「contracts」の検索結果

Draft a contract or policy document from a description or template. Use when asked to "draft an NDA", "write an MSA", or "we need a vendor contract".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full legal compliance audit — contracts, policies, regulatory, IP, corporate hygiene. Use when asked to "run a legal audit", "are we legally compliant", or "full compliance review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Service-oriented and microservices architecture patterns for cloud-scale systems. Covers service boundaries, API versioning and backward compatibility, eventual consistency at the API layer, idempotency keys, saga and choreography patterns, bulkheads, circuit breakers, service meshes, and the Vogels "you build it, you run it" operating principle. Use when designing service decomposition, API contracts, inter-service communication, or reviewing a proposed microservices architecture for coupling and resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Cosmos SDK blockchains for 9 consensus-critical vulnerabilities including non-determinism, incorrect signers, ABCI panics, and rounding errors. Use when auditing Cosmos chains or CosmWasm contracts. (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects. (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal). (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialist skill for Python data engineering — pandas, polars, DuckDB, numpy, ETL pipelines, tabular data ingestion, and notebook-to-module extraction. Use when working with dataframes, data validation at ingress boundaries, merge/join operations, typed column contracts, or choosing between pandas vs polars vs DuckDB for a data task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides pytest test architecture for Python 3.11+ using behavioral contracts, risk, and maintenance-adjusted value. Use when choosing unit/integration/property/e2e boundaries, fixture strategy, coverage measurement, or mutation testing. Preserves existing project gates but does not invent test-pyramid ratios, coverage percentages, mutation-score targets, or tests for implementation detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze specific pytest failures using authoritative contracts and a cited product/test evidence chain. Use for failing test names or pytest output, distinguishing product, interface, oracle, and harness defects without automatically changing expectations or forcing an architectural redesign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review pytest test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant faults, behavior-preserving refactors, realistic boundaries, isolation, and diagnostics. Use for test-quality audits, coverage-gap reviews, regression-test changes, or mocking reviews; preserve existing project gates rather than inventing coverage targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit agent lifecycle — validates agent execution capability against configuration. Accepts plugin path, runs 8 semantic audits (capability vs config alignment, skill loading correctness, inter-agent contracts, prompt contradictions, tool sufficiency, dead agents, scriptable patterns, pattern learning), writes reports to .plugin-creator/audits/. Use when auditing agent lifecycle, checking agent capabilities, verifying tool access, finding dead agents, validating agent contract alignment, or confirming agents can execute workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compatibility router for semantic skill tightening. Delegate goal recovery, authority, semantic conservation, evaluation contracts, and instruction optimization to Skill Lapidary rather than duplicating that system in Plugin Creator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an implementation plan can achieve its stated outcome before execution. Use to check requirement coverage, task contracts, dependencies, data/artifact flow, testability, ownership, impact coverage, and executable ordering without checking whether implementation already exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review existing tests against the software and contracts they actually exercise. Use to assess whether a test has justified unique protection, detects consequential faults, tolerates valid refactors, earns its lifecycle cost, or deserves strengthening, replacement, consolidation, or removal consideration. Reviews are read-only and evidence-backed, including TDD and regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local codebase analysis research angle — derives behavioral contracts, coding conventions, SKILL.md flow insertion points, and agent data availability maps from actual source files. Use when the blocking question is answered by reading the repository: what does this function actually do, what pattern does the codebase use for X, where in this workflow does a new step go, or what data does this agent already have.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review test effectiveness against authoritative contracts, relevant fault detection, refactor tolerance, boundary fidelity, isolation, and diagnostic value. Use when auditing test quality, reviewing coverage gaps, improving regression protection, or assessing tests after a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Python boundaries, typing, error handling, tests, dependencies, and supported-version idioms against the target project's contracts and active tools. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for Python source; uses Python-engineering standards when available and retains standalone checks otherwise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[AUTO-INVOKE] MUST be invoked BEFORE deploying contracts or writing deployment scripts (*.s.sol). Covers pre-flight checks, forge script commands, post-deployment validation, and verification. Trigger: any task involving forge script, contract deployment, or block explorer verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

한국 사업자를 위한 근로계약서 자동 작성 스킬. 주40시간 정규직·계약직, 근로기준법 §17 필수 기재 항목, 2026년 최저임금(10,320원/시), 4대보험 의무를 반영. 5인 이상/미만, 수습기간, 고정OT, 포괄임금제 지원.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

법인·사업체 간 외주용역 계약서 자동 작성 스킬. 민법 도급 규정, 하도급법, 불법파견 방지 조항을 반영한 외주용역 계약서 초안 생성.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

개인 프리랜서·1인 사업자와의 용역 계약서 자동 작성 스킬. 민법 위임·도급 규정, 3.3% 원천징수, 지식재산권 귀속 조항을 반영한 프리랜서 계약서 초안 생성.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

유연근무제(탄력근로·선택근로·재택근무) 적용 근로계약서 자동 작성 스킬. 근로기준법 §51·§52 서면합의 요건, 5인 이상/미만 분기, 2026년 최저임금(10,320원/시) 자동 검증.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

기존 근로계약서의 근로조건을 변경할 때 사용하는 근로조건 변경 합의서 자동 작성 스킬. 임금·근무장소·업무내용·근무시간 변경, 5인 미만/이상 분기, 2026년 최저임금 10,320원 검증 포함.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

단시간 근로자·아르바이트용 근로계약서 자동 작성 스킬. 카페·편의점·일반 업종 지원, 주15시간 이상/미만 분기, 2026년 최저임금(10,320원/시) 자동 검증, 5인 이상/미만 분기, 주휴수당 자동 계산.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。