562 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Search the web, platforms, and datasets. Use when asked to search, find, look up, research, or discover information from the web, YouTube, Amazon, eBay, news, academic sources, or any online platform.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three modes for CS-conference papers (CVPR/ICCV/ECCV vision, ACL/EMNLP/NAACL NLP, ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/AAAI ML). DIRECT-EDIT mode (common): the user describes a change in Chinese or English and the manuscript (LaTeX or Markdown) is edited directly through a CS-venue writing toolkit with author sign-off (use for 改这段 / 把中文想法写成 latex / polish / de-AI / translate / compress a passage). REVIEW mode (occasional, pre-submission): harden the paper through an adversarial courtroom review engine (N holistic domain reviewers / contestability routing / two-sided trial / three-way verdict / clerk-converged multi-round loop) with consensus-gated, author-signed revisions (use for review / critique / 审稿 / 评审 / mock-review). AUTO mode (unattended, opt-in via /goal): run the review-revise loop toward a verifiable goal, applying safe fixes under a drift-bounded policy and queueing risky ones. Resolves all inputs at runtime, no hardcoded paths. Not a from-scratch drafter (use ml-paper-writing) and not an official-venue rebuttal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, implement, or optimize student and education discount programs. Also use when the user mentions "student discount," "education discount," "student plan," "for students," ".edu discount," "academic pricing," "student verification," "SheerID," "UNiDAYS," or "education program." For startup pricing page, use startups-page-generator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search CNKI (中国知网) for papers by keyword. Use when the user wants to find academic papers on a topic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns for individual long-form content pieces. Case studies, whitepapers, research reports, definitive guides, manifestos, ebooks, long-form tutorials. The structural disciplines that distinguish publication-quality long-form from bloggy-long padding or academic bloat. Different from pillar-content-architecture (which covers hub structure); this skill covers individual deep-dive pieces. Triggers on long-form content, case study writing, whitepaper, research report, definitive guide, ebook, manifesto, long-form tutorial, deep-dive article, anchor piece, foundational article, structural archetypes. Also triggers when a piece is over 3,000 words and the team is unsure how to structure it, when a long-form draft feels padded or saggy, or when a flagship asset needs the depth to actually earn the length.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compatibility entry point for researching a current topic into a source-backed Markdown brief and turning it into a Codex Slides outline or rendered deck. Use for market, competitive, policy, technical, academic, or other presentation requests that need current facts, figures, comparisons, or citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered academic paper search and retrieval
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan and summarize recent academic papers from Semantic Scholar
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search Semantic Scholar for academic papers on a given topic
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline. Supports PDF files and LaTeX source packages (.tar.gz/.zip). Covers 10 disciplines: cs, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, economics, psychology, environmental_science, mathematics, social_sciences. Use when the user asks to review, evaluate, critique, or assess a research paper, check references, or verify a BibTeX file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to persuade. The skill does not rewrite, improve, or attack the argument — it tells you how it actually lands on a sceptical, experienced reader with no prior context. Works on skeleton arguments, witness statements, letters before action, position statements, academic articles, and non-legal structured reasoning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on "edit my article," "review this draft," "critique my note," "check my Bluebook citations," "is my argument sound," "read my law review piece," "workshop this paper," "pre-submission review." Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a lesson that embeds PERMA wellbeing elements alongside academic learning objectives. Use when planning lessons that intentionally support both content mastery and student flourishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anchor curriculum learning in a specific local place with connections to community, culture, and identity. Use when connecting academic content to students' local environment and heritage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse the language demands of a classroom task to identify barriers for EAL and multilingual learners. Use when adapting tasks, planning support, or assessing linguistic accessibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, triage, and write academic rebuttals and review responses. Use when an AI research agent needs to handle conference, journal, workshop, or grant reviews; classify reviewer concerns; decide what evidence or experiments can change the decision; write an AC-facing executive summary; draft per-reviewer responses; correct factual misunderstandings without sounding hostile; handle novelty, baseline, method, experiment, clarity, and scope objections; or produce a final rebuttal checklist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and revise academic papers with a senior-reviewer workflow. Use when an AI research/coding agent needs to work on an existing paper draft, PDF, LaTeX project, Word document, markdown manuscript, rejected paper, or paper idea that already has a concrete direction, and produce: paper maps, weakness audits, insight/novelty checks, reviewer objections, claim-experiment matrices, theory/proof checks, experiment plans, statistics/reproducibility audits, figure/table audits, ethics/compliance checks, revision plans, detailed section edits, or final submission checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translates or rewrites Chinese text into English using a 'critical dialogue' tone, characterized by engaging questions, analytical commentary, and a conversational flow while preserving citations and facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
将中文学术文本翻译为符合国际期刊标准的高级英语，并提供多个润色版本以供选择。确保术语准确、逻辑严谨、句式复杂，彻底消除中式英语。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end academic paper writing workflow. Takes a research repository and produces a publication-ready LaTeX manuscript for top ML/AI conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM). Covers repo understanding, structure planning, section drafting, citation management, anti-AI polishing, and conference formatting. Triggers on "write paper", "draft paper", "scholar writing", "paper writing workflow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, revise, and format thesis or dissertation Word documents with strict academic formatting control. Use when an AI agent needs to generate or revise thesis content, normalize Word styles, follow a school template, fix captions or page numbers or section levels, or produce evidence-based Mermaid figures and LaTeX-formatted code listings for a thesis document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。