy efficiency (in computing/AI).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hierarchical, Hybrid, and Omnimodal Models Jun 30 58 m Jun 30, 2026 58 m read Show 10 25 50 100 pe GAP: no mappable capability in latest signal (our t
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cold start — every GPU, every model size GPU Model ZSE vLLM Speedup NVIDIA T4 (16 GB) Qwen2.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite mobile app image-generation skill for creating premium, app-native screen concepts and flows. Designed for iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile products. Prioritizes clean hierarchy, comfortably readable text, strong multi-screen consistency, controlled color palettes, non-generic creative direction, textured surfaces, image-led composition, tasteful custom iconography, and clean phone mockup framing. By default, screens should be shown inside a subtle premium iPhone or similar phone mockup with a visible frame, while the main focus stays on the app content itself. This skill generates images only. It does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an expert software engineer and systems analyst. Use when user asks "how does X work" with expectation of depth, user wants to understand a complex system spanning many files, or user asks for architectural analysis or pattern investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。