「security」の検索結果

Compares one policy against one requirement set (standard, regulation, contract schedule or customer requirement) clause by clause and returns a draft gap review: each requirement element, the policy clause that appears to address it, an apparent match state, and every gap as a question with the clause reference on both sides. Never concludes that the policy complies; the owner decides. Use when the user asks to "gap our policy against the standard", "map this policy to the regulation clause by clause", "check the security policy against the customer's contract schedule", "compare our policy with the new edition" or "where does our policy fall short of the requirements". Do not use for mapping a requirement to the operating controls that implement it, use controls-gap-pack instead; for what a regulatory change means for the organisation, use regulatory-change-impact-note. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an evidence map for one document, section or contested claim: every factual claim extracted verbatim and numbered, its supporting passage in the supplied sources or UNKNOWN, the strength of that support as evidenced, contradictions between sources, and the specific question or document that would close each gap, returned in the chat as Markdown tables for the author or reviewer. Use when the user asks to "check what this document actually proves", "map the evidence behind these claims", "which of these statements are supported", "build an evidence map", "what would we need to back this up" or "is this claim substantiated". Do not use for requesting evidence of security controls from control owners, use control-evidence-request-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads one export transaction, order or shipment description and returns a DRAFT export review pack: parties to screen with a screening checklist, an item classification worksheet, a red-flag review, licence-determination questions and open items. Use when the user asks to "prepare the export review for this order", "pre-check this shipment for export control", "who do we need to screen on this deal", "build the classification worksheet for this item" or "assemble the trade-compliance file for this technology transfer". Do not use for vendor security or due-diligence screening of a supplier's questionnaire answers; use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead. Never classifies, screens, clears, decides licence need or releases a shipment; trade compliance does. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews one employee software request (tool, purpose, users, data handled, cost, urgency) against the approved-tools list and the policies the user provides and returns a draft review for the reviewer: match state on the list with the row quoted, approved tools the list itself describes as covering the same need, policy clauses that bear on the request with quoted text, questions for the requester and the reviewer, and one suggested decision with its basis. Never approves, procures, installs or adds a tool to the list. Use when the user asks to "review this software request", "is this tool on the approved list", "check this request against our software policy", "do we already have something approved that does this" or "prepare the decision note for this tool request". Do not use for a full vendor security assessment, use vendor-risk-screening-brief instead; for sorting mixed requests, use request-intake-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or vendor contract in character as a Head of Procurement archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, commercial risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "review this from a procurement angle", "what would procurement say about this proposal", "pressure-test this vendor contract commercially", "find the holes before the sourcing committee" or "check the renewal terms like a Head of Procurement would". Do not use for liability, IP, regulatory or signing-authority questions, use general-counsel-reviewer instead; for whether the spend fits the budget, use cfo-reviewer; for vendor security, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, plan or contract summary in character as a General Counsel archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, legal risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Meeting preparation, not legal advice. Use when the user asks to "run a general counsel review", "what would legal say about this", "pressure-test the legal exposure in this deal" or "prepare me for the deal committee". Do not use for price, term, renewal or vendor leverage, use procurement-reviewer instead; for lawful basis and data flows, use cdo-reviewer; for security controls, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and review API contract tests across providers and consumers. Use for schema changes, compatibility regressions and client integration failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search indexed YouTube and podcast transcripts for quotes, speakers and clip boundaries with timestamped source links using Arcmira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install and use the official AI Headshot Generator package, pinned by digest, for paid hosted work on the Beatra service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run assay on a web page you just wrote or changed. It opens the page in a real browser, drives every control, and reports where the page contradicts itself. Deterministic, no API key, no network.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask real executives and domain experts a question through Instant Expert for a written answer or short call: practitioner knowledge, customer discovery. Free test mode; live sends need approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find animation and video references on 1human, consult a human-agent shared library, and contribute public creations only with prior owner permission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous AI security pen testing. Executes real exploits against web applications to find SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, authentication flaws, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Reports only confirmed, reproducible findings — no false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect and manage Elementor MCP servers as "MCP Apps" on NV oOS assistants — official Elementor MCP (application passwords, permission inheritance, enable/revoke flows), third-party Elementor MCP plugins, the Pro MCP Apps metabox/slash-command/REST surfaces, the Remote Sites "MCP Server" connection type with assistant connection_ref references, auth-type mapping (basic vs header vs oauth), the host allowlist (Security Center setting, constant, filter), tool discovery/bridging into chat, and troubleshooting (allowlist 403s, restricted hosts, protocol fallback, negative discovery cache, same-site in-process bridge, missing connection_ref). Use when connecting an assistant to Elementor MCP, creating a Remote Sites MCP Server connection, using /mcp-app, fixing Test Connection or Discover Tools failures, allowlisting an Elementor host, or debugging bridged elementor_* tools missing from chat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect factory health, stale work, CI, security advisories, and recent run evidence without implementing fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scheduled health sweep that closes the factory loop - reads CI failures, recent commits, dependency and security advisories, and live queue labels, then files issues and writes an immutable run record. Use for the nightly or weekly monitor routine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Atlas Cloud images and videos through its asynchronous media API with schema-first model selection and credential-safe polling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-integrity skill. Use for backend/API/persistence, preserve/do-not-change, tests/validation, mocks, rework, multi-part requests. Emits Goal Contracts, Deviation Notices, Phase Checks, Final Audits

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, run, and manage OCI/Linux containers as lightweight per-container VMs on Apple-silicon macOS using Apple's open-source container CLI, no Docker daemon required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement GitOps with ArgoCD for declarative Kubernetes deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semantic + keyword search and connection-discovery across the user's own Apple Notes via the apple-notes MCP server. Use when the user wants to find, recall, or synthesize something from their notes,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates production-grade Appium mobile automation scripts for Android and iOS in Java, Python, or JavaScript. Supports real device and emulator testing locally and on TestMu AI cloud with 100+ real

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。