「acceptance」の検索結果

Turn a short natural-language request into a bounded work contract (intent, scope, acceptance, initial queue) without asking for code or architecture review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bridge the gap from product specifications to implemented features. Document requirements, acceptance criteria, tech design, and track implementation progress in Notion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and repair a failed GEODE smoke workflow within the requested acceptance criteria. Preserve failed evidence, verify the shared root cause, and apply merge, rebuild, or live rerun stages only when authorized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces internal case viability and conflict check memos for personal injury litigation intake. Screens conflicts, assesses liability and damages, checks statute of limitations, and outputs an accept/decline recommendation. Use when evaluating new PI intake, running conflict checks, assessing case merit pre-filing, or preparing acceptance memos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts time-limited policy-limits demand letters that create an opportunity-to-settle record for third-party bad faith exposure. Use when the user mentions time-limited demand, policy limits demand, bad faith notice, Stowers demand, civil remedy notice, failure to settle demand, excess exposure letter, insurer settlement opportunity, or needs help with acceptance mechanics for a policy-limits offer. Also trigger for Georgia O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67.1 compliance, Florida statutory bad faith prerequisites, or documenting insurer refusal to settle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates an approved plan across 8 dimensions before build — incomplete acceptance criteria, missing dependencies, unresolved risks. Use after Gate 1, before Test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Negotiates a file-based sprint contract between generator and evaluator before code is written: turns a spec into testable acceptance criteria with rubric tie-ins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps test coverage to plan acceptance criteria and flags requirements with no tests. Use during Test/Review phases. NOT for running tests (mk:testing); NOT for structural review (mk:review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only spec analysis on a Confluence page (+children): requirements, acceptance criteria, gaps, user stories report. NOT page CRUD (mk:confluence-page) or ticket scoring (mk:planning-engine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when negotiating a file-based sprint contract between the generator (developer) and evaluator before code is written. Translates a product-level spec into testable acceptance criteria with rubric tie-ins. Triggers on /mk:sprint-contract, "draft a sprint contract", "negotiate scope for sprint", or before any harness-driven sprint kicks off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when refining a draft user prompt before sending it to a coding agent. Decomposes goal/context/constraints/acceptance/output-format, detects ambiguity and model-coupled framing, then emits a model-agnostic rewrite. Supports --analyze, --score, and --deep. NOT for prompts from scratch (mk:brainstorming), plans/reviews (mk:elicit), implementation plans (mk:plan-creator), or general codebase scouting (mk:scout).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep spec analysis on a Confluence page. Reads page (+ children) via the confluence-as wrapper, produces a structured Spec Research Report with requirements, acceptance criteria, gaps, ambiguities, and suggested user stories for human review. Read-only — does NOT create Jira tickets. Triggers: 'analyze spec for PAGE-ID', 'extract requirements from confluence page', 'spec research on URL'. NOT for raw page CRUD (mk:confluence-page); NOT for ticket complexity scoring (mk:planning-engine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely localize unknown Unity games, especially Japanese-to-Chinese projects. Use to discover Unity version/layout/backend, migrate translations across game versions, extract occurrence-mapped text from serialized assets, embedded CSV, bytecode, UI, Localization StringTables, Utage, or middleware, bridge rows through AiNiee-style translation, validate and transactionally write approved candidates, audit residual and runtime-only text or AutoTranslator diffs, diagnose TMP fonts and Addressables/IL2CPP failures, locate saves, or acceptance-test SHA-verified patches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ATAC-seq library quality control -- TSS enrichment, FRiP, fragment-size periodicity, library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), mitochondrial fraction, and ENCODE 4 thresholds. Use when assessing whether an ATAC-seq library passes ENCODE acceptance criteria, diagnosing transposition artefacts, comparing Omni-ATAC vs standard prep quality, or selecting which replicates to drop before peak calling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, execute, and document validation, verification, and transfer of analytical procedures under the governing framework - ICH Q2(R2) and Q14, USP <1220>/<1225>/<1226>, ICH M10 bioanalytical, CLSI EP, or ISO/IEC 17025. Use for HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC, CE, ICP-MS, dissolution, qNMR, qPCR, NIR, and ligand binding or cell-based assays whenever the question is whether a procedure is fit for its intended purpose. Triggers include "method validation", "analytical method validation", "AMV", "validation protocol", "acceptance criteria", "linearity", "reportable range", "accuracy and precision", "repeatability", "intermediate precision", "recovery", "LOD", "LOQ", "detection limit", "quantitation limit", "specificity", "robustness", "method transfer", "method comparison", "Deming", "Passing-Bablok", "Bland-Altman", "equivalence testing", "OOS investigation", "ICH Q2", "Q2(R2)", "Q14", "USP 1225", "ICH M10", "incurred sample reanalysis", "ISR", "CLSI EP", and any request to show that an assay works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Oracle-bound spec-review check that every structured Rollout prerequisite binds to an enforcement-type acceptance criterion. A prerequisite whose `enforced-by` is missing, dangling, or points at a non-enforcement AC is a BLOCKER (hard-blocks implementation entry via the checker fan-out verdict); a prerequisite left in free prose is ADVISORY. Read-only. Runs in the spec-review fan-out before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a Workflow Phase 1 intake document capturing a new request — the problem, the desired outcome, constraints, and testable acceptance criteria. Use when a user brings a new feature, change, or investigation that doesn't yet have a spec. The output lives at `docs/intake/<slug>.md` and feeds `/scout`, `/research`, and `/spec` downstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when planning or upgrading an internal skill/workflow for business operations, especially when turning a messy idea into a structured skill plan, migration plan, acceptance checklist, or packaging decision. Particularly useful for Obsidian knowledge base consolidation, workspace migration, content library cleanup, and integrating multiple workbenches into one operating system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn an idea into a Conventional Docs Decision, then a Plan: classify the request, explore options and risks through dialogue, then commit a numbered Decision that review, prototypes, and acceptance move through. Use PROACTIVELY before any creative work — new features, new subsystems, interface or dependency changes, or any open-ended design question ("what are the options", "how should I approach", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "write a decision", "ADR").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only reviewer for agent-flow. Judges one diff against the acceptance criteria, AGENTS.md rules, protected paths and risk boundaries; returns a JSON verdict with line-anchored findings. Use when launched with AGENT_FLOW_ROLE=reviewer or asked for an agent-flow review of a diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforce traceability from natural-language intent to machine predicates, final observables, evidence, and owner-readable acceptance. Use when conducting any audit, review, QA pass, parity or compliance check, security assessment, code or architecture review, visual or behavioral comparison, data validation, system verification, completion gate, or claim that an implementation satisfies a human request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every progress update, status report, problem explanation, ETA, review, acceptance, or completion report to the operator/owner, especially when they ask “到哪了”, “什么问题”, “做了什么”, “结果呢”, “还要多久”, or “说人话”. Translate technical evidence into visible or operational outcomes before details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to verify a story or ticket implementation against its spec - per-AC verdicts, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, then adversarial maintainer verification. Requires the qa/review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, QA this branch, verify story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。