「assess」の検索結果

Comprehensive market environment analysis and reporting tool. Analyzes global markets including US, European, Asian markets, forex, commodities, and economic indicators. Provides risk-on/risk-off assessment, sector analysis, and technical indicator interpretation. Triggers on keywords like market analysis, market environment, global markets, trading environment, market conditions, investment climate, market sentiment, forex analysis, stock market analysis, 相場環境, 市場分析, マーケット状況, 投資環境.

Assess one bounded Proto UI Adapter question without changing repository or external state. Use for new-Adapter research, target compatibility, catalog readiness, reviewed Module support or omission evidence, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, dependency risk, or implementation readiness. Do not catalog, implement, repair, or approve the Adapter slice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Proto UI's dynamic comprehension assessment and derive an unsigned local task-fit result. Use when an Agent needs review calibration or a fresh autonomous task and review ceiling. Do not use a self-result as identity, permission, or acceptance evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement one governed Proto UI Adapter-profile realization slice. Use when target and runtime range, supported or omitted Module role, Host Capability fidelity, lifecycle translation, failure behavior, compatibility boundary, and evidence scope are fixed by current authority. Use pui-adapter-assess for research or readiness assessment and pui-regression first for a governed failing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when rating a source with the NATO Admiralty Scale, the user asks "is this reliable?" / "rate this source", or the tradecraft pipeline calls for source assessment before publishing. Reliability A-F, credibility 1-6.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing the maturity of a CTI programme, the user asks "how mature is our CTI?" / "what should we improve next?", or wants a benchmark against the five-level model across six dimensions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when surfacing the assumptions underlying an analytical judgment, the user asks "what are we assuming?" / "are these assumptions still valid?", or before publishing a high-impact assessment. Standard SAT applied during major assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive code review checklist and methodology. Use when reviewing PRs, conducting code audits, or assessing code quality. Keywords: review, PR, code review, audit, assess, quality, check

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when assessing cloud infrastructure for security misconfigurations, IAM privilege escalation paths, S3 public exposure, open security group rules, or IaC security gaps. Covers AWS, Azure, and GCP posture assessment with MITRE ATT&CK mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes comprehensive red team exercises that simulate real-world adversary operations against an organization's people, processes, and technology. The red team operates with stealth as a primary objective, employing the full attack lifecycle from initial reconnaissance through objective completion while testing the organization's detection and response capabilities. This differs from penetration testing by focusing on adversary emulation rather than vulnerability identification. Activates for requests involving red team exercise, adversary simulation, adversary emulation, or full-scope offensive security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate a reusable technical book manuscript workspace with writing structure, reader persona SSOT, review rules, and optional Markdown to Re:VIEW/PDF support. Use when organizing a book manuscript repo, defining or reviewing target readers, standardizing chapter/section files, setting writing/review agents, handling publisher proof comments, or assessing an existing writing workspace. Triggers on book writing workspace, reader persona, reader audience, 読者ペルソナ, persona SSOT, technical book project, 執筆ワークスペース, manuscript workflow, Re:VIEW workspace, proof PDF, annotated proof, publisher proof comments, 校正, 校正注釈, and 初校.

Generate Azure environment monthly report (Markdown + PowerPoint) from Azure Advisor and Cost Management API. Use when creating Advisor recommendations report, cost trend analysis, or security/reliability assessment for a customer subscription. Triggers on 'Advisor report', 'Azure monthly report', 'subscription report', 'Azure環境レポート', '簡易月次レポート'.

"Conduct a systematic literature review following the PRISMA framework with explicit search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, quality assessment, and transparent synthesis. Use this skill when the user needs to design a reproducible literature search, apply PRISMA flow documentation, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, assess study quality, or when they ask 'how do I do a systematic review', 'what is PRISMA', or 'how do I make my literature review reproducible'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bloom's revised taxonomy to classify learning objectives and design assessments across six cognitive levels. Use this skill when the user needs to write learning objectives at specific cognitive levels, align assessment with instructional goals, or evaluate curriculum for cognitive complexity distribution — even if they say 'how to write learning objectives', 'what level of thinking does this require', or 'higher-order thinking skills'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Porter's Five Forces framework to assess industry competitive dynamics and attractiveness. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze an industry's profitability structure, evaluate market entry barriers, assess supplier or buyer bargaining power, or understand competitive intensity — even if they say 'industry analysis' or 'is this market worth entering' without naming Porter's explicitly.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Conduct FMEA to systematically identify, prioritize, and mitigate potential failure modes. Use this skill when the user needs to assess product or process risks, prioritize corrective actions, or build a risk register — even if they say 'failure mode analysis', 'risk assessment', 'what could go wrong', or 'RPN calculation'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess identified vulnerabilities for exploitability, impact, and risk. Provide CVSS scoring and remediation strategies. Use when analyzing security findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-activates during requirements analysis to assess security risks using OWASP Top 10 framework, identify security requirements, and recommend mitigation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authorized offensive security skill for ethical penetration testing, red-team planning, vulnerability validation, reconnaissance of owned assets, web/API/mobile/cloud assessment, report writing, remediation guidance, and lab-based security testing. Use only for systems the user owns or is authorized to test; focus on safe, scoped, legal assessment and defensive improvement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal network assessment. VLAN hopping, ARP spoofing detection, broadcast protocol abuse (LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS), network segmentation verification, SNMP enumeration, NFS exposure, router/switch audit, and internal service mapping. Assumes attacker has network access. Uses nmap, arp-scan, nbtscan, snmpwalk, onesixtyone, smbmap, nfs-common, masscan, hping3, and netexec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。