「report」の検索結果

Run frontend functional, accessibility, visual, and performance test planning with structured reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build repeatable data-to-Docs pipelines from Sheets and Drive sources. Use for automated status reports, template-based document assembly, and scheduled publishing workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize vulnerability remediation using KEV-style exploitation context plus asset criticality. Use for CVE triage, patch order decisions, and remediation reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate SAST, SCA, DAST, secrets, API, frontend, and backend security checks into one report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate database schema, migrations, indexes, and query behavior with structured pass/fail reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and orchestrate authorized Nmap host discovery, port and service enumeration, NSE profiling, and reporting artifacts for in-scope targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack report-only QA method for checking web or UI behavior, documenting blockers, and preserving evidence without modifying code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure and audit C/C++ code size, namespace distribution, function complexity, nesting, recurrence, and namespace coupling in the EMULATORS framework. Use when Codex needs codebase statistics, complexity baselines, namespace comparisons, duplication indicators, hotspots, architectural growth analysis, or before/after complexity reports while excluding third-party code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formatting, structure, and execution rules for Quarto markdown documents. Trigger when: - Writing, editing, or rendering Quarto documents, reports, presentations, or websites. - Files matching the pattern **/*.qmd are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: quarto render, quarto preview, knitr, jupyter. - Prompt contains keywords: quarto, qmd, yaml header, code chunk, callout, cross-reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a daily "where are we?" digest from this repo's GitHub epics — a render-only HTML + plain-text email summarising the last 24h of activity plus a progress snapshot of every open epic. Use when asked for a "daily digest", "epic report", "status rapport", "what moved this week", or "where are we on the epics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially probe this monorepo for security flaws at the right depth. Steers the red-team subagent — picks quick/standard/deep from the request, spawns it (fanning out for a wide deep sweep), collates findings into a dated report, and files security/sec:* issues for confirmed high/critical findings. Use when asked to "red-team", "try to hack this", "find security holes", "pentest this package/app", or as the brain behind the CI + daily security runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a monthly digest of the skills in this repo's flow system — a render-only HTML + plain-text email listing every skill grouped by job, plus a "what was added / updated / removed since last digest" band computed from git history. Use when asked for a "skills digest", "what skills do we have", "skills report", "what skills changed", or to keep the skill surface from sprawling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA Engineer role in AID methodology. Use for test strategy, BDD scenarios, bug reporting, acceptance testing, flaky test prevention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Roblox and Luau game code standards. Writes, reviews, and fixes Script, LocalScript, and ModuleScript code and game systems such as shops, DataStore saves, RemoteEvents, combat, NPCs, and UI. Use when a request involves Luau code or a Roblox Studio project, even when Roblox is never named, when a game bug is reported with no file named, and when the user asks to keep these standards active. Also covers Rojo, Argon, Azul, Script Sync, Studio MCP, and community libraries such as ProfileStore, Knit, Trove, and Fusion. Applies to requests written in any language. Not for plain Lua outside Roblox (Neovim, LOVE, Defold, other engines) or for game design with no Luau to write or review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search an index built for coding agents — GitHub issues, merged pull requests, repository READMEs, and curated documentation sites — and get back the matched passages, not just links. Use this skill whenever the question is about code: how a library, framework, or API behaves, what an error message or stack trace means, whether a bug was reported or fixed, what a function returns, what a default is, or which repos do a given thing. Triggers on "why does <library> do X", "what does this error mean", "is this a known bug", "how do I use <library>", "what's the API for", pasted stack traces, and pasted error strings. Prefer this over a general web search for programming questions — it answers from the primary source instead of a blog post about it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

既存のスライドデッキ/レポートを output_mode を保ったまま指定箇所だけ部分修正したいとき、意匠/技術コアと非対象箇所を壊さず修正後の再評価で視覚崩れ0にしたいときに使う。

スライドやレポートを新規生成し、開ける実HTMLを最小guard後に先に提示し、利用者が選んだ場合のみ診断・有界改善したいときに使う。

表形式の数値データを、記述・比較・分解・可視化・意思決定支援の単一 HTML レポートにするスキル。数値はコードで再現し、根拠の強さと限界を示す。レポートの打ち手を、ユーザーへのヒアリングを往復して、現場で動く人向けの「目的・ゴール・やること」の資料にもする。因果推論や高度な予測は対象外。「レポートを作って」「分析して」「データから何が言えるか」「月次レポート」「現場向けの資料」「実行部隊に渡す」「アクションプランにして」などで使う。アプリの画面には使わない。

Lightweight multi-agent research orchestration using one coordinator, three domain leads, and three lightweight research agents. Use for medium-size research, market scans, competitor comparisons, prior-art style exploration, report planning, and any task that benefits from parallel domain decomposition without running a full high-cost research lab.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before completion, PR, deploy, handoff, or when verifying code changes. Runs advisory or blocking checks and reports evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for documents, reports, memos, guides, academic papers, or formal text that needs clear structure, reliable tone, formatting, and diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。