「eth」の検索結果

Audit designs against 19 rules across Figma files and code (HTML/CSS/React/Vue/Tailwind). Auto-detects framework and design system (MUI, Chakra, shadcn/ui, Ant Design, Radix, Bootstrap). Runs code superpowers across all 19 categories: aria, focus, contrast, tokens, responsive, motion, forms, navigation, spacing, states, microcopy, elevation, iconography/SVG. Flags color blindness risk. Audits dark patterns, ethical design, Nielsen's heuristics. Outputs before/after diffs, developer handoff reports, wireframe-to-spec. English and Korean. Triggers on: check my design, review my UI, audit my layout, is this accessible, design review, color contrast, WCAG, a11y, pixel perfect, Figma audit, CSS check, dark patterns, is this GDPR compliant, is this manipulative, is my form accessible, is my dark mode correct, wireframe to spec, heuristic review, Nielsen audit, usability heuristics, 디자인 검토, 접근성 확인, 색상 대비, 다크 패턴, 와이어프레임 스펙.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

It's 11pm before your launch. Your PH page is ready but you have no idea what actually moves the ranking algorithm. Upvotes? Comments? Time-of-day? This is the hour-by-hour operations manual from someone who's coached 30+ #1 finishes. What's inside: • Ranking algorithm deep-dive (it's not just upvotes — weighted factors decoded) • Launch day minute-by-minute checklist (PST timing, first 3 hours are critical) • Voter mobilization strategies (ethical, anti-spam-safe approaches) • Asset preparation templates (gallery, tagline ≤60 chars, maker comments) • Post-launch 72h momentum plan (convert PH traffic → retained users) Built from: 30+ PH #1 daily wins, 10+ weekly top 3, 2 monthly top 5. 3,000-5,000+ upvotes per launch. Triggers: "Product Hunt" | "PH launch" | "Product Hunt #1" | "PH ranking" | "Product Hunt strategy" | "PH upvotes" | "launch day" | "PH打榜" | "Product Hunt攻略" | "PH ranking algorithm"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural guidance for building node-based UIs with React Flow. Use when designing flow-based applications, making decisions about state management, integration patterns, or evaluating whether React Flow fits a use case.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Go backend code review with optional parallel review areas. Use when reviewing changed Go files; detects BubbleTea, Wish SSH, and Prometheus and loads the matching review skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explanation documentation patterns for understanding-oriented content - conceptual guides that explain why things work the way they do. Use when writing an explanation doc, conceptual guide, understanding/background doc, design rationale, or architecture explanation, or when asked how/why something works. Builds on the docs-style core writing principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write essays, articles, and blog posts in Paul Graham's voice — plain, spoken prose that reasons out loud and lands surprising true claims, not AI filler. Use when asked to write or rewrite something "like Paul Graham", "in PG's style", or to make a piece read like a person thinking on the page rather than generated text. Built from a stylistic model of 18 of his essays (see SOURCES.md).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provision and drive a `pu` box — an Incus container used as a clean Linux host for CI, builds, and evidence capture. Use when you need to run something on a fresh remote box instead of the user's machine: `nix run` a build, run CI against a real host, capture screenshots/video off-machine, or reproduce on a pristine environment. Covers create/connect/scp/destroy, running remote commands, copying artifacts back, and the no-egress failure mode. Triggers on "pu box", "spin up a box", "run this on a box", "ephemeral host", "pu create/connect/destroy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a kolu blog post grounded in the real build history — mine the Claude Code session logs behind a feature for the actual story (for large efforts, fan out over the transcripts with an ultracode workflow), draft it in the author's voice, and wire it into the Astro site. Use when asked to write a blog post or engineering essay about something that was built, especially one that should read as a narrative of what actually happened rather than invented marketing copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify, write, and audit documentation per Diátaxis (diataxis.fr) — the four-quadrant method (tutorials · how-to guides · reference · explanation). Encodes the compass as a decision procedure, each quadrant's contract as hard rules, and an executable mixed-mode audit. Project-agnostic; the per-repo doc-location mapping lives in a repo rule of the project's own (kolu: `.apm/instructions/diataxis.instructions.md`). Use when writing any user-facing doc, structuring a docs site, or auditing existing docs for mixed modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debt payoff strategy generator. Compares avalanche (highest interest first) vs snowball (smallest balance first) methods, calculates payoff timelines and total interest saved, and recommends optimal payment allocation across multiple debts. Includes credit card consolidation and refinancing analysis. Use when the user says "/finance debt", "pay off my debt", "snowball or avalanche", "consolidation", or asks for any debt strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spending analysis and custom budget builder. Analyzes spending patterns using 50/30/20 rule, zero-based budgeting, or envelope method. Categorizes expenses, identifies waste, suggests cuts, and produces a 12-month budget. Use when the user says "/finance budget", "build me a budget", "analyze my spending", "where is my money going", or asks about expense optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kundenforschung datensparsam und einwilligungsorientiert planen, durchführen und auswerten. Nutze diesen Skill für Interviewleitfäden, Umfragen, Usability-Tests, die Auswertung vorhandener Gespräche, Support-Tickets oder Bewertungen, und für Personas, Segmente und Jobs-to-be-Done. Klärt vorab Zweck, Rechtsgrundlage, Einwilligung, Aufzeichnung, Pseudonymisierung und Aufbewahrung, wertet nur innerhalb des Stichprobenrahmens aus und trennt Befund von Entscheidung. Beachtet DSGVO, BDSG und Beschäftigtendaten; Österreich und Schweiz werden getrennt behandelt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging method: 5-step root-cause analysis (capture, isolate, hypothesize, investigate, fix & verify) plus common bug-pattern reference. Use when errors, exceptions, test failures, or unexpected behavior appear. Loaded automatically by the debugger agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run manual tests of the project's running app. Runs a session in one of five modes: exploratory, verification, smoke, assessment (UX, localization, accessibility, improvement review), or AI probe. Also writes a manual test plan that holds only what automated tests cannot judge. Use whenever the user asks, in any language, for something to be tested by hand or for a manual test plan — "manual test", "exploratory test", "bug hunt", "verify the bug fix", "smoke test", "QA this screen", "review this screen's UX", "what would you improve", "check the localized copy", "test the AI agent's answers", "write manual test cases", "kịch bản test manual" — or assigns a test design, test plan or test-case IDs to execute by hand. Not for writing automated tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Act as an end-to-end data scientist: turn business questions into defensible analysis, validated models, and decision-ready reports. Use whenever the user asks to analyze, explore, or profile a dataset or CSV/Parquet/Excel file; asks what drives a metric or why a number changed ("why did churn go up?"); wants to test whether a difference is real (A/B tests, experiments, "is this significant?", "how many samples do I need?"); wants a predictive model (churn, forecast, scoring, segmentation, classification, regression); asks to review an existing analysis, notebook, or model for flaws; or needs results written up for decision-makers. Triggers in any language ("phân tích dữ liệu", "xây model dự đoán", "kiểm định A/B"), even when they never say "data science" or "statistics".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Uses the Hyperlane CLI to manually deliver (self-relay) a message between chains that are Ethereum protocol type.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。