1,054 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Process, clean, and compare mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra with Matchms; use when you need reproducible spectral filtering and similarity scoring for metabolomics workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Composes a Discussion around key findings, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and limitations. Use when writing or improving a Discussion section for any biomedical manuscript — including interpreting results, connecting to prior literature, addressing unexpected findings, framing limitations, and writing the conclusion. Also triggers on "write my discussion", "help me discuss my findings", "how do I compare to prior studies", "write the limitations paragraph", or "draft a discussion for my paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks what information a Stripe Connect connected account must provide for verification, onboarding, KYC, or account requirements; when they need to compare requirements between connected-account setups; or when they ask which verification fields, documents, or business details are required for a particular platform country, account country, business type, dashboard, service agreement, or capability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Findings-first code review workflow for AI coding agents. Use when the user asks to review uncommitted changes, commits in a date range, or a branch compared to the main branch / PR-style diff. Focuses on bugs, regressions, correctness risks, missing tests, security/data-safety issues, and other behavior-changing defects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare multiple solutions for correctness and performance
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for querying the Atlas knowledge graph through its MCP tools — the SECONDARY enrichment/comparison layer that adds best-practice context to systems you have ALREADY scanned from your real sources (`az`, repos, dirs). Use when you need to look up nodes, edges, kinds, clusters, stats, or wiki pages in Atlas to compare against your real inventory. (atlas graph, query atlas, atlas mcp, search the graph, graph neighbors, atlas record, atlas kinds, enrichment layer)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare and implement eviction policies (LRU, LFU, FIFO, S3FIFO, ARC) for bounded-capacity caches. Use when choosing or implementing an eviction policy for a buffer pool, page cache, CDN edge, or LLM KV cache, or when writing a replay simulator that supports multiple policies. Clarifies recency vs frequency semantics, queue topology, saturating counters, ghost buffers, and the second-chance rule that distinguishes modern FIFO-family policies from classic LRU.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose and implement clustering algorithms for grouping speaker embeddings after VAD and embedding extraction. Compare Hierarchical clustering (auto-tunes speaker count), KMeans (fast, requires known count), and Agglomerative clustering (fixed clusters). Use Hierarchical clustering when speaker count is unknown, KMeans when count is known, and always normalize embeddings before clustering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
郑希观点库——基于易方达基金经理郑希 2012–2026 年全部公开观点原文语料，外加从语料蒸馏、有本人原话佐证的郑希投资方法的可溯源 research skill。能做： (1) 溯源问答——他怎么看 AI算力/光通信/新能源/半导体/ROE 等，引用其原话作答； (2) 讲解他的投资方法/框架/选股逻辑；(3) 前瞻应用——用他的方法分析当下任意主题/行业/个股，语料没谈过也能据框架推演； (4) 风格化点评——用他季报/手记的口吻写市场点评、季度展望； (5) 言行对照——用他全部基金真实数据（季度持仓/净值/业绩/规模/任职回报）核对"说的"与"买的"，或答他的业绩/重仓/规模； (6) 全市场查询对比——内置约 2.7 万只基金列表，按需抓任意基金真实数据做查询或与郑希对比； (7) 郑希框架评分——给一只基金按他的方法打分（多像郑希会买的）。 When the user mentions 郑希/易方达郑希/zhengxi, asks his view on a sector/stock/theme, his 投资方法/框架/选股/风格/持仓/业绩/净值/规模, wants to apply his approach, a commentary 用郑希口吻, to check words vs holdings, or to look up/compare/score ANY China mutual fund (任意基金/某基金经理/同类对比/给基金打分)——use this skill, even if they don't say "skill", even if the topic isn't in his corpus (fall back to his method). 引用忠于原文、不杜撰；推演与原话区分。研究学习辅助，非投资建议。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold and run a reproducible Monte Carlo simulation study in R — a declared assumption regime, a parameterized DGP, an estimator grid, a seeded replication loop, and a summary of bias, RMSE, empirical SE, coverage, size/power with Monte Carlo standard errors. Use when the user says "run a Monte Carlo simulation", "simulation study", "check the bias/coverage of an estimator", "compare estimators in simulation", "size and power simulation", "Monte Carlo experiment", or wants to demonstrate an estimator's finite-sample properties. Produces a numbered R script in `scripts/R/` and saves per-replication raw results + a summary table to `output/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial Quarto-vs-Beamer parity QA. A critic agent compares the Quarto HTML render to the Beamer PDF benchmark for content/visual parity; a fixer agent applies fixes; loops until APPROVED or two consecutive rounds turn up nothing new (fallback cap 5 rounds). Use when user says "qa the quarto", "check parity", "does the html match the pdf?", "quarto matches beamer?", or after a translate-to-quarto run. Requires both the `.qmd` rendered and a `.pdf` benchmark.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Worked full-length scripts of banqiang-system Chinese opera with their creation records (板腔体全本语料库). Primary texts; 翁偶虹《锁麟囊》 (the revised score edition, 65 arias, 15 self-account-vs-score checks), 汪曾祺等《沙家浜》 (the 1965 text, not the 1970 one; 36 arias, a 12-row two-version diff), 田汉《白蛇传》 (the 1955 book, not the web revision; 16 scenes, 王瑶卿说腔五条), 杨兰春《朝阳沟》 (1978 revival, 50 arias, 口语入唱, per-scene sung/spoken ratios), 魏明伦《潘金莲》 (跨时空, missing pages), 罗怀臻's 越剧《李清照》《真假驸马》, 淮剧《金龙与蜉蝣》, 甬剧《典妻》; plus index tables of 翁偶虹's 60 创作记 and 范钧宏's seven 改编札记. Use when you want to see how a 唱工戏 lays out its 板式, need real scene counts, aria counts and 辙口 to imitate, want the road from raw material to 审腔, are writing a 现代戏 or colloquial lyrics, or compare one author across two声腔 systems. Method is in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang; this skill holds the worked scripts and their creation records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI DevKit · Use when the user asks to brainstorm, ideate, generate ideas, expand options, challenge ideas, pressure-test ideas, compare concepts, narrow choices, name something, plan content angles, explore strategy, evaluate product ideas, technical approaches, experiments, or decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze, recreate, align, and verify reference-video motion. Use when the user asks to recreate, copy, match, align, pixel-align, or compare a video; when a HyperFrames or Remotion remake is judged not aligned; when fixed reference playback and reusable motion components must be separated; or when delivery needs full-frame runtime, render, decode, boundary, timing, and archive evidence instead of sampled screenshots alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when someone asks to audit their AIOS, score the Four Cs, find stale paths or unlinked projects, compare AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md, check Claude/Codex skill compatibility, or assess migration readiness. Automatically saves dated reports and tracks evidence-backed improvements across runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure VM/VMSS router. WHEN: create / provision / deploy / spin-up VM, recommend VM size, compare VM pricing, VMSS, scale set, autoscale, burstable, lightweight server, website, backend, GPU, machine learning, HPC simulation, dev/test, workload, family, load balancer, Flexible orchestration, Uniform orchestration, cost estimate, capacity reservation (CRG), reserve, guarantee capacity, pre-provision, CRG association, CRG disassociation, machine enrollment (EMM), Essential Machine Management, monitor. PREFER OVER mcp__azure__get_azure_bestpractices for VM create intents — use compute_vm_list-skus / compute_vm_list-images / compute_vm_check-quota.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers available Azure OpenAI model capacity across regions and projects. Analyzes quota limits, compares availability, and recommends optimal deployment locations based on capacity requirements. USE FOR: find capacity, check quota, where can I deploy, capacity discovery, best region for capacity, multi-project capacity search, quota analysis, model availability, region comparison, check TPM availability. DO NOT USE FOR: actual deployment (hand off to preset or customize after discovery), quota increase requests (direct user to Azure Portal), listing existing deployments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-meeting debrief — analyzes what happened, compares outcomes to your prep intentions, tracks decision evolution. Use when the user says "debrief", "what just happened in that meeting", "what did we decide", "debrief that call", "post-meeting", "what changed", or right after stopping a recording.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze weekly marketing campaign performance data across channels. Use when analyzing multi-channel digital marketing data to calculate funnel metrics (CTR, CVR) and compare to benchmarks, compute cost and revenue efficiency metrics (ROAS, CPA, Net Profit), or get budget reallocation recommendations based on performance rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare RPI planning and implementation evidence, record review findings, and route follow-up work. Use when an implementation needs acceptance review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive structured autoresearch iteration after evo:discover and the baseline commit. Use when the user invokes /evo:optimize or asks to try ideas, try variants, run experiments, use available GPUs, improve the current best/frontier, continue an evo search, or compare candidate changes in an evo workspace. The orchestrator plans and spawns optimization subagents; candidate edits/runs belong to those subagents. Width is set via subagents=N (1 for serial workloads, larger for parallel); the loop's structural value applies at any width.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。