「codebase」の検索結果

Fullstack development toolkit with project scaffolding for Next.js, FastAPI, MERN, and Django stacks, code quality analysis with security and complexity scoring, and stack selection guidance. Use when the user asks to "scaffold a new project", "create a Next.js app", "set up FastAPI with React", "analyze code quality", "audit my codebase", "what stack should I use", "generate project boilerplate", or mentions fullstack development, project setup, or tech stack comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an existing loop for weak checks, unsafe authority, unbounded repetition, stale state, or unclear stopping behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy applications to Render by analyzing codebases, generating render.yaml Blueprints, and providing Dashboard deeplinks. Use when the user wants to deploy, host, publish, or set up their application on Render's cloud platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates custom design system rules for the user's codebase. Use when user says "create design system rules", "generate rules for my project", "set up design rules", "customize design system guidelines", or wants to establish project-specific conventions for Figma-to-code workflows. Requires Figma MCP server connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The durable documentation set that makes an AI-built (vibe-coded) app reviewable before shipping. A small core every app needs — architecture, user/permission flows, permissions, variables/secrets, and a test-coverage map — plus conditional docs added only when they apply: emails, scheduled work, SEO, and embedded agents/automation. Defines what each doc must capture and how a reviewer or auditor uses it. Use when documenting a codebase for handoff, mapping user journeys and trust-boundary crossings, planning test coverage, or preparing for a security or performance audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The method for finding the gap between what a system is supposed to do and what the code actually does — the class of bug generic scanners miss because they have no model of intent. Defines what counts as documented intent, what counts as implementation evidence, which mismatches matter, and how to avoid hand-wavy findings. Use when auditing AI-built code, reviewing access control against documented permissions, or checking whether a codebase matches its own documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track, categorize and prioritize technical debt across the codebase — scans for debt indicators, maintains a register.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh the repo's captured learnings against the current codebase. Use when auditing stale, overlapping, superseded, or drifted learnings; avoid general refactor, debugging, or code review unless the learnings store is explicit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a PR against the Pascal architectural rules — package boundaries (core/viewer/editor/nodes), the registry-driven composition model (def.geometry / def.renderer / def.system), legacy-dispatch regressions, the slots + world-scale-UV convention for new nodes/geometry, hook hygiene (useEditor/useScene/useViewer), and selector performance. Use when the user asks to review a PR, audit a branch, or check that changes respect the codebase's architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous rule adherence checker. Scans the codebase for rule violations, fixes the highest-impact ones in an isolated worktree, runs full validation, creates a PR. Uses memory to track progress across runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates Android applications from the old, legacy Google Mobile Ads (GMA) SDK (com.google.android.gms:play-services-ads) to the new GMA Next-Gen SDK (com.google.android.libraries.ads.mobile.sdk:ads-mobile-sdk). Provides comprehensive mapping tables for imports, classes, and method signatures to help determine migration steps. Use when migrating an existing Android codebase from the old, legacy GMA SDK to GMA Next-Gen SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "ponytail debt", "/ponytail-debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", "ponytail ledger", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report, changes nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route code, repository, and data/SQL work to isolated Kortix sessions instead of burning your main context on it. Use when asked to implement a feature, fix a bug, make failing tests pass, work a ticket/issue, refactor, navigate or change a codebase, ship a PR, review a pull request, or run SQL/warehouse analysis against a dataset — and when the user wants two agents or parallel reviewers/investigators on the same work. Covers the explore-vs-session routing call, deciding where the code lives (this project's repo vs cloning an external GitHub repo) or where the data lives, finding the repo with gh, spawning sessions in parallel, dual PR reviews, and reporting results back. Triggers: 'implement', 'fix the bug', 'make the tests pass', 'work this ticket', 'refactor this', 'open a PR', 'review this PR', 'run two agents on it', 'query the warehouse', 'analyze this dataset'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain how a public GitHub repository is built using GitDiagram's architecture diagram. Use when the user asks how a GitHub repository or open-source project is structured or organized, wants an architecture or system diagram of a repo, or is starting work in an unfamiliar codebase hosted on GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage an incoming verdaccio/verdaccio GitHub issue against the codebase, the affected release line, and related issues, then choose the labels from the repository's existing taxonomy. Use whenever the user asks to triage, classify, assess, reproduce, prioritize, or label an issue, especially when an issue URL or number is supplied.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate opencodex (`ocx`): discover CLI tasks offline, inspect local configuration, and manage a running proxy’s account pool, providers, models, routing, usage report, and management API. Use for proxy operation rather than editing the opencodex codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and implement evidence-backed simplifications in the ego-lite repository. Use when reviewing the codebase for dead code, duplicated state or APIs, speculative abstractions, unnecessary compatibility layers, hand-written infrastructure, excessive tests or documentation, or when the user asks to reduce code size or maintenance complexity without hiding behavior changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test the harness", "run integration tests", "validate features with real API", "test with real model calls", "run agent loop tests", "verify end-to-end", or needs to verify OpenHarness features on a real codebase with actual LLM calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。