「what」の検索結果

Analyze flow metrics to identify delivery bottlenecks and improve throughput. Use when the user says "flow metrics", "why is delivery slow", "cycle time analysis", "WIP analysis", "throughput review", "what's our lead time", "DORA metrics", "where is work getting stuck", "Kanban metrics", or wants to diagnose delivery performance using data - even if they don't explicitly say "flow metrics review". Based on "Making Work Visible" by Dominica DeGrandis (WIP limits, flow blockers, time thieves) and "Accelerate" by Forsgren, Humble & Kim (DORA metrics, delivery performance indicators).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a structured weekly or bi-weekly program status report for stakeholders. Use when the user says "write a status report", "program update", "stakeholder update", "weekly status", "RAG status", "program health report", "what do I send to leadership", "write the update for [program]", or needs to communicate delivery progress - even if they don't explicitly say "status report". Produces a concise, scannable report with RAG status, blockers, and decisions needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write press releases for product launches, funding announcements, partnerships, executive hires, and milestones using the Inverted Pyramid (AP journalism) and Ogilvy on Headlines (David Ogilvy, Ogilvy on Advertising). The lede answers Who/What/When/Where/Why in 40 words or fewer. The headline selects the right audience and promises a specific benefit. Use when the user asks for a press release, media release, news announcement, PR for X, launch announcement, funding announcement, or "write a press release". Reads brand voice and positioning from knowledge/. For pitching it to a journalist, see pr-pitch-writer. For the customer story behind it, see case-study-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Opportunity Solution Trees using Teresa Torres' framework for structured product discovery. Use this skill when: - You need to map a desired outcome to opportunities, solutions, and experiments - You want to decide WHAT to build next based on user research and discovery data - You have workshop findings, pilot feedback, or user research to structure into actionable options - You need a visual tree diagram showing the path from outcome to testable experiments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Allocate testing effort based on risk and failure likelihood using Google's SET/SWE/TE model. Use when user says "risk-based testing", "where should I focus testing", "test coverage strategy", "prioritize what to test", "high risk areas", or needs to decide how to distribute QA effort across a codebase - even if they don't explicitly say "risk-based".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a monthly content calendar across channels using the Content Marketing Matrix (Dave Chaffey, Smart Insights) - Entertain/Inspire/Educate/Convince. Every post gets a quadrant label. The monthly calendar must hit 40% Educate, 40% Inspire+Convince, 20% Entertain. Produces a week-by-week posting schedule with topics, formats, channels, and asset links. Use when the user says "content calendar", "social calendar", "plan next month's content", "what should we post", "content plan", "editorial calendar", "schedule posts for the month", or wants a structured posting plan for LinkedIn, Twitter, email, or blog. Reads brand voice, ICP, and past learnings from knowledge/. For writing the individual posts, see linkedin-post, newsletter-writer or content-writer. For the campaign this sits inside, see campaign-brief. For the end-of-month review, see retro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize a feature backlog or list of ideas. Use when the user says "help me prioritize", "prioritize this backlog", "RICE score these", "MoSCoW", "opportunity solution tree", "what should we build first", "rank these features", or has a list of items and needs to decide order - even if they don't explicitly say "prioritization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rate any product, feature, or experience on the 11-star scale (Brian Chesky's Airbnb thought experiment). Use when user says "rate this experience", "11-star", "star rating", "experience audit", "how good is this", "experience rating", "product audit", "quality assessment", or wants to evaluate product quality and identify improvement paths. Also trigger when user wants to benchmark a feature, assess where a product stands, or map out what "great" looks like - even if they don't explicitly say "11-star".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, score, and mitigate delivery risks for a program or release. Use when the user says "risk review", "what could go wrong", "risk register", "delivery risks for this release", "program risk assessment", "identify blockers before they hit", or wants to pressure-test a plan before committing - even if they don't say "risk review". Based on "The Phoenix Project" by Kim, Behr & Spafford (unplanned work, fragile systems, single points of failure) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (scoping risk, milestone pressure, hidden assumptions).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build QA quality dashboards, calculate defect metrics, analyze escape rates, and produce quality trend reports. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to measure and communicate quality outcomes. Trigger on phrases like "quality metrics", "defect density", "escape rate", "bug trends", "quality dashboard", "sprint quality report", "test coverage metrics", "QA KPIs", "how is quality trending", "defect leakage", "production bugs this quarter", "mean time to detect", "quality scorecard", or any request to quantify, visualize, or report on the quality of a product or testing process. Also trigger when a manager asks "how is QA performing?" or an engineering lead asks "what does our defect data tell us?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture learnings from a campaign, launch, sprint, or initiative using Five Whys (Taiichi Ohno, Toyota Production System) for root cause analysis and Start-Stop-Continue for action planning. Append reusable insights to knowledge/learnings.md so future runs of the OS get smarter. Use when the user asks for a retro, retrospective, post-mortem, "what did we learn", "campaign wrap-up", "lessons learned", or after a campaign or launch ends. Critical feedback loop that makes the OS compound over time. For the numbers review itself, see kpi-review. For planning the next campaign, see campaign-brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO-optimized long-form articles targeting specific keywords using the They Ask You Answer Big 5 framework (Marcus Sheridan). Articles are categorized by Big 5 type (Cost, Problems, Versus, Best/Reviews, How-To) and structured accordingly. The "answer first" rule applies to every article. Use when the user asks for an SEO article, blog post for ranking, "rank for keyword X", organic content, search-optimized post, pillar page, or content for organic traffic. Includes keyword targeting, search intent matching, internal linking suggestions, and meta tags. For improving an existing article, see copy-review. For deciding what to write about, see social-calendar pillars and icp-research. For repurposing it, see content-repurposer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate weekly or monthly status updates from local PM data. Use this skill when: - It's end of week and you need a status update for leadership or stakeholders - You need a monthly executive summary - You want to draft an email update using data from meetings, tracker tickets, and decisions - The user says "weekly update", "status report", "what happened this week?", "weekly summary" - The user says "Friday update", "send status email", "EOW update" Pulls from work logs, meetings, ticket tracker, and decisions — no manual input needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "write my investor update", "monthly update for investors", "quarterly investor email", "investor communication", "LP update", "board update", "shareholder update", "what do I tell my investors this month", "how do I write a good investor update", or wants to communicate progress, metrics, and needs to existing investors or board members on a recurring basis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a brand messaging framework or messaging hierarchy. Use when the user says "messaging framework", "brand messaging", "what should our tagline be", "clarify our messaging", "StoryBrand", "brand script", "our website copy is confusing", "we need a messaging hierarchy", "homepage messaging", "value prop copy", or wants to create consistent, clear messaging that converts visitors into customers. For the underlying positioning, see positioning-doc. For applying the message to a page, see landing-page-writer. For checking live copy against it, see copy-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Navigate a new leadership role using Michael Watkins' First 90 Days 30/60/90 framework. Use when someone says "I just started a new role", "I'm starting as a new manager", "I joined a new company as a leader", "I was just promoted", "how do I onboard as a leader", "what should I do in my first 30 days", "I inherited a team", "I need a 90 day plan", or "I'm new to this team". Also trigger when someone describes feeling overwhelmed in a new leadership role, unsure where to start, or tempted to make changes too quickly before they've listened. Applies to first-time managers, leaders joining new companies, and leaders moving into new functions or teams within the same company.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says "map out our business model", "business model canvas", "how does our business work", "what are our key resources", "define our value proposition", "revenue model design", "cost structure", "who are our key partners", "lean canvas", "business model design", "how do we make money", or wants to document, stress-test, or redesign how [your startup] creates, delivers, and captures value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Critique a design for usability, hierarchy, and accessibility. Use when the user says "critique this design", "review this screen", "what's wrong with this UI", "design feedback", "UX review", "how can I improve this", "review my mockup", "is this good UX", or shares a design and wants structured feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "design critique".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a clear pull request description. Use when the user says "write a PR description", "PR template", "pull request description", "how do I describe this change", "commit message for this", "document this change", "open a PR for", or is about to merge code and needs to communicate what changed and why - even if they don't explicitly say "PR description".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, bugs, and design issues. Use when the user says "review this code", "do a code review", "check this PR", "review this diff", "is this code good", "what's wrong with this code", "code quality check", or pastes code and wants feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "code review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a user flow for friction and drop-off points. Use when the user says "UX audit", "audit this flow", "where are users dropping off", "why isn't this converting", "review the onboarding", "usability audit", "what's causing friction", "user journey review", or wants to identify why users struggle with a flow - even if they don't explicitly say "UX audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and improve marketing copy that already exists - a page, an email, an ad, a post, a deck slide - using a fixed six-pass edit. Produces a marked-up diagnosis, a rewritten version, and a per-pass score so the user can see what changed and why. Use when the user says "review this copy", "improve this", "make this better", "tighten this", "edit this page", "does this copy work", "why is this flat", "punch this up", "proofread", or pastes existing copy and asks for feedback. Also use when copy is on-brand but underperforming. For writing new copy from nothing, see content-writer or landing-page-writer. For diagnosing a page's conversion problem beyond its words, see page-cro. For voice consistency rules, see brand-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, score, and shortlist brand names through a guided interview. Use when the user says "name my brand", "help me name", "come up with a name", "naming ideas", "what should I call this", "brand name", "product name", "company name", "rename", "rebrand", or is stuck choosing between names. Self-contained and brand-agnostic: it does not read knowledge/, so it works for naming a brand-new venture, product, service, feature, or rebrand from scratch, before any brand context exists. Runs on Alexandra Watkins' SMILE and SCRATCH tests to generate and filter, Marty Neumeier's 7 criteria to score, and the Lexicon Branding method for sound symbolism and strategy. Asks the user questions before generating. For the positioning the name has to carry, see positioning-doc. For the message architecture built on top of it, see messaging-framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose why a landing page, homepage, pricing page, or signup form is not converting, and produce a ranked fix list with a test plan. Runs a structured audit across motivation, value clarity, friction, anxiety, and CTA hierarchy rather than giving generic design opinions. Use when the user says "why isn't this page converting", "improve our conversion rate", "CRO", "conversion audit", "this page isn't working", "high traffic low signups", "people bounce", "review our landing page", or shares a URL and asks what is wrong with it. For rewriting the words only, see copy-review. For writing a new page from scratch, see landing-page-writer. For the statistics of running the test afterwards, see growth-experiment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。