「commits」の検索結果

Package management discipline for any JavaScript/TypeScript project: dependency declaration, semver, scripts conventions, lockfile hygiene, package-manager detection (npm/yarn/pnpm). Stack-agnostic — referenced by every JS/TS framework plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Add a dependency correctly (right field, right semver range). - Pick the project's package manager from lockfile. - Define `scripts` entries that match conventions. - Avoid lockfile mistakes (manual edits, wrong commits). Do NOT use this skill for: - Code-level conventions (see the active framework plugin's conventions skill). - Framework-specific package patterns (NestJS modules, Angular schematics, Expo SDK choice etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble the human genetic evidence for and against a target before a programme commits to it — the evidence class that most improves the odds of surviving clinical development. Use this skill to pull gnomAD constraint metrics (LOEUF, pLI, observed/expected) that show whether loss of function is tolerated in people, retrieve GWAS Catalog associations and fine-mapped credible sets for a gene, and read a natural human knockout as a safety readout. Also trigger on gnomAD, LOEUF, pLI, loss-of-function intolerance, mutational constraint, GWAS Catalog, credible set, human knockout, genetic support, or target safety dossier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for release, version bump, changelog, or branch workflow beyond a single commit. Don't use for single commits or for publishing to a package registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure the active Agent model with pinned offline ModelTrace sampling and return an unsigned closed-set attribution record. Use before Agent-originated commits, Issue/PR creation or material updates, comments, reviews, and current collaboration writes in either execution mode. Do not treat a fingerprint, declared model label, or record reference as authenticated identity, permission, independent review, or acceptance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create conventional commit messages by analyzing staged changes. Generates semantic commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or "create commit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create conventional commit messages by analyzing staged changes. Generates semantic commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or "create commit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any multi-step work with a stated goal — a feature, a bugfix spanning multiple files, a QA sweep, a doc draft + iterations, a multi-day investigation — create an ATO Mission instead of doing it via bare `ato dispatch` calls. A Mission persists the goal + the verifiable success criteria, lets the coordinator tick drive the work across days, captures every event in a structured audit trail (SQLite + markdown narrative), and integrates parallel agents' work via merge strategies. Complement to `ato-warroom` (the cross-family decision before you start) and `ato-review` (the post-code-diff review). Missions is where multi-step work LIVES; war-rooms are where decisions ABOUT it get made; reviews are where the resulting commits get vetted. Fires when: the work has more than one decision point, a verifiable end state, or runs across more than one session. Use it for any ATO development that doesn't fit in a single dispatch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before any material decision — code chunk, plan, strategy, design, scope cut, push to GitHub — convene a war-room. The session driver takes the CEO seat: frame the tradeoff, summon specialist seats from whatever agent roster the user has built, dispatch a cross-family voice via `ato dispatch` so priors actually disagree, decide. A failure-mode filter (wrong assumptions / overcomplexity / orthogonal edits / imperative-over-declarative — Karpathy's four are one good default, swap in your own) runs on every dispatch. Place in the v2.16 stack: war-rooms DECIDE before code starts; `ato-mission` EXECUTES the work between decisions (multi-step, goal-driven, persisted across days); `ato-review` VERIFIES the resulting commits. Use a war-room for the design verdict, hand the verdict to a Mission, review the merged result. Fires before: sending a code draft to the user as final, opening a PR, pushing to a remote-tracking branch, committing >50 LOC of behavior change, or delivering a plan or strategic recommendation as the final answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare outstanding commits on a feature branch for a pull request to upstream

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the trackcn CLI to sync files, directories, commits, pull requests, and agent skills from GitHub into a codebase while preserving local edits. Read this before running trackcn commands or modifying trackcn-managed files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /claude-setup:build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight build: explore → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Verifies build + tests, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default for everyday features; reach for /build only when the work needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the stable Galyarder Framework release changelog at releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md by reading commits, changesets, and merged PR context since the last stable tag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn the working changes into one or more atomic commits with well-written messages. Use whenever the user runs /git-commit or asks to commit their work, wrap up a feature, or "commit what I have."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate CHANGELOG entries following conventional commits format with semantic versioning. Use when finalizing features to maintain proper change history.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a GitHub PR for this Flutter repository using gh CLI. Verifies the work with build-verify and pr-review, generates an inline PR description, commits pending changes when approved, pushes, and opens or updates the PR. Supports stacked PRs by asking for the base branch when detection is ambiguous. Use when the user says "create PR", "open PR", "push PR", or wants to submit their work for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to commit, finish a task, open a PR, summarize work for the user, or when the user asks for a review or summary — NOT just on autonomous commits, which are rare in OpenCode usage

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Husky v9 setup, lint-staged v16 patterns, commitlint with conventional commits, CI/production handling, monorepo setup, migration from v8

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare logical commits, publish through Pharos’s protected-main pull-request gate, monitor deployment, and hand off operational acceptance. Use only when commit, push, publish, release, or deployment watching is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

中文 commit 与 changelog 配置参考——Conventional Commits 中文适配、commitlint/husky/commitizen 中文模板、conventional-changelog 中文配置。仅在用户显式 /chinese-commit-conventions 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upgrade Prisma Next in your app. Bumps every `@prisma-next/*` dependency from the version pinned in the lockfile to the requested target (or npm `latest`), applies any required code-translation steps from the per-transition upgrade instructions, validates with the project's own typecheck + tests, and commits each minor step on its own. Use when the user asks to "upgrade Prisma Next", "bump Prisma Next", "move to Prisma Next X.Y", or asks an agent to deal with an `@prisma-next/*` minor bump in their app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。