「gate」の検索結果

Build and maintain CI/CD pipelines, containerization, Kubernetes manifests, and quality gates for this repository. Use when the user asks for Docker, Kubernetes, GitHub Actions/Azure DevOps pipelines, deployment, reliability, or static analysis workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, testing or previewing site-os — the BUILD_TARGET=stable dist directory, the four verification gates (build, test, env:check, brand:check), the preview servers on :3000 and :3100, and the failure modes that look like bugs but are not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and prevents code injection attacks targeting serverless functions (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions) through event source poisoning, malicious layer injection, runtime command execution, and IAM privilege escalation via function modification. The analyst combines static analysis of function code, CloudTrail event correlation, runtime behavior monitoring, and IAM policy auditing to identify injection vectors across the expanded serverless attack surface including API Gateway, S3, SQS, DynamoDB Streams, and CloudWatch event triggers. Activates for requests involving Lambda security assessment, serverless injection detection, function event poisoning analysis, or serverless privilege escalation investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy a Software-Defined Perimeter using the CSA v2.0 specification with Single Packet Authorization, mutual TLS, and SDP controller/gateway configuration to enforce zero trust network access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and investigate Azure service principal abuse including privilege escalation, credential compromise, admin consent bypass, and unauthorized enumeration in Microsoft Entra ID environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune detection logic for reducing false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) to aggregate, correlate, and distribute threat intelligence feeds from multiple sources for centralized IOC management and automated SIEM integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds an automated malware submission and analysis pipeline that collects suspicious files from endpoints and email gateways, submits them to sandbox environments and multi-engine scanners, and generates verdicts with IOCs for SIEM integration. Use when SOC teams need to scale malware analysis beyond manual sandbox submissions for high-volume alert triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Leverages Splunk Enterprise Security and SPL (Search Processing Language) to investigate security incidents through log correlation, timeline reconstruction, and anomaly detection. Covers Windows event logs, firewall logs, proxy logs, and authentication data analysis. Activates for requests involving Splunk investigation, SPL queries, SIEM log analysis, security event correlation, or log-based incident investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate supply chain attack artifacts including trojanized software updates, compromised build pipelines, and sideloaded dependencies to identify intrusion vectors and scope of compromise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes Windows Security, System, and Sysmon event logs in Splunk to detect authentication attacks, privilege escalation, persistence mechanisms, and lateral movement using SPL queries mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate Windows-based threats, build detection queries, or perform forensic timeline analysis of Windows endpoints and domain controllers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate USB device connection history from Windows registry, event logs, and setupapi logs to track removable media usage and potential data exfiltration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate compromised Docker containers by analyzing images, layers, volumes, logs, and runtime artifacts to identify malicious activity and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided multi-page redesign of an existing website through a four-phase pipeline — extract (crawl and capture the current site), direct (set a visual direction), prototype (generate redesigned HTML), and migrate (emit a deployable static site). Tracks progress incrementally per page in stardust/state.json so redesigns are resumable. Delegates the per-page design craft (typography, spacing, color, layout, motion) to the impeccable skill. Use when the user wants to redesign, revamp, modernize, or restyle an existing site they can point to by URL, run the extract/direct/prototype/migrate flow, or resume a multi-page redesign. Not for designing a brand-new site from scratch or one-off single-component edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate the migrate-prep cascade — extract --prep → direct --prep → prototype --prep → assets prep — with confirmation gates between phases. Builds the data structure migrate consumes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate and triage runtime incidents involving the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEM as a Cloud Service environments only, using runtime-backed MCP evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Silent failure hunting routing. Use when a change might pass while skipping work, swallowing errors, losing evidence, weakening gates, or reporting false success; do not use for broad code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform direct, bounded browser inspection through the `browser.qa` capability when the user requests runtime UI evidence or one browser-specific claim needs DOM/accessibility/console/network/visual verification; do not trigger for every UI change, backend work, delegated QA, or durable E2E artifact routing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route an explicitly requested independent/delegated browser QA assignment or durable E2E evidence need; do not trigger for direct Playwright/DOM/console/network inspection, ordinary UI implementation, backend-only work, or production-mutating flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or modify production UI components, layouts, client state, responsive behavior, accessibility, or UX inside an app when that frontend surface is the primary deliverable; do not trigger for rich campaign/media pages, backend integration, every user-facing text change, delegated browser QA, or review alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update source-grounded documentation when the user explicitly asks for docs/ADR/onboarding material, a public contract change requires docs, or an accepted hard-to-reverse decision meets the ADR gate; do not trigger for every feature, architecture discussion, implementation, review, or SHIP request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。