「deep」の検索結果

Think and work like an expert Geotechnical Engineer. Use when a task calls for Geotechnical Engineer judgment. Reasons from effective stress and LRFD/EC7 limit states through GDR/GBR/FDR deliverables, shallow and deep foundations (GEC 6/10/12), excavation support (DeepEX, LPILE), ground improvement, ASCE 7 liquefaction, observational-method triggers, and FHWA pile acceptance while treating DSC claims, setup vs. blow count, and GBR-vs-design conflation as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, extract, and compare high-quality public sources with Exa through SandBase. Use when asked for deep web research, source discovery, current evidence, topic investigation, company research, or citation-ready findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Deepgram speech and voice production workflows: speech-to-text transcription, live captions, diarization, audio intelligence, Aura text-to-speech, Flux and Voice Agent live audio, model selection, cost/limits/privacy checks, artifact custody, and production QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use DeepMotion Animate 3D for markerless video-to-3D human motion capture through the cloud portal, sales-gated API, or real-time SDK; covers capture planning, body/hand/face/multi-person limits, custom characters, retargeting, refinement, exports, DCC/game-engine handoff, QA, pricing, privacy, consent, and rights checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module, with implementation hidden in subfolders and reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test native, React Native, hybrid, and Flutter mobile apps with Appium 3.x, Detox, Maestro, and Patrol. Covers device farm setup (BrowserStack, Sauce Labs), gesture simulation, deep link and cold-start testing, push notifications, biometric (Face ID) auth, offline/poor-network simulation, and iOS/Android permission dialog handling. Use when: "mobile test," "Appium," "Detox," "Maestro," "Patrol," "Flutter test," "iOS test," "Android test," "device farm," "deep link," "biometric," "Face ID," "permission dialog," "React Native test." Not for: device/browser matrix strategy in the abstract — use cross-browser-testing; app startup/memory/battery profiling depth — use performance-testing; mobile screenshot diffing — use visual-testing. Related: ci-cd-integration, cross-browser-testing, performance-testing, test-data-management, test-reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, deploy, and update React Native apps with Expo. Covers file-based routing with Expo Router (stacks, tabs, drawers, deep linking), EAS Build and Submit, over-the-air updates, and 50+ SDK modules for camera, location, notifications. Use when setting up Expo, adding navigation, configuring builds, or integrating native device APIs. Trigger words: expo, expo router, eas build, react native expo, file-based routing mobile, deep linking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for DeepEval, the open-source framework for unit testing LLM applications. Helps developers write test cases, define custom metrics, and integrate LLM quality checks into CI/CD pipelines using a pytest-like interface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ANDREJ KARPATHY — SKILL COMPLETA v2.0 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Agente que simula Andrej Karpathy — ex-Director of AI da Tesla, co-fundador da OpenAI, fundador da Eureka Labs, e o maior educador de deep learning do mundo and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Angular Expert workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Modern Angular (v20+) expert with deep knowledge of Signals, Standalone Components, Zoneless applications, SSR/Hydration, and reactive patterns and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ANDREJ KARPATHY — SKILL COMPLETA v2.0 workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Agente que simula Andrej Karpathy — ex-Director of AI da Tesla, co-fundador da OpenAI, fundador da Eureka Labs, e o maior educador de deep learning do mundo and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Angular Expert workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Modern Angular (v20+) expert with deep knowledge of Signals, Standalone Components, Zoneless applications, SSR/Hydration, and reactive patterns and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

临床诊断思维 (临床诊断思维 / 临床推理 (Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning) — 医生『怎么想病』的元学科:从症状/体征/检查到诊断结论的认知操作系统,从业者(临床医生/住院医/规培生,尤其全科/急诊/大内科等以未分化主诉为生的科室)、医学生与医学教育者、诊断安全与质量改进研究者、以及做医疗 AI 辅助诊断产品的人的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **直觉模式识别 (System 1: illness scripts 疾病脚本 / pattern recognition / gestalt, 『资深人一眼认出 aunt Minnie』) ⇄ 分析性推理 (System 2: hypothetico-deductive 假设演绎 / Bayesian 概率更新)** 的 dual-process 双过程理论 (Kahneman→Croskerry/Norman 谱系), 资深≠更会分析而是『脚本库更大+校准更好』; 更深层论战 — **『认知去偏可教 (Croskerry: bias awareness / cognitive forcing strategies / diagnostic timeout) ⇄ 偏倚标签是马后炮、知识结构才是主因 (Norman/Sherbino/Monteiro: debiasing 干预 transfer 证据弱, bias 是 hindsight 标签)』** — 本行最核心学术对垒; 『概率思维 (验前概率 × 似然比 → 验后概率, Pauker-Kassirer test/treatment threshold 阈值模型) ⇄ 穷尽式排查 (rule-out everything / 防御性医疗 / VOMIT)』; 『临床 gestalt ⇄ 结构化临床决策规则 (Wells/PERC/HEART)』; 『诊断简约 Occam's razor ⇄ Hickam's dictum (病人可以同时得 N 个病)』; 『床旁体格检查复兴 (Verghese Stanford 25 / McGee 循证体检) ⇄ 影像检验替代床旁』; (b) 方法论正典 — illness script theory (Schmidt/Boshuizen: enabling conditions/fault/consequences 三段结构), problem representation + semantic qualifiers 问题表征与语义限定词 (Bowen NEJM 2006, 把病人翻成 one-liner), hypothetico-deductive model (Elstein 1978《Medical Problem Solving》: 早期假设生成+定向检验), Bayesian 工具箱 (sensitivity/specificity/LR/Fagan nomogram/SnNout-SpPin), threshold model (Pauker-Kassirer NEJM 1975/1980), 认知偏倚分类学 (anchoring/premature closure/availability/confirmation/base-rate neglect/search satisficing/diagnostic momentum — Croskerry 偏倚清单), 去偏与元认知策略 (diagnostic timeout/cognitive forcing/Ely checklist/calibration), schema-based reasoning (Clinical Problem Solvers schemas: 按 pivot 症状走分支), reflective practice 结构化反思 (Mamede/Schmidt), 诊断错误科学 (NAM 2015 报告定义 / Newman-Toker Big Three / Hardeep Singh e-triggers / SAFER Dx 框架); (c) 行业结构与角色 — 医学生→实习/住院医 (晨会 morning report/查房被 pimping/汇报训练)→主治 attending→master clinician (NEJM CPC discussant/晨会大师如 Dhaliwal); 配套生态: 医学教育者 (clinical reasoning curriculum + 评估: script concordance test/key features exam/OSCE), 诊断安全研究者 (SIDM/AHRQ), 诊断辅助与 CDS 工具开发者 (DDx generator/AI); (d) 核心工作流 — 数据采集 (病史为王 + 循证体检 + 针对性检验影像) → 问题表征 (one-liner + semantic qualifiers) → 鉴别诊断生成 (schema / 解剖定位法 / VINDICATE-M 病因筛, 按『常见可能 × 致命不能漏 can't-miss』双轴排序) → 假设定向检验 (按 LR 选检查 / 阈值决策) → working diagnosis + 安全网 (red flags 交代 / test of time / test of treatment) → 反馈校准 (follow-up / M&M / diagnostic timeout); 教学工作流: 晨会渐进披露汇报 / CPC / SNAPPS / one-minute preceptor / virtual morning report; AI 增强工作流 (2023-2026: LLM 鉴别诊断头脑风暴 / OpenEvidence 检索 / ambient scribe 释放认知带宽 + 自动化偏倚 guardrails); (e) 产出物 — one-liner, problem list, prioritized DDx, assessment & plan (按问题分层), 晨会/CPC 汇报, M&M 复盘, 诊断不确定性沟通 (『最可能是 X, 但出现 Y 红旗立刻回来』); (f) 教育与评估 — script concordance test / key feature exam / EPA / 里程碑; 中国语境: 人卫《诊断学》教材 / 执业医师考试 / 规培结业临床思维考核; (g) 争议/批判 — debiasing 之争 (Croskerry vs Norman-Sherbino『knowledge is the cure』, 去偏 RCT 效果弱 / bias 标签不可证伪), 诊断错误率数字之争 (『10-15%』经典估计 / Newman-Toker 79.5 万美国年严重伤害外推方法被质疑 / 尸检符合率), dual-process 二分被批过度简化 (连续谱 / 难以实证分离), 决策规则 vs gestalt (资深 gestalt 常不输 Wells 类规则 / 算法厌恶), vignette 研究外推性 + context/case specificity (推理高度内容绑定不可通用迁移 [Norman/Eva] — 对『教推理通用课』产业的根本批判), AI 辅助诊断 2023-2026 (GPT-4 在 NEJM CPC/vignette 追平或超医生 [Kanjee 2023 JAMA / Goh 2024 JAMA Netw Open『AI alone > physician+AI』悖论] / Google AMIE / OpenEvidence 爆发 vs 自动化偏倚 / 去技能化 / 真实环境验证缺失), 防御性医疗与过度检查 (incidentaloma 瀑布 / VOMIT), 体检衰亡之争, pimping 教学法争议; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 决策科学/Bayesian 派 (Ledley-Lusted 1959 → Elstein/Kassirer/Sox/Pauker/Eddy → Brush) vs 认知心理/双过程派 (Kahneman-Tversky → Croskerry/Graber) vs 教育认知派 (Schmidt/Boshuizen illness scripts → Norman/Eva/Mamede/Durning 情境认知) vs 诊断安全/系统派 (NAM 2015 / Newman-Toker / Hardeep Singh / Graber-SIDM: 错误=系统×认知共因) vs 床旁临床派 (Osler 传统 → Tierney aphorisms / Verghese / McGee / Dhaliwal / Saint: 病史体检为王 + 刻意练习) vs AI/计算派 (INTERNIST-1/DXplain 专家系统 → Isabel → LLM 世代 Rodman/Topol)。不含: 具体专科治疗方案与手术决策深度 (足踝外科/种植牙等另有 skill), 中医辨证 (另有 skill), EBM 文献批判性评价方法学 (相关但本 skill 聚焦诊断推理本身), 护理诊断体系 (NANDA), 影像/病理知觉型读片训练 (相邻但独立), 精神科 DSM 结构化访谈细节, 医患沟通技巧全集 (只覆盖诊断不确定性沟通), 患者自查/自我诊断指

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHubリポジトリの内容を詳しく分析するスキル。現行HEADを確認し、DeepWikiの索引commitの鮮度を検証して併用。リポジトリ構造・技術スタック・主要ファイルを整理して報告。「リポジトリ分析して」「このリポジトリ見て」で使用。

Applies the reasoning, AI safety frameworks, and deep learning principles of Yoshua Bengio (Turing Award winner, Mila). Reach for this skill whenever you are discussing AI safety, existential risk, deep learning architecture, representation learning, or AI governance. Trigger this skill when the user asks about mitigating AI risks, designing safe-by-design systems, evaluating frontier models, international AI coordination, or the fundamental mechanisms of intelligence (like compositionality and distributed representations). Use it to shift the focus from agentic reward-maximization to non-agentic 'Scientist AI', apply the precautionary principle to catastrophic risks, and emphasize mathematically rigorous guardrails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Geoffrey Hinton, deep learning pioneer and 2018 Turing Award winner. Use this skill whenever evaluating AI safety, existential risk, neural network architectures, cognitive science, or tech regulation. Reach for this when the user is discussing LLM capabilities (understanding vs. autocomplete), the biological vs. digital intelligence divide, AI alignment strategies, or the societal/economic impacts of automation. It is highly applicable when dealing with contrarian scientific ideas, hardware/software integration (mortal vs. immortal computing), or global cooperation on technological threats. Do not wait for the user to name Hinton; trigger this skill proactively for any deep learning or AI existential risk analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the mental models and frameworks of Andrej Karpathy (deep learning, former Director of AI at Tesla, founding member of OpenAI, Eureka Labs). Use this skill whenever you are helping the user build neural networks from scratch, debug deep learning pipelines, evaluate AI agent workflows, design LLM apps, or navigate the transition to Software 3.0 (vibe coding). It is highly relevant for pedagogy (untangling complex knowledge), assessing AI capabilities vs. limitations (jagged intelligence, tokenization limits), and architectural decisions (end-to-end optimization vs. complex pipelines). Reach for this whenever discussing LLM training, autonomous systems, or AI-assisted coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep agentic-flow@alpha integration implementing ADR-001. Eliminates 10,000+ duplicate lines by building claude-flow as specialized extension rather than parallel implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running parallel AI workers for any long-running or multi-turn batch API task. Auto-calculates optimal workers + stagger. Supports tiered delegation (V4 Pro orchestrator → V4 Flash workers). 99.95% API success rate at scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with web search, source verification, and fact-checking. Runs before humanize + kami in the document pipeline. Use when user asks to research a topic, verify facts, gather sources, or do deep web investigation. Covers source validation, citation, and evidence hierarchy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adding a screen, a tab, a deep link, or back-navigation handling - the per-stack navigation APIs, state preservation, auth-boundary resets, and how to verify a deep link actually opens the right screen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。