「data quality」の検索結果

Monitor environmental conditions on construction sites. Track air quality, noise levels, vibration, dust, and weather to ensure compliance and worker safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the OpenConstructionERP validation engine: rule packs (BOQ quality, DIN 276, NRM, GAEB, MasterFormat, DPGF) that check estimates at import time and on demand. Use when verifying BOQ correctness or writing custom validation rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create production-quality Android applications following Google's official architecture guidance and NowInAndroid best practices. Use when building Android apps with Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, MVVM architecture, Hilt dependency injection, Room database, or multi-module projects. Triggers on requests to create Android projects, screens, ViewModels, repositories, feature modules, or when asked about Android architecture patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes AutoViz users to automated EDA, data-quality, and text/wordcloud workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes AIX360 explainability tasks across local black-box attribution, counterfactuals and certification, interpretable models, time-series explanations, datasets, and explanation-quality metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared discipline for every hunt-* skill: scope and authorization gating, the two-account rule, the confirmation gate that separates a real finding from a false positive, enumeration limits, stop conditions, marker discipline, wiki-first query and self-heal, FIND output, Deadends, and wiki distillation. ALWAYS LOADED alongside any hunt skill. Also trigger directly on "is this in scope", "is this a real bug", "how do I confirm this", "should I keep going", "how many IDs should I test", "what severity", "how do I report this", "I got someone else's data". Every hunt-* skill assumes this file; without it they run without their safety and quality layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build automated evaluation suites for AI agents using golden datasets, rubrics, and regression gates. Use when shipping agent features, validating prompt changes, or gating deployments on quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides SOC 2 Type II Privacy Trust Services Criteria preparation and audit execution. Covers AICPA TSP Section 100 Privacy criteria P1-P8 including notice, choice/consent, collection, use/retention/disposal, access, disclosure, security, and quality. Includes evidence collection, control testing, and report review. Keywords: SOC 2, privacy criteria, TSP, AICPA, Type II, trust services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-stack autonomous math modeling agent for CUMCM (全国大学生数学建模竞赛). Reads the problem statement and data, iterates through research → coding → verification → LaTeX writing, and produces a publication-quality PDF paper. Use when the user provides a CUMCM problem and wants end-to-end automated modeling, coding, and paper generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO pages that rank on Google AND get cited by LLMs. Uses live SERP data, 500-token chunk architecture, RAG optimization for Gemini 3.5 Flash, the Two-Gate AEO framework (retrieval-pool entry + selected-citation extraction), the Anti-NLP Stuffing Protocol (structural entity placement, no keyword-density stuffing), strict single-service local isolation, and the Reddit Test quality gate. Triggers on: "write an SEO page", "seo-agi", "seo page for [keyword]", "rank for [keyword]", "rewrite this page for SEO", "GEO", "AEO", "write a page that ranks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes a repository and its test suite to generate customized mutation operators tailored to the project. Use this skill when setting up mutation testing, improving test quality, or generating project-specific mutants. Considers language constructs, business logic patterns, API calls, data types, and code complexity to produce effective mutation operators that maximize test sensitivity while avoiding trivial or equivalent mutations. Generates prioritized operator sets (high/medium/low value) with impact summaries. Triggers when users ask to generate mutation operators, customize mutation testing, analyze code for mutation opportunities, or create project-specific mutants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing between engines or models for an agent pipeline and the answer must come from measurement on your own data, not from marketing pages: speech recognition for meeting recordings, the model that turns a transcript into notes, the critic model that checks it. Runs every variant in an isolated container, measures time, cost per hour of input (USD and RUB, with price source and date) and quality (WER/CER and course terms for ASR; code checks plus a judge of a different model for LLM steps), writes results.json/csv and one static analytics page. Triggers on "бенчмарк", "сравни движки", "сколько стоит час записи", "какую модель взять для пайплайна", "benchmark the pipeline", "compare ASR engines".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce video with Moonvalley's Marey model family (Marey Realism v1.5) — a filmmaker-oriented, 1080p/24fps generative video model marketed as trained exclusively on licensed data. Use this skill when a task asks for Marey or Moonvalley specifically, when a brief demands brand-safe / legally reviewed AI video for commercial or studio work, or when the request needs Marey's director-style controls (camera trajectory, motion transfer, pose transfer, keyframing, reference conditioning). It covers what "commercially safe" really means versus the actual terms of service, access routes (Moonvalley web / Voyager, the fal API, ComfyUI), pricing, capability limits, prompt and reference strategy, where Marey fits production versus where other models win, iteration, and quality review. Do not use it for audio generation, for photoreal talking-head dialogue, or as a generic "best video model" default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent must make TwelveLabs do real video-understanding work: indexing footage, semantic/visual search across an archive, generating descriptions, summaries, chapters, highlights, and tags from video, producing multimodal embeddings, or wiring TwelveLabs into a media-production pipeline (NLE panels, logging, compliance review, metadata). Covers the current model families (Marengo for search/embeddings, Pegasus for video-to-text analysis), the v1.3 Video Understanding API (indexes, assets, tasks, search, analyze, embed), prompt construction for analysis, capability and format limits, pricing/quota math, output quality review (hallucination and timestamp accuracy), and privacy/rights obligations when footage shows real people. Not for generating or editing video pixels — this is analysis and retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent quality assurance for AI-generated and AI-assisted media. Use when reviewing, accepting, revising, or reporting on images, video, audio, avatars, ads, product content, social clips, explainers, localization, mixed-source edits, captions, accessibility, provenance, model metadata, safety/policy, and delivery readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

All-in-one read preprocessing with fastp including adapter trimming, quality filtering, deduplication, base correction, and HTML report generation. Use when preprocessing Illumina data and wanting a single fast tool instead of separate Cutadapt, Trimmomatic, and FastQC steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract, SES), k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Spring Boot 4.x applications following the best practices. Use this skill: * When developing Spring Boot applications using Spring MVC, Spring Data JPA, Spring Modulith, Spring Security * To create recommended Spring Boot package structure * To implement REST APIs, entities/repositories, service layer, modular monoliths * To use Thymeleaf view templates for building web applications * To write tests for REST APIs and Web applications * To write ArchUnit tests for testing architecture * To configure the recommended plugins and configurations to improve code quality, and testing while using Maven. * To use Spring Boot's Docker Compose support for local development * To create Taskfile for easier execution of common tasks while working with a Spring Boot application

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the epidemiological and aging research frameworks of Tamara B. Harris (epidemiologist, National Institutes of Health). Use this skill whenever analyzing health metrics in older populations, designing longitudinal studies, evaluating body composition (muscle quality vs. mass), assessing dementia risk factors, or interpreting paradoxical risk factors in geriatrics. Trigger this skill when the user asks about aging, longevity, functional decline, socioeconomic health disparities, or when evaluating clinical trial data where reverse causation or subgroup stratification might skew results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned operations-architecture discipline that fixes the shape of a system before anyone builds it: entity schema first, exactly one write path per entity, every unit of work routed to a deterministic automation, an AI agent, or a human decision, every existing tool marked absorb, keep, or kill, and the build sequenced into phases whose completion is proved by a command. Use when scoping an automation or agent build, deciding whether a workflow needs a model at all, consolidating a sprawling tool stack, designing the data model under a workflow, choosing a migration path off an old system, or ordering a build so nothing lands on a moving foundation. NOT FOR: executing a planned multi-file repo change (use suede-graph-flo-xr); coordinating parallel builders with file ownership (use suede-agent-teams); lead lifecycle, scoring, and CRM routing rules (use suede-revops); proving agent output quality against an eval set (use suede-ai-eval); reviewing the finished diff (use suede-code-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know if something works — the answer requires running code, not analyzing it. Output is a verdict backed by evidence: passed, failed, or broken. Primary triggers: 'run the tests', 'does X still work after my change?', 'did the merge break anything?', 'verify the fix worked', 'check if the endpoint returns X', 'confirm nothing regressed', 'run tests/unit/test_foo.py', 'let me know the results', 'make sure my changes didn't break anything'. Hard stops — do NOT use for: reviewing test code for quality/coverage gaps, debugging why test infrastructure/databases/seed scripts are misbehaving, writing or fixing tests, diagnosing root causes of unexpected behavior. The deciding question: is the user asking for the result of executing something, or asking for help understanding/analyzing/improving something? If it's the latter, use diagnose or review-code instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you are about to hand off any number, table, chart or analysis someone will act on (a metric query, a dbt mart, a report, an experiment readout) — the pre-delivery checklist for data quality, calculation, reasonableness and presentation, and the pitfalls that produce plausible wrong numbers

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。